Literature DB >> 31310931

Determining the endocrine disruption potential of industrial chemicals using an integrative approach: Public databases, in vitro exposure, and modeling receptor interactions.

Olubusayo Alofe1, Edwina Kisanga1, Salmaan H Inayat-Hussain2, Masao Fukumura3, Rolando Garcia-Milian4, Lalith Perera5, Vasilis Vasiliou6, Shannon Whirledge7.   

Abstract

Environmental and occupational exposure to industrial chemicals has been linked to toxic and carcinogenic effects in animal models and human studies. However, current toxicology testing does not thoroughly explore the endocrine disrupting effects of industrial chemicals, which may have low dose effects not predicted when determining the limit of toxicity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the endocrine disrupting potential of a broad range of chemicals used in the petrochemical sector. Therefore, 139 chemicals were classified for reproductive toxicity based on the United Nations Globally Harmonized System for hazard classification. These chemicals were evaluated in PubMed for reported endocrine disrupting activity, and their endocrine disrupting potential was estimated by identifying chemicals with active nuclear receptor endpoints publicly available databases. Evaluation of ToxCast data suggested that these chemicals preferentially alter the activity of the estrogen receptor (ER). Four chemicals were prioritized for in vitro testing using the ER-positive, immortalized human uterine Ishikawa cell line and a range of concentrations below the reported limit of toxicity in humans. We found that 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol (BHT) and diethanolamine (DEA) repressed the basal expression of estrogen-responsive genes PGR, NPPC, and GREB1 in Ishikawa cells, while tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and 2,2'-methyliminodiethanol (MDEA) induced the expression of these genes. Furthermore, low-dose combinations of PCE and MDEA produced additive effects. All four chemicals interfered with estradiol-mediated induction of PGR, NPPC, and GREB1. Molecular docking demonstrated that these chemicals could bind to the ligand binding site of ERα, suggesting the potential for direct stimulatory or inhibitory effects. We found that these chemicals altered rates of proliferation and regulated the expression of cell proliferation associated genes. These findings demonstrate previously unappreciated endocrine disrupting effects and underscore the importance of testing the endocrine disrupting potential of chemicals in the future to better understand their potential to impact public health.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endocrine disrupting chemical (EDC); Environmental chemical; Estrogen receptor; Risk assessment; Uterus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31310931      PMCID: PMC6728168          DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  75 in total

1.  Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial.

Authors:  Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Walter M Cronin; Reena S Cecchini; James N Atkins; Therese B Bevers; Louis Fehrenbacher; Eduardo R Pajon; James L Wade; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; Joan James; Scott M Lippman; Carolyn D Runowicz; Patricia A Ganz; Steven E Reis; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; V Craig Jordan; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals.

Authors:  David J Dix; Keith A Houck; Matthew T Martin; Ann M Richard; R Woodrow Setzer; Robert J Kavlock
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Linking protein kinase C to cell-cycle control.

Authors:  E Livneh; D D Fishman
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1997-08-15

4.  Developmental toxicity of diethanolamine applied cutaneously to CD rats and New Zealand White rabbits.

Authors:  M S Marty; T L Neeper-Bradley; D A Neptun; E W Carney
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Crystallographic comparison of the estrogen and progesterone receptor's ligand binding domains.

Authors:  D M Tanenbaum; Y Wang; S P Williams; P B Sigler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Endocrine-Disrupting Activity of Hydraulic Fracturing Chemicals and Adverse Health Outcomes After Prenatal Exposure in Male Mice.

Authors:  Christopher D Kassotis; Kara C Klemp; Danh C Vu; Chung-Ho Lin; Chun-Xia Meng; Cynthia L Besch-Williford; Lisa Pinatti; R Thomas Zoeller; Erma Z Drobnis; Victoria D Balise; Chiamaka J Isiguzo; Michelle A Williams; Donald E Tillitt; Susan C Nagel
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.736

7.  Toxicity characterization of environmental chemicals by the US National Toxicology Program: an overview.

Authors:  Rajendra S Chhabra; John R Bucher; Mary Wolfe; Christopher Portier
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.840

Review 8.  Systematic review of the association between oil and natural gas extraction processes and human reproduction.

Authors:  Victoria D Balise; Chun-Xia Meng; Jennifer N Cornelius-Green; Christopher D Kassotis; Rana Kennedy; Susan C Nagel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Inhibitory cross-talk between steroid hormone receptors: differential targeting of estrogen receptor in the repression of its transcriptional activity by agonist- and antagonist-occupied progestin receptors.

Authors:  W L Kraus; K E Weis; B S Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Estradiol- and testosterone-induced alterations in phosphatidylcholine and triglyceride synthesis in hepatic endoplasmic reticulum.

Authors:  D L Young
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 5.922

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Updates on molecular and environmental determinants of luteal progesterone production.

Authors:  Natalie A DeWitt; Shannon Whirledge; Amanda N Kallen
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 4.102

2.  Drug use disorder following early life exposure to tetrachloroethylene (PCE)-contaminated drinking water: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ann Aschengrau; Alexandra Grippo; Michael R Winter; Margaret G Shea; Roberta F White; Richard Saitz
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 5.984

3.  The Promises and Challenges of Toxico-Epigenomics: Environmental Chemicals and Their Impacts on the Epigenome.

Authors:  Felicia Fei-Lei Chung; Zdenko Herceg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  Probiotic antigenotoxic activity as a DNA bioprotective tool: a minireview with focus on endocrine disruptors.

Authors:  Natalia Garcia-Gonzalez; Roberta Prete; Monia Perugini; Carmine Merola; Natalia Battista; Aldo Corsetti
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 2.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.