| Literature DB >> 31311632 |
Mitesh Mittal1, Krishnendu Kundu2, Soumendu Chakravarti3, Jajati K Mohapatra4, V K Singh5, B Raja Kumar5, Vikas Thakur5, C P Churamani5, Anil Kumar5.
Abstract
Canine babesiosis is a serious disease among tick-borne haemoprotozoan diseases, globally. The present study was envisaged for carrying out thorough investigation of the disease among working dogs of organised kennels situated in different agro-climatic zones of India as comprehensive understanding of the disease from this country was pertinently lacking. During the study period of three years (2012-2014), 330 dogs suspected for babesiosis were examined for clinicopathology by their physical examination, haematological and biochemical parameters estimation, while the detection of apicomplexan parasites was confirmed by using various diagnostic techniques i.e. by conventional microscopy, by two different Babesia specific 18S rRNA based PCR protocols (conventional/simple PCR and nested PCR assays) followed by sequencing of obtained PCR amplicons for Babsesia spp. identification. Out of 330 clinical cases screened 5.15% (17/330), 9.09% (30/330) and 15.45% (51/330) were found to be positive in microscopic examination, simple- and nested- PCR assay, respectively. Comparative statistical analyses of these diagnostic assay results revealed that significant difference exists among the three diagnostic methodologies and thus it is recommended that the nested PCR technique be relied upon as a screening molecular assay and also for epidemiological studies of the disease in this country. Phylogenetic analysis based on 18S rRNA depicted the monophyletic nature and clonal expansion among all the B. gibsoni, under study. Sequencing results of PCR amplicons revealed that B. gibsoni has predominantly established itself over B. vogeli as former was incriminated in 47 cases while latter was confirmed in only four animals. Based on the clinical severity, these 51 affected animals were classified into three main groups' of 17 animals each viz., apparently healthy-, simple or uncomplicated babesiosis- and atypical or complicated babesiosis- group. Haematological and biochemical profiling of these dogs confirmed the characteristics findings of infection by both the Babesia spp. It was observed that the infection by small form of Babesia (B. gibsoni) is posing a significant therapeutic challenge and chemosterilization by commonly prescribed anti-protozoal drugs was not achieved as clinical relapses were often observed. The clinical signs, sequence based confirmation and severity of the infection suggested that there is a positive selection of B. gibsoni (smaller form) over B. vogeli (larger form) in this country and raises serious concerns as prognosis in former is considered to be poor compared to latter. Thus, these findings have opened new paradigms for planning of pragmatic control strategies against this emerging canine health problem.Entities:
Keywords: Babesia gibsoni; Babesia vogeli; Canine babesiosis; India; Organised kennels; Working dogs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31311632 PMCID: PMC7126866 DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104696
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Vet Med ISSN: 0167-5877 Impact factor: 2.670
Details of the dogs to be positive for canine babesiosis by different diagnostic assays along with their signalment and anamnesis (Conventional/simple PCR refer to 18S rRNA based PCR as per (Oyamada et al., 2005); Nested PCR protocol as per (Hitoshi et al., 2001); yr- Years; mo- months; F-Female dog; F*-Neutered female dog; M- Male dog; Lab-Labrador Retriever; GSD-German Shepherd; CS-Cocker Spaniel; MODS-Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome; DIC-Disseminated Intravascular Coagulopathy; P-Positive; N-Negative).
