| Literature DB >> 31311091 |
Kai-Ruei Yang1, Hui-Chuan Yu2, Chun-Yung Huang1, Jen-Min Kuo1, Cheng Chang2, Chwen-Jen Shieh3, Chia-Hung Kuo4.
Abstract
A new bioprocess to produce resveratrol-enriched rice wine was established and the effects of adding Polygonum cuspidatum root powder to rice wine fermentation were investigated. In this new process, piceid and resveratrol were extracted from P. cuspidatum roots to rice wine and piceid was converted to resveratrol by β-glucosidase during fermentation. After 10 days co-fermentation, rice wine with high levels of resveratrol was obtained, which contained ~14% (v/v) ethanol, 122 mg/L piceid, and 86 mg/L resveratrol. The resveratrol-enriched rice wine had enhanced antioxidant activity with significantly stronger 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity, ferric ion reducing power, and ferrous ion chelating capability. Ultrafiltration (UF) was employed in this study using hollow fibers to clarify the end product, increase shelf life without heat treatment, and maintain the quality of the phenolic compounds. The boiled and UF-treated rice wine were evaluated for ethanol, piceid, resveratrol, clarity, aerobic plate count, total acidity, pH, reducing sugars, and amino acids. The quality of the resveratrol-enriched rice wine was maintained after four weeks storage at normal refrigeration temperatures.Entities:
Keywords: Polygonum cuspidatum; antioxidant activity; clarification; piceid; resveratrol; rice wine; ultrafiltration
Year: 2019 PMID: 31311091 PMCID: PMC6678416 DOI: 10.3390/foods8070258
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Scheme representing transformation of piceid to resveratrol during rice wine fermentation.
Figure 2Effect of P. cuspidatum roots on ethanol yield during rice wine fermentation. Control was performed without the addition of P. cuspidatum.
Figure 3Effect of P. cuspidatum roots on the (a) piceid and (b) resveratrol yields during rice wine fermentation. a,b,c,d When the bars of the same color have significant differences at p-value less than 0.05, homogeneous groups in each variable are identified by the same superscript letter according to the LSD (least significant difference) test.
Figure 4Effect of P. cuspidatum roots on the β-glucosidase activity during rice wine fermentation.
DPPH free radical scavenging activity, ferrous ion chelating activity and reducing power of resveratrol-enriched rice wine. Control was performed without the addition of P. cuspidatum.
| Group | DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity (%) | Reducing Power (Vitamin C Equivalent ppm) | Ferrous-Ion Chelating Activity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 5.12 ± 2.70 c | 6.93 ± 0.20 d | 69.36 ± 0.83 c |
| 1% | 29.70 ± 0.11 b | 107.29 ± 6.43 c | 73.05 ± 1.36 b |
| 3% | 30.42 ± 1.60 b | 189.63 ± 6.94 b | 79.14 ± 0.61 a |
| 5% | 37.18 ± 6.05 a | 293.92 ± 3.47 a | 80.91 ± 1.28 a |
a,b,c,d When there are significant differences at p-value less than 0.05, homogeneous groups in each variable are identified by the same superscript letter according to the LSD test. DPPH: 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl.
Quality characteristics of resveratrol-enriched rice wine treated by boiling and ultrafiltration.
| Item | Boiling | Ultrafiltration | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 KD | 3 KD | ||
| Ethanol (%; | 14.22 ± 0.66 | 14.40 ± 0.24 | 14.50 ± 0.92 |
| Piceid (mg/L) | 120.10 ± 6.07 | 120.67 ± 3.05 | 104.75 ± 2.51 |
| Resveratrol (mg/L) | 82.50 ± 2.52 | 84.93 ± 0.47 | 80.58 ± 0.43 |
| Clarity (%T) | 91.4 ± 0.00 | 99.35 ± 0.05 | 99.60 ± 0.05 |
| Aerobic plate count (CFU/mL) | N.D. 1 | N.D. | N.D. |
| Total acidity (g/L) | 3.83 ± 0.23 | 4.05 ± 0.00 | 4.05 ± 0.00 |
| pH | 3.66 | 3.65 | 3.65 |
| Reducing sugars (mg/mL) | 3.59 ± 0.08 | 4.09 ± 0.19 | 3.55 ± 0.21 |
| Amino acids (mg/mL) | 1.11 ± 0.03 | 1.04 ± 0.00 | 1.05 ± 0.02 |
1 Not detected.
Quality characteristics of resveratrol-enriched rice wine treated by boiling and ultrafiltration process after storage.
