| Literature DB >> 31308414 |
Tengming Shen1, Ernesto Bosque2, Daniel Davis3,2, Jianyi Jiang2, Marvis White4, Kai Zhang3, Hugh Higley3, Marcos Turqueti3, Yibing Huang5, Hanping Miao5, Ulf Trociewitz2, Eric Hellstrom2, Jeffrey Parrell5, Andrew Hunt4, Stephen Gourlay3, Soren Prestemon3, David Larbalestier2.
Abstract
High-temperature superconductors (HTS) could enable high-field magnets stronger than is possible with Nb-Ti and Nb3Sn, but two challenges have so far been the low engineering critical current density JE, especially in high-current cables, and the danger of quenches. Most HTS magnets made so far have been made out of REBCO coated conductor. Here we demonstrate stable, reliable and training-quench-free performance of Bi-2212 racetrack coils wound with a Rutherford cable fabricated from wires made with a new precursor powder. These round multifilamentary wires exhibited a record JE up to 950 A/mm2 at 30 T at 4.2 K. These coils carried up to 8.6 kA while generating 3.5 T at 4.2 K at a JE of 1020 A/mm2. Different from the unpredictable training performance of Nb-Ti and Nb3Sn magnets, these Bi-2212 magnets showed no training quenches and entered the flux flow state in a stable manner before thermal runaway and quench occurred. Also different from Nb-Ti, Nb3Sn, and REBCO magnets for which localized thermal runaways occur at unpredictable locations, the quenches of Bi-2212 magnets consistently occurred in the high field regions over a long conductor length. These characteristics make quench detection simple, enabling safe protection, and suggest a new paradigm of constructing quench-predictable superconducting magnets from Bi-2212.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31308414 PMCID: PMC6629653 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46629-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1JE(B) of an optimally processed sample of the strand used in this study in comparison to that of a Bi-2212 with the previous record performance, the LHC Nb-Ti strand, and the HL-LHC RRP Nb3Sn strand.
Figure 2Coil voltages (RC5) during a linear current ramp (see inset in b) that ended with a quench. (a) Voltage tap map. (b) Coil voltages V13 (whole coil) and V12 and V23 (individual layers).
Figure 3Ramp rate dependence of the quench current Iq of RC5 and RC6 during linear current ramps. Inset shows a 3D display of the contours of the surface magnetic flux density generated by RC6 at 8600 A.
Figure 4Iq of RC6 for consecutive quenches before and after thermal cycling to room temperature and back to 4.2 K.
Figure 5Voltage development of RC5 for staircase ramps of the magnet current that ended with thermal runaway and energy extraction by switching in a dump resistor. The current ramp scheme contains current holding steps during which coil inductive signals die away and noise is much reduced (a). The coil and turn-to-turn voltages are shown in (b and d), respectively. The ramp turn voltage is highlighted in (c). The ramp turn is a 14 cm long section that transitions between the two coil layers in the peak field region. In (d), L1-T1 means the turn #1 of the coil layer #1 (other turns follow the same naming method.) and it is the outermost turn in the low field region. The voltage tap length of turns decreases from 62 cm for L1-T1 and L2-T1 gradually to 52 cm for L1-T6 and L2-T6.
Figure 6The E-I transition of RC5 and RC6 derived from tests with staircase powering schemes for the ramp turns.