| S. No | Breed | Age | Sex | Anamnesis | Microscopic | Simple PCR | Nested PCR | Sequence Analysis | Accession Numbers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lab | 9 yr | M | Apparently healthy | N | N | P | |||
| 2 | GSD | 3 yr | F* | Apparently healthy | N | N | P | |||
| 3 | Lab | 4 yr | F* | Apparently healthy | P | |||||
| 4 | GSD | 4 mo | M | Apparently healthy | N | N | P | |||
| 5 | Lab | 4 mo | F* | Apparently healthy | P | |||||
| 6 | GSD | 4 mo | F* | Apparently healthy | N | P | KY563117 | |||
| 7 | Lab | 10 mo | F* | Apparently healthy | N | N | P | |||
| 8 | Lab | 9 yr | M | Apparently healthy | N | P | ||||
| 9 | Lab | 5 yr | M | Apparently healthy | P | KY524482 | ||||
| 10 | Lab | 4 yr | F* | Apparently healthy | N | P | KY524483 | |||
| 11 | Lab | 1yr 9 mo | F* | Apparently healthy | N | N | P | |||
| 12 | GSD | 2 yr | F* | Apparently healthy | N | N | P | |||
| 13 | GSD | 3 yr | F* | Apparently healthy | N | N | P | |||
| 14 | GSD | 8 mo | M | Apparently healthy | N | P | KY563116 | |||
| 15 | GSD | 1 yr | F | Apparently healthy | P | |||||
| 16 | Lab | 4 mo | M | Apparently healthy | N | N | P | KY513707 | ||
| 17 | Lab | 5 mo | F | Apparently healthy | N | N | P | KY513708 | ||
| 1 | GSD | 2 yr | F* | Anaemia | N | N | P | |||
| 2 | Lab | 11 yr | F* | Anaemia | P | |||||
| 3 | GSD | 4 yr | F* | Anaemia | N | P | ||||
| 4 | Lab | 5 yr | F* | Anaemia | P | |||||
| 5 | Lab | 3 yr | F* | Anaemia | N | P | ||||
| 6 | Lab | 7 yr 10 mo | F* | Anaemia | N | N | P | |||
| 7 | Lab | 3 yr | M | Pyrexia | P | KF878946 | ||||
| 8 | Lab | 6 yr | M | Pyrexia | N | P | KF878943 | |||
| 9 | Lab | 3 yr | F* | Pyrexia | N | N | P | |||
| 10 | GSD | 2 yr 5 mo | F* | Pyrexia | P | KY563118 | ||||
| 11 | GSD | 2 yr | M | Pyrexia | N | N | P | |||
| 12 | GSD | 1yr 8 mo | F* | Pyrexia | N | N | P | |||
| 13 | GSD | 2 yr | F* | Pyrexia, Anorexia | P | KP901261 | ||||
| 14 | CS | 5 yr | M | Pyrexia, Anorexia, Vomition | P | KP901263 | ||||
| 15 | Lab | 4 yr 3 mo | M | Pyrexia, Anorexia | N | P | KP901253 | |||
| 16 | GSD | 6 mo | M | Pyrexia, Anorexia | N | N | P | KJ439648 | ||
| 17 | GSD | 6 mo | M | Pyrexia, Anorexia | N | N | P | KJ439649 | ||
| 1 | Lab | 4 yr | M | Epilepsy | P | KP901254 | ||||
| 2 | Lab | 5 yr | M | Epilepsy | N | P | KP901255 | |||
| 3 | Lab | 4 yr 7 mo | F* | Epilepsy | N | N | P | |||
| 4 | Lab | 4 yr | F* | Epilepsy | P | KF878945 | ||||
| 5 | Lab | 3 yr 10 mo | F* | Jaundice | N | N | P | |||
| 6 | Lab | 6 yr 3 mo | F* | Jaundice | P | |||||
| 7 | Lab | 5 yr 6 mo | M | Jaundice | N | N | P | |||
| 8 | GSD | 2 yr 8 mo | M | Renal Failure | N | P | ||||
| 9 | GSD | 6 yr 10 mo | M | Renal Failure | P | KP901262 | ||||
| 10 | GSD | 6 yr 8 mo | F* | Renal Failure | N | N | P | |||
| 11 | Lab | 9 yr | M | Jaundice & Renal Failure | N | N | P | |||
| 12 | Lab | 6 yr 6 mo | F* | Jaundice & Renal Failure | N | P | KP901256 | |||
| 13 | Lab | 6 yr | M | Septic Shock (DIC) and death | P | KY524481 | ||||
| 14 | Lab | 8yr 9 mo | F* | Septic Shock (DIC) and death | P | KP901258 | ||||
| 15 | Lab | 2 yr 10 mo | M | Septic Shock (DIC) and death | N | P | KP901257 | |||
| 16 | Lab | 6 yr 4mo | M | MODS and death | N | P | KP901259 | |||
| 17 | Lab | 5yr 10 mo | F* | MODS and death | P | KP901260 | ||||
Haematological parameters obtained from 51 dogs found positive for canine babesiosis in group wise depiction based on clinical disease diagnosed (Group-1- dogs with subclinical babesiosis; Group-2- dogs with uncomplicated babesiosis or simple babesiosis; Group-3- dogs with complicated babesiosis). Changes in the haematological parameters are indicated as increased, decreased or unchanged (remained within normal/reference range) and the normal/reference range* are as per the values standardised by Central Military Veterinary Laboratory for screening of dog blood samples.
