Literature DB >> 31309527

On the Modeling of Patient-Specific Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Fluid-Structure Interaction Approach.

Giulia Luraghi1, Francesco Migliavacca2, Alberto García-González3, Claudio Chiastra2,4, Alexia Rossi5, Davide Cao5, Giulio Stefanini5, Jose Felix Rodriguez Matas2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a minimally invasive treatment for high-risk patients with aortic diseases. Despite its increasing use, many influential factors are still to be understood and require continuous investigation. The best numerical approach capable of reproducing both the valves mechanics and the hemodynamics is the fluid-structure interaction (FSI) modeling. The aim of this work is the development of a patient-specific FSI methodology able to model the implantation phase as well as the valve working conditions during cardiac cycles.
METHODS: The patient-specific domain, which included the aortic root, native valve and calcifications, was reconstructed from CT images, while the CAD model of the device, metallic frame and pericardium, was drawn from literature data. Ventricular and aortic pressure waveforms, derived from the patient's data, were used as boundary conditions. The proposed method was applied to two real clinical cases, which presented different outcomes in terms of paravalvular leakage (PVL), the main complication after TAVR.
RESULTS: The results confirmed the clinical prognosis of mild and moderate PVL with coherent values of regurgitant volume and effective regurgitant orifice area. Moreover, the final release configuration of the device and the velocity field were compared with postoperative CT scans and Doppler traces showing a good qualitative and quantitative matching.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the development of realistic and accurate FSI patient-specific models can be used as a support for clinical decisions before the implantation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve; Finite-element analysis (FE); Fluid–structure interaction simulation (FSI); Patient-specific numerical model; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI); Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31309527     DOI: 10.1007/s13239-019-00427-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol        ISSN: 1869-408X            Impact factor:   2.495


  9 in total

1.  Simulation study of transcatheter heart valve implantation in patients with stenotic bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Salvatore Pasta; Stefano Cannata; Giovanni Gentile; Marzio Di Giuseppe; Federica Cosentino; Francesca Pasta; Valentina Agnese; Diego Bellavia; Giuseppe M Raffa; Michele Pilato; Caterina Gandolfo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis on the Influence of the Aortic Valve Stent Leaflet Structure in Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Xiangkun Liu; Wen Zhang; Ping Ye; Qiyi Luo; Zhaohua Chang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Patient-Specific Immersed Finite Element-Difference Model of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Jordan A Brown; Jae H Lee; Margaret Anne Smith; David R Wells; Aaron Barrett; Charles Puelz; John P Vavalle; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Numerical evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve performance during heart beating and its post-deployment fluid-structure interaction analysis.

Authors:  Ram P Ghosh; Gil Marom; Matteo Bianchi; Karl D'souza; Wojtek Zietak; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-02-24

5.  Paravalvular leak prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expandable prosthesis based on quantitative aortic calcification analysis.

Authors:  Agata Wiktorowicz; Adrian Wit; Krzysztof Piotr Malinowski; Artur Dziewierz; Lukasz Rzeszutko; Dariusz Dudek; Pawel Kleczynski
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-02

6.  Characterization of Turbulent Flow Behind a Transcatheter Aortic Valve in Different Implantation Positions.

Authors:  Leonardo Pietrasanta; Shaokai Zheng; Dario De Marinis; David Hasler; Dominik Obrist
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-13

7.  Improving transcatheter aortic valve interventional predictability via fluid-structure interaction modelling using patient-specific anatomy.

Authors:  Vijay Govindarajan; Arun Kolanjiyil; Nils P Johnson; Hyunggun Kim; Krishnan B Chandran; David D McPherson
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 8.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve disease: does conventional surgery have a future?

Authors:  Breandan B Yeats; Pradeep K Yadav; Lakshmi P Dasi; Vinod H Thourani
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-07

9.  The Comparison of Different Constitutive Laws and Fiber Architectures for the Aortic Valve on Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation.

Authors:  Li Cai; Ruihang Zhang; Yiqiang Li; Guangyu Zhu; Xingshuang Ma; Yongheng Wang; Xiaoyu Luo; Hao Gao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.566

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.