| Literature DB >> 31311115 |
Parkpoom Siriarchavatana1, Marlena C Kruger2,3, Matthew R Miller4, Hong Sabrina Tian5, Frances M Wolber6,7.
Abstract
The prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) is rising worldwide, with the most pronounced increase being in the category of metabolic-associated osteoarthritis (MetOA). This is predicted to worsen with the global rise in aging societies and obesity. To address this health burden, research is being conducted to identify foods that can reduce the incidence or severity of MetOA. Oil from the Greenshell mussel (Perna canaliculus) (GSM), a native New Zealand shellfish, has been successfully used to reduce OA symptoms. The current study assessed the effect of including flash-dried powder from whole GSM meat as part of a normal (control) versus high-fat/high-sugar (HFHS) diet for 13 weeks on the development of MetOA in rats. Rats fed a HFHS diet developed metabolic dysregulation and obesity with elevated plasma leptin and HbA1C concentrations. Visible damage to knee joint cartilage was minimal, but plasma levels of C telopeptide of type II collagen (CTX-II), a biomarker of cartilage degradation, were markedly higher in HFHS-fed rats compared to control-fed rats. However, rats fed the HFHS diet containing GSM had significantly reduced serum CTX-II. Inclusion of GSM in rats fed the control diet also lowered CTX-II. These findings suggest that dietary GSM can reduce the incidence or slow the progression of early MetOA.Entities:
Keywords: Greenshell mussel; Perna canaliculus; diet-induced obese rats; metabolic dysregulation; obesity; osteoarthritis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31311115 PMCID: PMC6683089 DOI: 10.3390/nu11071601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Nutritive value of Greenshell mussel (GSM) powder and the composition of fatty acids.
|
| |
| Fat | 8.1 |
| Crude protein | 43 |
| Carbohydrate | 21.9 |
| Moisture | 5.8 |
| Ash | 21.2 |
|
| |
| C14:0 myristic acid | 5.9 |
| C16:0 palmitic acid | 20.3 |
| C17:0 heptadecanoic acid | 1.2 |
| C18:0 stearic acid | 4.9 |
| C18:1n7 vaccenic acid | 3.2 |
| C18:1n9c oleic acid | 2.1 |
| C18:2n6c linoleic acid | 2.1 |
| C18:3n3 α-linolenic acid (ALA) | 1.4 |
| C18:3n4 octadecatrienoic acid | 1.3 |
| C18:4n3 stearidonic acid (SDA) | 2.5 |
| C20:1 gadoleic acid | 2.6 |
| C20:4n6 arachidonic acid (AA) | 1.0 |
| C20:5n3 eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) | 13.5 |
| C22:5n3 docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) | 1.0 |
| C22:6n3 docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) | 10.7 |
| ∑SFA | 34.29 |
| ∑MUFA | 8.23 |
| ∑PUFA | 34.20 |
| ∑n-3 PUFA | 29.4 |
| ∑n-6 PUFA | 3.5 |
∑SFA = sum of saturated fatty acids; ∑MUFA = sum of monounsaturated fatty acids; ∑PUFA = sum of polyunsaturated fatty acids; ∑n-3 PUFA = Omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids; ∑n-6 PUFA = Omega 6 polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Body weight and fat deposition of the rats at the end of the study.
