| Literature DB >> 31308711 |
Zahra Mortazavi1, Ahmadreza Bahrmand2, Fatemeh Sakhaee2, Reza Hosseini Doust1, Farzam Vaziri2,3, Seyed Davar Siadat2,3, Abolfazl Fateh2,3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infection is an increasing problem worldwide whose clinical significance is still largely unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of NTM infection from respiratory samples and to determine their clinical significance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 7,825 clinical samples from December 2015 to December 2017. Detection was conducted using phenotypic and genotypic (hsp65 PCR-RFLP, rpoB, and 16S rRNA genes sequencing) methods. All clinical information including symptoms and radiological findings was extracted from patients' records.Entities:
Keywords: Mycobacterium fortuitum; clinical significance; nontuberculous mycobacteria; respiratory samples
Year: 2019 PMID: 31308711 PMCID: PMC6613451 DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S214181
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Drug Resist ISSN: 1178-6973 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Population study flowchart.
Abbreviations: TB, tuberculosis; MTC, Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex; NTM-LD, nontuberculous mycobacteria lung disease; ATS, American Thoracic Society.
Clinical characteristic of patients infected with NTM isolates
| Factors | NTM positive patients (n=53) |
|---|---|
| 52.9±13.8 | |
| Male | 28 (52.8%) |
| Female | 25 (47.2%) |
| Smokers | 16 (30.2%) |
| Non-smokers | 37 (69.8%) |
| Cough | 49 (92.5%) |
| Sputum | 45 (84.9%) |
| Fever | 45 (84.9%) |
| Weight loss | 35 (66.1%) |
| Night perspiration | 32 (60.4%) |
| Gastroesophageal | 26 (49.1%) |
| Dyspnea | 18 (33.9%) |
| Hemoptysis | 12 (22.6%) |
| HIV | 8 (15.1%) |
| Cystic fibrosis | 6 (11.3%) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 5 (9.4%) |
| Sputum | 45 (84.9%) |
| Bronchoalveolar lavage | 8(15.1%) |
| Positive | 12 (22.6%) |
| Negative | 41 (77.4%) |
| Bronchiectasis | 26 (49.1%) |
| Infiltrate | 19 (35.8%) |
| Cavitary | 10 (18.9%) |
| Consolidation | 9 (17.1%) |
| 31 (58.5%) | |
| 12 (22.6%) | |
| 6 (11.3%) | |
| 2 (3.8%) | |
| 2 (3.8%) | |
Abbreviations: NTM, nontuberculous mycobacteria; AFB, acid-fast bacilli.
Patients properties based on NTM isolates
| Factors | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.9±14.2 | 62.5±9.8 | 42.5±11.8 | 46.0±5.7 | 44.0±9.9 | 0.345 | |
| 0.039* | ||||||
| Male | 19 (61.3%) | 2 (16.7%) | 4 (66.7%) | 1 (50.0%) | 2 (100.0%) | |
| Female | 12 (38.7%) | 10 (83.3%) | 2 (33.3%) | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| 0.424 | ||||||
| Smokers | 12 (38.7%) | 2 (16.7%) | 1 (16.7%) | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Non-smokers | 19 (61.3%) | 10 (83.3%) | 5 (83.3%) | 1 (50.0%) | 2 (100.0%) | |
| 0.888 | ||||||
| HIV | 6 (19.4%) | 1 (8.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | |
| Cystic fibrosis | 4 (12.9%) | 1 (8.3%) | 1 (16.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 2 (6.5%) | 2 (16.7%) | 1 (16.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | |
| 0.605 | ||||||
| Sputum | 28 (90.3%) | 10 (83.3%) | 5 (83.3%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | |
| Bronchoalveolar lavage | 3 (9.7%) | 2 (16.7%) | 1 (16.7%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | |
| 0.739 | ||||||
| Positive | 8 (25.8%) | 2 (16.7%) | 1 (16.7%) | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Negative | 23 (74.2%) | 10 (83.3%) | 5 (83.3%) | 1 (50.0%) | 2 (100.0%) | |
| 0.013* | ||||||
| Bronchiectasis | 17 (54.8%) | 5 (41.7%) | 1 (16.7%) | 2 (100.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | |
| Infiltrate | 6 (19.4%) | 9 (75.0%) | 2 (33.3%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | |
| Cavitary | 2 (6.5%) | 1 (8.3%) | 6 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | |
| Consolidation | 3 (9.7%) | 4 (33.3%) | 1 (16.7%) | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Note: *Statistically significant (P< 0.05).
