Literature DB >> 31309292

Stamped multilayer graphene laminates for disposable in-field electrodes: application to electrochemical sensing of hydrogen peroxide and glucose.

Loreen R Stromberg1, John A Hondred1, Delaney Sanborn1, Deyny Mendivelso-Perez2, Srikanthan Ramesh3, Iris V Rivero3, Josh Kogot4, Emily Smith2, Carmen Gomes1, Jonathan C Claussen5.   

Abstract

A multi-step approach is described for the fabrication of multi-layer graphene-based electrodes without the need for ink binders or post-print annealing. Graphite and nanoplatelet graphene were chemically exfoliated using a modified Hummers' method and the dried material was thermally expanded. Expanded materials were used in a 3D printed mold and stamp to create laminate electrodes on various substrates. The laminates were examined for potential sensing applications using model systems of peroxide (H2O2) and enzymatic glucose detection. Within the context of these two assay systems, platinum nanoparticle electrodeposition and oxygen plasma treatment were examined as methods for improving sensitivity. Electrodes made from both materials displayed excellent H2O2 sensing capability compared to screen-printed carbon electrodes. Laminates made from expanded graphite and treated with platinum, detected H2O2 at a working potential of 0.3 V (vs. Ag/AgCl [0.1 M KCl]) with a 1.91 μM detection limit and sensitivity of 64 nA·μM-1·cm-2. Electrodes made from platinum treated nanoplatelet graphene had a H2O2 detection limit of 1.98 μM (at 0.3 V), and a sensitivity of 16.5 nA·μM-1·cm-2. Both types of laminate electrodes were also tested as glucose sensors via immobilization of the enzyme glucose oxidase. The expanded nanographene material exhibited a wide analytical range for glucose (3.7 μM to 9.9 mM) and a detection limit of 1.2 μM. The sensing range of laminates made from expanded graphite was slightly reduced (9.8 μM to 9.9 mM) and the detection limit for glucose was higher (18.5 μM). When tested on flexible substrates, the expanded graphite laminates demonstrated excellent adhesion and durability during testing. These properties make the electrodes adaptable to a variety of tests for field-based or wearable sensing applications. Graphical abstract Expanded graphite (eGR) and expanded nanoplatelet graphene (nGN) were chemically exfoliated, thermally expanded, and manually stamped into flexible multi-layer graphene laminate electrodes. Hydrogen peroxide amperometric testing of eGR laminates compared to nGN laminates and a screen printed carbon (SPC) electrode.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biosensing; Flexible electrodes; In-field sensors; Nanomaterials; Nanotechnology; Scalable manufacturing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31309292     DOI: 10.1007/s00604-019-3639-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mikrochim Acta        ISSN: 0026-3672            Impact factor:   5.833


  29 in total

Review 1.  Electrochemical sensors and biosensors.

Authors:  Danielle W Kimmel; Gabriel LeBlanc; Mika E Meschievitz; David E Cliffel
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Electronic confinement and coherence in patterned epitaxial graphene.

Authors:  Claire Berger; Zhimin Song; Xuebin Li; Xiaosong Wu; Nate Brown; Cécile Naud; Didier Mayou; Tianbo Li; Joanna Hass; Alexei N Marchenkov; Edward H Conrad; Phillip N First; Walt A de Heer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Recent developments in the field of screen-printed electrodes and their related applications.

Authors:  O Domínguez Renedo; M A Alonso-Lomillo; M J Arcos Martínez
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 6.057

Review 4.  Electrochemical sensor and biosensor platforms based on advanced nanomaterials for biological and biomedical applications.

Authors:  Govindhan Maduraiveeran; Manickam Sasidharan; Vellaichamy Ganesan
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 10.618

5.  Stainless Steel Electrode for Sensitive Luminol Electrochemiluminescent Detection of H2O2, Glucose, and Glucose Oxidase Activity.

Authors:  Shimeles Addisu Kitte; Wenyue Gao; Yuriy T Zholudov; Liming Qi; Anaclet Nsabimana; Zhongyuan Liu; Guobao Xu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Rapid and Versatile Photonic Annealing of Graphene Inks for Flexible Printed Electronics.

Authors:  Ethan B Secor; Bok Y Ahn; Theodore Z Gao; Jennifer A Lewis; Mark C Hersam
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 7.  Plasma modified surfaces for covalent immobilization of functional biomolecules in the absence of chemical linkers: towards better biosensors and a new generation of medical implants.

Authors:  Marcela M Bilek; David R McKenzie
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2010-02-23

Review 8.  Beyond graphene: Electrochemical sensors and biosensors for biomarkers detection.

Authors:  Paolo Bollella; Giovanni Fusco; Cristina Tortolini; Gabriella Sanzò; Gabriele Favero; Lo Gorton; Riccarda Antiochia
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 10.618

9.  Graphene: status and prospects.

Authors:  A K Geim
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Disposable screen printed electrochemical sensors: tools for environmental monitoring.

Authors:  Akhtar Hayat; Jean Louis Marty
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.576

View more
  6 in total

1.  Phytic acid doped poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) modified with copper nanoparticles for enzymeless amperometric sensing of glucose.

Authors:  Lili Yang; Hao Wang; Haitao Lü; Ni Hui
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.833

2.  Cobalt-copper bimetallic nanostructures prepared by glancing angle deposition for non-enzymatic voltammetric determination of glucose.

Authors:  Masoumeh Pak; Ahmad Moshaii; Hossein Siampour; Sara Abbasian; Maryam Nikkhah
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 3.  Flexible Sensors for Hydrogen Peroxide Detection: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Jacopo E Giaretta; Haowei Duan; Farshad Oveissi; Syamak Farajikhah; Fariba Dehghani; Sina Naficy
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 10.383

4.  Synthesis of porous Co3S4 for enhanced voltammetric nonenzymatic determination of glucose.

Authors:  Ziyin Yang; Xiao Bai; Shuyun Zhu; Chengcheng Qi
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 5.  Printed Electrodes in Microfluidic Arrays for Cancer Biomarker Protein Detection.

Authors:  Lasangi Dhanapala; Colleen E Krause; Abby L Jones; James F Rusling
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-07

Review 6.  Recent trends in the applications of thermally expanded graphite for energy storage and sensors - a review.

Authors:  Preethika Murugan; Ramila D Nagarajan; Brahmari H Shetty; Mani Govindasamy; Ashok K Sundramoorthy
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2021-09-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.