Literature DB >> 31308001

Workload impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework for patients with diabetes: an interrupted time series in general practice.

Claire Gilbert1, Victoria Allgar2, Tim Doran3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are substantial concerns about GP workload. The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) has been perceived by both professionals and patients as bureaucratic, but the full impact of the QOF on GP workload is not well known. AIM: To assess the impact of the QOF on GP consultation rates for patients with diabetes mellitus. DESIGN AND
SETTING: This study used interrupted time series of 13 248 745 general practice consultations for 37 065 patients with diabetes mellitus in England.
METHOD: Clinical Practice Research Datalink general practice data were used from 2000/2001 to 2014/2015, with introduction of the QOF (1 April 2004) as the intervention, and mean annual GP consultation rates as the primary outcome.
RESULTS: Mean annual GP clinical consultation rates were 8.10 per patient in 2000/2001, 6.91 in 2004/2005, and 7.09 in 2014/2015. Introduction of the QOF was associated with an annual change in the trend of GP clinical consultation rates of 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.23 to 0.69, P = 0.001) consultations per patient, giving a post-QOF trend increasing by 0.018 consultations per year. Introduction of the QOF was associated with an immediate stepped increase of 'other' out-of-hours and non-clinical encounters, and trend change of 0.57 (95% CI = 0.34 to 0.81, P<0.001) per year, resulting in a post-QOF trend increasing by 0.27 other encounters per year.
CONCLUSION: Introduction of the QOF was associated with a modest increase in clinical GP consultation rates and substantial increase in other encounters for patients with diabetes independent of changes in diabetes prevalence. National prevalence of diabetes increased by 90.7% from 2004/2005 to 2014/2015, which, combined with this study's findings, means GPs would have provided nearly double the number of consultations for patients with diabetes over this timescale. © British Journal of General Practice 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diabetes mellitus; incentives; primary care; workload

Year:  2019        PMID: 31308001      PMCID: PMC6650130          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X704645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  2 in total

1.  GP's perspectives on laboratory test use for monitoring long-term conditions: an audit of current testing practice.

Authors:  Martha M C Elwenspoek; Ed Mann; Katharine Alsop; Hannah Clark; Rita Patel; Jessica C Watson; Penny Whiting
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 2.497

2.  Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of electronic clinical decision support systems: a qualitative interview study with UK general practitioners.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ford; Natalie Edelman; Laura Somers; Duncan Shrewsbury; Marcela Lopez Levy; Harm van Marwijk; Vasa Curcin; Talya Porat
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.796

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.