Abbreviations: NTM, nontuberculous mycobacteria; AFB, acid-fast bacilli.
Figure 2Symptoms of patients infected with nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) isolates.
Antimycobacterial susceptibility testing results for clinical isolates of RGM
| Bacteria (no.) and antimicrobial agent | MIC (µg/mL) | No. (%) of isolates | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | 50% | 90% | Susceptible | Intermediate | Resistant | |
| Isoniazid | 2–>256 | >256 | >256 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 31 (100.0%) |
| Rifampicin | 1–>256 | 128 | >256 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 31 (100.0%) |
| Ethambutol | 32–>256 | 256 | >256 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 31 (100.0%) |
| Streptomycin | 8–>256 | 32 | 128 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 31 (100.0%) |
| Amikacin | 0.06–16 | 1 | 8 | 28 (90.3%) | 2 (6.5%) | 1 (3.2%) |
| Ofloxacin | 0.06–32 | 2 | 8 | 15 (48.4%) | 4 (12.9%) | 12 (38.7%) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 0.06–8 | 0.25 | 2 | 15 (48.4%) | 4 (12.9%) | 12 (38.7%) |
| Capreomycin | 0.03–2 | 0.5 | 2 | 14 (45.2%) | 7 (22.6%) | 10 (32.2%) |
| Isoniazid | 16–>256 | >256 | >256 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) |
| Rifampicin | 2–8 | 1 | 8 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) |
| Ethambutol | 128–>256 | >256 | >256 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (100.0%) |
| Streptomycin | 4–64 | 32 | 64 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (100.0%) |
| Amikacin | 0.25–>32 | 16 | 64 | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Ofloxacin | 0.03–8 | 0.5 | 8 | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 0.13–8 | 2 | 4 | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Capreomycin | 0.03–32 | 2 | 16 | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Abbreviations: MIC, minimum inhibitory concentrations; RGM, rapid-growing mycobacteria.
Antimycobacterial susceptibility testing results for clinical isolates of SGM
| Bacteria (no.) and antimicrobial agent | MIC (µg/mL) | No. (%) of isolates | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | 50% | 90% | Susceptible | Intermediate | Resistant | |
| Isoniazid | 16–128 | 32 | 64 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 12 (100.0%) |
| Rifampicin | 0.5–128 | 2 | 8 | 1 (8.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 11(91.7%) |
| Ethambutol | 4–64 | 16 | 64 | 3 (25.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 9 (75.0%) |
| Streptomycin | 2–64 | 16 | 32 | 2 (16.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 10 (83.3%) |
| Amikacin | 0.06–64 | 2 | 16 | 10 (83.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (16.7%) |
| Ofloxacin | 2–64 | 8 | 32 | 1 (16.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 10 (83.3%) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 0.25–64 | 8 | 32 | 3 (25.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 9 (75.0%) |
| Isoniazid | 0.25–16 | 2 | 4 | 6 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Rifampicin | 0.125–16 | 2 | 8 | 6 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Ethambutol | 0.25–64 | 2 | 4 | 5 (83.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (16.7%) |
| Streptomycin | 0.5–32 | 8 | 32 | 4 (66.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (33.3%) |
| Amikacin | 0.125–32 | 2 | 16 | 1 (16.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (83.3%) |
| Ofloxacin | 0.25–4 | 1 | 2 | 2 (33.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (66.7%) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 0.25–16 | 2 | 4 | 2 (33.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (66.7%) |
| Isoniazid | 0.5–>256 | 2 | >256 | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (50.0%) |
| Rifampicin | 0.125–16 | 0.25 | 8 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (100.0%) |
| Ethambutol | 0.5–64 | 1 | 16 | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (50.0%) |
| Streptomycin | 0.25–32 | 1 | 8 | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (50.0%) |
| Amikacin | 0.5–128 | 2 | 32 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (100.0%) |
| Ofloxacin | 1–32 | 2 | 16 | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (50.0%) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 0.125–16 | 0.5 | 8 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (100.0%) |
Abbreviations: MIC, minimum inhibitory concentrations; SGM, slow-growing mycobacteria.