Literature DB >> 31309296

"All boats will rise": Physicians' perspectives on multidisciplinary lung cancer care in a community-based hospital setting.

Satish K Kedia1, Kenneth D Ward2, Andy C Collins2, Bianca M Jackson3, Fedoria Rugless Stewart3, Nicholas R Faris3, Kristina S Roark3, Raymond U Osarogiagbon3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We explored the perceived strengths, barriers to implementation, and suggestions for sustainable implementation of a multidisciplinary model within a community-based hospital system from the physicians' perspectives.
METHODS: We conducted 9 focus groups with 37 physicians involved in the care of lung cancer patients. Grounded theory methodology guided the identification of recurrent themes that emerged from the qualitative data analysis.
RESULTS: The majority of study participants agreed that the multidisciplinary model could benefit patients by promoting high quality, efficient, and well-coordinated care. Co-location, financial disincentives, and time constraints were identified as major deterrents to full participation in a multidisciplinary clinic. Other perceived challenges were the integration of a multidisciplinary care model into the existing healthcare system, maintenance of referral streams, and designation of the physician primarily responsible for a patient's care. Educating physicians about the availability of a multidisciplinary clinic, establishing efficient processes for initial consultations, implementing technology for virtual participation, and using a nurse navigator with reliable closed-loop communication were suggested to improve the implementation of the multidisciplinary model.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians generally agreed that the multidisciplinary model could improve lung cancer care, but they perceived significant personal, institutional, and system-level barriers that need to be addressed for its successful implementation in a community healthcare setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung cancer; Multidisciplinary model; Physicians’ perspectives; Qualitative methods; Quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31309296     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04950-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  22 in total

1.  Do multidisciplinary integrated care pathways improve interprofessional collaboration?

Authors:  Anita Atwal; Kay Caldwell
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2002-12

2.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  Multidisciplinary cancer management: a systems-based approach to deliver complex care.

Authors:  Joseph O Jacobson
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  "Like heart valve clinic, it probably saves lives, but… Who has time for that?" The challenge of disseminating multidisciplinary cancer care in the United States.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Outcomes of multidisciplinary treatment planning in US cancer care settings.

Authors:  Irene Prabhu Das; Melanie Baker; Cheryl Altice; Kathleen M Castro; Barbara Brandys; Sandra A Mitchell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Multidisciplinary cancer care in a community hospital setting: challenges and rewards.

Authors:  Denis B Hammond
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Patients and carer experiences of care provision after a diagnosis of lung cancer in Scotland.

Authors:  Meinir Krishnasamy; Mary Wells; Erna Wilkie
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  The importance of multidisciplinary team management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P M Ellis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  'One-stop shop': lung cancer patients' and caregivers' perceptions of multidisciplinary care in a community healthcare setting.

Authors:  Satish K Kedia; Kenneth D Ward; Siri A Digney; Bianca M Jackson; April L Nellum; Laura McHugh; Kristina S Roark; Orion T Osborne; Fayre J Crossley; Nicholas Faris; Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

10.  Making the Evidentiary Case for Universal Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncologic Care.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.785

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Implementation of lung cancer multidisciplinary teams: a review of evidence-practice gaps.

Authors:  Nicole M Rankin; Elizabeth A Fradgley; David J Barnes
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08

Review 2.  Quality indicators and excellence requirements for a multidisciplinary lung cancer tumor board by the Spanish Lung Cancer Group.

Authors:  M Guirado; A Sanchez-Hernandez; L Pijuan; C Teixido; A Gómez-Caamaño; Á Cilleruelo-Ramos
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.405

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.