| Weight (g) | ND | ND + GSM | HFHS | HFHS + GSM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW (week 0) | 277.14 ± 8.24 | 280.47 ± 10.48 | 280.78 ± 6.53 | 276.28 ± 9.43 | NS |
| BW (week 13) | 343.00 ± 45.70a | 351.80 ± 51.00a | 400.80 ± 50.43b | 417.2 ± 88.08b | 0.010 |
| % BW gain | 24.05 ± 7.95a | 25.44 ± 8.62a | 42.42 ± 9.56b | 48.22 ± 15.72b | <0.001 |
| %body fat (week 0) | 11.16 ± 3.48 | 11.36 ± 4.62 | 11.24 ± 3.64 | 12.83 ± 4.03 | NS |
| %body fat (week 13) | 21.2 ± 5.43a | 22.88 ± 7.90a | 34.39 ± 4.80b | 36.46 ± 7.52b | <0.001 |
| %body fat gain | 101.13 ± 65.10a | 112.48 ± 60.96a | 232.89 ± 98.82b | 193.91 ± 51.78b | <0.001 |
| Lean mass (week 0) | 237.68 ± 22.77 | 236.28 ± 27.05 | 234.44 ± 20.73 | 227.39 ± 21.92 | NS |
| Lean mass (week 13) | 269.62 ± 32.55 | 275.29 ± 29.86 | 266.68 ± 26.49 | 266.04 ± 29.97 | NS |
| % lean mass gain | 13.34 ± 6.52 | 16.89 ± 8.10 | 13.77 ± 6.30 | 17.01 ± 6.54 | NS |
| Retroperitoneal | 9.05 ± 3.90a | 11.14 ± 5.89a | 19.28 ± 5.01b | 18.81 ± 5.10b | <0.001 |
| Epididymal | 8.80 ± 3.04a | 9.04 ± 3.17a | 15.31 ± 5.25b | 17.90 ± 5.73b | <0.001 |
| Inguinal | 5.23 ± 2.87a | 4.98 ± 4.42a | 7.95 ± 3.95a | 10.71 ± 8.09b | 0.023 |
| Interscapular | 0.83 ± 0.18a | 0.90 ± 0.23a | 0.97 ± 0.19a | 1.10 ± 0.31b | 0.033 |
Data are shown as mean ± SD of n = 11–12 rats per group and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA or by the least significant difference test for multiple comparison tests. Different superscript letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. NS = no significance difference, BW = body weight, ND = normal control diet, HFHS = high-fat high-sugar diet.
Inflammatory and metabolic markers in rat plasma at the end of the study.
| Analysts | ND | ND + GSM | HFHS | HFHS + GSM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-1β (pg/mL) | 23.90 ± 39.34 | 4.93 ± 7.45 | 6.95 ± 15.23 | 13.46 ± 36.93 | NS |
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 21.90 ± 19.23 | 29.40 ± 19.67 | 16.23 ± 22.27 | 19.56 ± 20.27 | NS |
| IL-10 (pg/mL) | 3.36 ± 7.16 | 7.33 ± 13.11 | 14.31 ± 38.74 | 2.39 ± 5.03 | NS |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | 0.16 ± 0.58 | 0.35 ± 0.81 | 1.25 ± 3.30 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | NS |
| HbA1C(ng/mL) | 252.25 ± 50.46a | 227.10 ± 41.59a | 275.44 ± 67.73a | 326.76 ± 120.24b | 0.044 |
| Leptin (ng/mL) | 7.71 ± 5.62a | 8.47 ± 5.52a | 18.26 ± 10.94b | 21.72 ± 14.59b | 0.002 |
| Adiponectin (µg/mL) | 8.17 ± 1.97 | 7.85 ± 2.94 | 7.92 ± 1.94 | 9.51 ± 0.96 | NS |
Rat plasma analytes were measured by ELISA in duplicate wells. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation and were assessed by one-way ANOVA; NS = no significant difference. Least significant difference method was applied for multiple comparison tests. Different superscript letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 1Correlation of plasma leptin with body composition and fat pads was evaluated by the Pearson correlation method. Asterisks indicate a significant difference. “Total fat pads” is the summation of retroperitoneal, epididymal, inguinal, and interscapular fat pad. Scatter plot charts represent the correlation of plasma leptin with each individual parameter.
Figure 2Modulation of cartilage degradation by diet. Plasma samples were assessed in duplicate for C-terminus telopeptide of type II collagen (CTX-II) by competitive ELISA. Data are shown as mean + standard deviation of n = 11–12 rats per group, and the mean values inserted into each bar. * p ≤ 0.05 between the groups within a diet by Student’s t-test.
Figure 3(A): Histopathological assessment of osteoarthritis in right knee joints: Mankin score was used to measure the severity of osteoarthritis at the tibial plateau. Scores for each histological aspect were summed for each individual. Data are shown as mean + standard error of mean of n = 11–12 rats per diet group. No significant difference was detected by analyzing with the Mann–Whitney U test. Knee joint at microscopic levels, 40 and 100× magnification: Articular cartilage of tibia bone (T) from each group, ND (C), ND + GSM (D), HFHS (E), and HFHS + GSM (F). Dark red staining represents cartilaginous layers (CA), which have similarity in color and thickness across all groups. Most of the slices have smooth surface cartilage and seem to be normal articular cartilage. Surface irregularities were found in some tissue samples from HFHS as indicated by black arrowheads (B). SC = subchondral bone, TB = trabecular bone.