Literature DB >> 31311471

We agree with Larkin et al. 2019: restoration is context specific.

Holly P Jones1, Peter C Jones2, Edward B Barbier3, Ryan C Blackburn2, Jose M Rey Benayas4,5, Karen D Holl6, Michelle McCrackin7, Paula Meli4,8, Daniel Montoya9,10, David Moreno Mateos4,11,12.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 31311471      PMCID： PMC6661341          DOI： 10.1098/rspb.2019.1179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN： 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  José M Rey Benayas; Adrian C Newton; Anita Diaz; James M Bullock
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Revisiting the benefits of active approaches for restoring damaged ecosystems. A Comment on Jones HP et al. 2018 Restoration and repair of Earth's damaged ecosystems.

Authors:  Daniel J Larkin; Robert J Buck; John Fieberg; Susan M Galatowitsch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Better restoration policies are needed to conserve mangrove ecosystems.

Authors:  Shing Yip Lee; Stu Hamilton; Edward B Barbier; Jurgenne Primavera; Roy R Lewis
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Anthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt.

Authors:  David Moreno-Mateos; Edward B Barbier; Peter C Jones; Holly P Jones; James Aronson; José A López-López; Michelle L McCrackin; Paula Meli; Daniel Montoya; José M Rey Benayas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Restoration and repair of Earth's damaged ecosystems.

Authors:  Holly P Jones; Peter C Jones; Edward B Barbier; Ryan C Blackburn; Jose M Rey Benayas; Karen D Holl; Michelle McCrackin; Paula Meli; Daniel Montoya; David Moreno Mateos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests.

Authors:  Renato Crouzeilles; Mariana S Ferreira; Robin L Chazdon; David B Lindenmayer; Jerônimo B B Sansevero; Lara Monteiro; Alvaro Iribarrem; Agnieszka E Latawiec; Bernardo B N Strassburg
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 7.  Positive site selection bias in meta-analyses comparing natural regeneration to active forest restoration.

Authors:  J Leighton Reid; Matthew E Fagan; Rakan A Zahawi
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 14.136
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.