| Treat | No. of Weeks | Ethanol (%) | Piceid (mg/L) | Resveratrol (mg/L) | Clarity (%T) | APC | Total Acidity (g/L) | pH | Reducing Sugars (mg/mL) | Amino Acids (mg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boiling | 1 | 14.8 ± 1.9 a | 120.9 ± 0.9 a | 84.1 ± 2.6 a | 89.8 ± 0.1 b | N.D.1 | 3.38 ± 0.2 a | 3.60 | 3.7 ± 0.2 b | 1.55 ± 0.02 d |
| 2 | 14.8 ± 0.5 a | 117.9 ± 8.2 a | 85.8 ± 4.1 a | 91.0 ± 0.0 a | N.D. | 4.05 ± 0.0 a | 3.69 | 4.1 ± 0.1 a | 1.97 ± 0.01 a | |
| 3 | 14.6 ± 0.0 a | 113.2 ± 9.3 a | 79.1 ± 1.3 a | 88.6 ± 0.1 c | N.D. | 4.05 ± 0.0 a | 3.60 | 4.0 ± 0.1 a | 1.75 ± 0.01 b | |
| 4 | 14.2 ± 0.3 a | 113.4 ± 1.0 a | 80.0 ± 2.1 a | 90.0 ± 0.0 b | N.D. | 4.73 ± 0.7 a | 3.60 | 4.0 ± 0.1 ab | 1.67 ± 0.01 c | |
| UF-10K | 1 | 14.1 ± 0.7 a | 120.4 ± 8.0 a | 83.9 ± 0.8 a | 99.3 ± 0.0 a | N.D. | 3.60 ± 0.0 c | 3.60 | 4.3 ± 0.2 a | 1.48 ± 0.02 d |
| 2 | 14.2 ± 0.7 a | 122.8 ± 6.5 a | 85.2 ± 3.7 a | 98.7 ± 0.1 c | N.D. | 4.05 ± 0.0 b | 3.62 | 4.4 ± 0.1 a | 1.95 ± 0.02 a | |
| 3 | 14.6 ± 0.3 a | 120.9 ± 8.2 a | 81.7 ± 2.4 a | 99.0 ± 0.1 b | N.D. | 4.05 ± 0.0 b | 3.61 | 4.4 ± 0.1 a | 1.74 ± 0.02 b | |
| 4 | 14.2 ± 0.9 a | 116.9 ± 2.1 a | 82.6 ± 0.6 a | 98.6 ± 0.0 c | N.D. | 4.95 ± 0.0 a | 3.59 | 4.1 ± 0.2 a | 1.66 ± 0.03 c | |
| UF-3K | 1 | 14.1 ± 2.3 a | 107.9 ± 4.2 a | 80.9 ± 1.1 a | 99.6 ± 0.1 a | N.D. | 3.60 ± 0.0 b | 3.61 | 3.9 ± 0.1 a | 1.47 ± 0.02 d |
| 2 | 14.2 ± 1.6 a | 101.0 ± 5.6 a | 78.0 ± 0.4 a | 98.5 ± 0.1 b | N.D. | 4.05 ± 0.0 a | 3.63 | 4.0 ± 0.1 a | 1.94 ± 0.00 a | |
| 3 | 14.8 ± 1.7 a | 109.8 ± 12 a | 73.9 ± 0.2 a | 98.7 ± 0.1 b | N.D. | 4.05 ± 0.0 a | 3.61 | 4.1 ± 0.1 a | 1.74 ± 0.02 b | |
| 4 | 14.1 ± 0.6 a | 97.2 ± 0.0 a | 75.1 ± 3.4 a | 97.8 ± 0.1 c | N.D. | 4.28 ± 0.2 a | 3.57 | 4.0 ± 0.2 a | 1.62 ± 0.04 c |
1 Not detected. a,b,c,d When the quality characteristics of rice wine with the same treatment have significant differences at p-value less than 0.05, homogeneous groups in each variable are identified by the same superscript letter according to the LSD test. APC: Aerobic plate count.