| Literature DB >> 31311923 |
A N Kravchenko1,2,3, A K Guber4,5, B S Razavi6, J Koestel7, M Y Quigley4, G P Robertson4,5,8, Y Kuzyakov9,10,11.
Abstract
Increasing the potential of soil to store carbon (C) is an acknowledged and emphasized strategy for capturing atmospheric CO2. Well-recognized approaches for soil C accretion include reducing soil disturbance, increasing plant biomass inputs, and enhancing plant diversity. Yet experimental evidence often fails to support anticipated C gains, suggesting that our integrated understanding of soil C accretion remains insufficient. Here we use a unique combination of X-ray micro-tomography and micro-scale enzyme mapping to demonstrate for the first time that plant-stimulated soil pore formation appears to be a major, hitherto unrecognized, determinant of whether new C inputs are stored or lost to the atmosphere. Unlike monocultures, diverse plant communities favor the development of 30-150 µm pores. Such pores are the micro-environments associated with higher enzyme activities, and greater abundance of such pores translates into a greater spatial footprint that microorganisms make on the soil and consequently soil C storage capacity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31311923 PMCID: PMC6635512 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11057-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Soil organic C, microbial biomass C, and belowground primary productivity in soil of the studied cropping systems 9 years after their implementation. a Average soil organic C (gray) and microbial biomass C (red) for five studied systems (5–10 cm soil depth). Lower and upper case letters represent statistically significant differences in terms of soil organic C and microbial biomass C, respectively (p < 0.05). Standard errors are equal to 0.1% and 28.5 µg C g−1 for soil organic C and microbial biomass C, respectively. Note that microbial biomass C could not be analyzed in the continuous corn with cover crop system. b Average belowground primary productivity for switchgrass and native succession vegetation systems from 2009 (the year of establishment) till 2013 (0–10 cm soil depth). Error bars represent s.e.m. Years when switchgrass belowground primary productivity exceeded that of native succession vegetation are marked with *p < 0.1 or ***p < 0.01. Source data are provided as a Source Data file
Fig. 2Illustration of the steps involved in pore characterization and in combining 2D zymography and 3D X-ray µCT scanning. a The volume of the soil matrix (pink) within 180 µm distance from ≥30 µm pores (blue) was used as an approximate indicator of the size of the soil matrix that can be potentially affected by C processing taking place within pores. b After µCT scanning (at 30 µm resolution) each soil core was cut into slices, with 2 mm distance between the slices. Each core contained 8–16 slices, and, in most of the cores, zymograms of each enzyme were obtained on two slices per core. c A membrane saturated with an enzyme-specific substrate was placed on the surface of each slice and a zymogram was obtained
Fig. 3Soil pore characteristics of the studied cropping systems 9 years after their implementation. Total porosity (gray bars, left y-axis) and percent of soil matrix located within <180 µm distance from the nearest ≥30 µm pore (red bars, right y-axis). Letters mark significant differences among the systems in terms of percent of soil matrix located within <180 µm distance from the nearest ≥30 µm pore (p < 0.05). Source data are provided as a Source Data file
Fig. 4Standardized enzyme activities in soil micro-sites with prevalence of pores of three size groups (<30 µm, 30–150 µm, and >180 µm). a Enzyme activities from soil slices not subjected to incubations with fresh C inputs. Shown are means across all studied enzymes. Error bars are s.e.m. (based on 139 zymography layers from 13 soil cores). Letters within each cropping system mark statistically significant differences among pore size classes (p < 0.05). b Enzyme activities from slices subjected and not subjected to incubations with fresh nutrient inputs; shown are means across all systems and enzymes. Error bars are s.e.m. (based on 88 and 14 zymography layers without and with new organic inputs, respectively, from 10 soil cores). Letters mark significant differences between enzyme activities in localities with <30 and 30–150 µm pores (p < 0.05). Summary data are provided as a Source Data file
Fig. 5Microbial footprint defines the soil volume available for C protection. Schematic representation of the effect that the abundance of 30–150 µm pores has on the size of the spatial footprint of microorganisms residing in such pores in perennial switchgrass monoculture and biodiverse native vegetation systems