Literature DB >> 31309520

The effect of management models on thromboembolic and bleeding rates in anticoagulated patients: an ecological study.

Alberto Tosetto1, Sophie Testa2, Gualtiero Palareti3, Oriana Paoletti2, Ilaria Nichele4, Francesca Catalano2, Rossella Morandini2, Maria Di Paolo4, Maurizio Tala2, Pilar Esteban2, Francesco Cora'5, Salvatore Mannino6, Anna Maroni7, Maria Sessa8, Giancarlo Castaman9.   

Abstract

The primary study objective is to compare the outcomes of patients taking oral anticoagulant medications in two distinct populations treated according to different management models (comprehensive vs. usual care). (Design: regional prospective cohort study; setting: hospital admission data from two regions). Eligible partecipants were patients taking oral anticoagulant drugs (vitamin K antagonist or direct oral anticoagulants), residents in the Vicenza and Cremona districts from February 1st, 2016 to June 30th, 2017. Patients were identified by accessing the administrative databases of patient drug prescriptions. The primary study outcome was admission to the Emergency Department for stroke, systemic arterial embolism, recurrence of venous thromboembolism or major bleeding. The study evaluated outcomes in 14,226 patients taking oral anticoagulants, of whom 6725 being followed in Cremona with a comprehensive management model. There were 19 and 45 thromboembolic events over 6205 and 6530 patient-years in the Cremona and Vicenza cohort, respectively (IRR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.77). The reduction of events in the Cremona cohort was almost entirely explained by a decrease of events in patients taking VKA (IRR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.78) but not DOACs (IRR 1.08, 95% CI 0.25-5.24). The rate of major bleeding was non-significantly higher in Cremona than in Vicenza (IRI 1.32; 95% CI 0.74-2.40). Across the two cohorts, the risk of bleeding was lower in patients being treated with DOACs rather than warfarin (10/4574 vs. 42/8161 event/person-years, respectively, IRR 0.42 95% CI 0.19-0.86). We conclude that a comprehensive management model providing centralized dose prescription and follow-up may significantly reduce the rate of thromboembolic complications, without substantially increasing the number of bleeding complications. Patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants appear to have a rate of thromboembolic complications comparable to VKA patients under the best management model, with a reduction of major bleeding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Direct oral anticoagulants; Vitamin K antagonists

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31309520     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-019-02148-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  33 in total

1.  On ecological studies: a short communication.

Authors:  John Hart
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Confidence intervals for directly standardized rates: a method based on the gamma distribution.

Authors:  M P Fay; E J Feuer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Effectiveness and safety of novel oral anticoagulants as compared with vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T van der Hulle; J Kooiman; P L den Exter; O M Dekkers; F A Klok; M V Huisman
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  Asynchronous virtual visits for the follow-up of chronic conditions.

Authors:  Ronald F Dixon; Latha Rao
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.536

5.  Benefit of oral anticoagulant over antiplatelet therapy in atrial fibrillation depends on the quality of international normalized ratio control achieved by centers and countries as measured by time in therapeutic range.

Authors:  Stuart J Connolly; Janice Pogue; John Eikelboom; Gregory Flaker; Patrick Commerford; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Jeffrey S Healey; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Daniel M Witt; Robby Nieuwlaat; Nathan P Clark; Jack Ansell; Anne Holbrook; Jane Skov; Nadine Shehab; Juliet Mock; Tarra Myers; Francesco Dentali; Mark A Crowther; Arnav Agarwal; Meha Bhatt; Rasha Khatib; John J Riva; Yuan Zhang; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

Review 7.  Point-of-care testing INR: an overview.

Authors:  Doris Barcellona; Lara Fenu; Francesco Marongiu
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Comparison of an anticoagulation clinic with usual medical care: anticoagulation control, patient outcomes, and health care costs.

Authors:  E Chiquette; M G Amato; H I Bussey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998 Aug 10-24

Review 9.  Efficacy and safety of the novel oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Francesco Dentali; Nicoletta Riva; Mark Crowther; Alexander G G Turpie; Gregory Y H Lip; Walter Ageno
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Dabigatran use in Danish atrial fibrillation patients in 2011: a nationwide study.

Authors:  Rikke Sørensen; Gunnar Gislason; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Jonas Bjerring Olesen; Emil L Fosbøl; Morten W Hvidtfeldt; Deniz Karasoy; Morten Lamberts; Mette Charlot; Lars Køber; Peter Weeke; Gregory Y H Lip; Morten Lock Hansen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.