| Haematology parameters | Number of Dogs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increased | Decreased | Unchanged | |||||||||||
| Group-1 | Group-2 | Group-3 | Total | Group-1 | Group-2 | Group-3 | Total | Group-1 | Group-2 | Group-3 | Total | ||
| 1. | Haemoglobin | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 15 | 29 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 20 |
| 2. | Packed Cell Volume | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 15 | 31 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 19 |
| 3. | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (5-25 in mm) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 16 | 32 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 19 |
| 4. | Total Erythrocyte Count | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 15 | 31 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 17 |
| 5. | Total Leucocyte Count | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 30 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 18 |
| 6. | Platelet Count | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 14 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 34 |
| 7. | Differential Leucocyte Count (%) | ||||||||||||
| a. | Neutrophils | 4 | 6 | 7 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 23 |
| b. | Lymphocytes | 2 | 4 | 9 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 8 | 34 |
| c. | Monocytes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 39 |
| d. | Eosinophils | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 36 |
| e. | Basophils | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 | 15 | 47 |
Biochemical parameters obtained from 51 dogs found positive for canine babesiosis with group wise depiction based on clinical disease diagnosed (Group-1- dogs with subclinical babesiosis; Group-2- dogs with uncomplicated babesiosis or simple babesiosis; Group-3- dogs with complicated babesiosis). Changes in the biochemical parameters are indicated as increased, decreased or unchanged (remained within normal/reference range) and the normal/reference range* are as per the values standardised by Central Military Veterinary Laboratory for screening of dog serum samples (A/G Ratio- Albumin/Globulin Ratio; AST- Aspartate amino transferase; ALT- Alanine amino transferase; BUN- blood urea nitrogen).
| Biochemical parameters | Number of Dogs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increased | Decreased | Unchanged | |||||||||||
| Group-1 | Group-2 | Group-3 | Total | Group-1 | Group-2 | Group-3 | Total | Group-1 | Group-2 | Group-3 | Total | ||
| 1. | Total Protein (5.5-7.5 mg%) | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 11 | 10 | 12 | 33 |
| 2. | Albumin (2.6-4.0%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 11 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 6 | 30 |
| 3. | Globulin (2.1-3.7%) | 3 | 11 | 15 | 29 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 20 |
| 4. | A/G Ratio (0.7-1.9) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 15 | 27 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 24 |
| 5. | Total Bilirubin (0.1-0.6 mg%) | 1 | 3 | 9 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 13 | 10 | 8 | 31 |
| 6. | AST (8-48 IU/L) | 3 | 8 | 13 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 9 | 4 | 27 |
| 7. | ALT (8-58 IU/L) | 3 | 7 | 12 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 10 | 5 | 29 |
| 8. | BUN (8.8-26 mg%) | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 15 | 12 | 6 | 33 |
| 9. | Creatinine (0.5-1.6 mg%) | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 16 | 9 | 42 |
Fig. 1Phylogenetic tree based on partial 18S rRNA gene sequence of Babesia isolates by maximum likelihood method. The tree with the highest log likelihood (-9070.8448) is shown. The percentage (only if more than 40%) of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The country of origin, species of Babesia, GenBank accession number and year of isolation are shown for each sequence. Sequences determined in this study are marked with a filled red triangle (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).
Prevalence of B. gibsoni in dogs as observed using three diagnostic assays (microscopic examination of thin blood smears, conventional/simple PCR and nested PCR). Prevalence is placed as percentage in parentheses.
| Sample size (n) = 330 | Microscopy | Conventional/simple PCR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| *nPCR | Positive | Negative | Total | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 16 | 35 | 51 | 30 | 21 | 51 |
| Negative | 1 | 278 | 279 | 0 | 279 | 300 |
| Total | 17 | 313 | 330 | 30 | 300 | 330 |
*n PCR- nested PCR.