Literature DB >> 31307919

Progression of two Progressive Supranuclear Palsy phenotypes with comparable initial disability.

Ali Shoeibi1, Irene Litvan2, Eduardo Tolosa3, Teodoro Del Ser4, Euyhyun Lee5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To avoid bias and optimize statistical power of disease-modifying therapeutic trials, it is critical to include homogeneous populations with similar rate of progression over time. Patients with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)-Parkinsonism phenotype have overall slower disease progression than those with PSP-Richardson syndrome phenotype. However, it is unclear if the progression rate of PSP-Parkinsonism is the same when the PSP-Parkinsonism converts to PSP Richardson syndrome. We aimed to determine and compare disease progression rate of patients with the two most common PSP phenotypes: PSP-Parkinsonism and PSP Richardson syndrome, participating in the TAUROS trial.
METHODS: 138 patients, 56 with PSP-Parkinsonism and 82 with PSP-Richardson syndrome, with similar clinical severity at baseline, were followed up to 60 weeks. PSP-Parkinsonism allocation was based on experts' judgement and PSP-Richardson on probable NINDS-PSP criteria. Global disease progression was measured by the PSP Rating Scale as primary outcome measure and several secondary outcome measures.
RESULTS: PSP-Richardson syndrome patients had significantly faster progression based on the primary and three secondary outcome measures: the Dementia Rating Scale-2, Frontal Assessment Battery, and lexical fluency scale. Analyses including only patients with a baseline symptom duration under five years showed similar results. PSP phenotype was the strongest predictor for disease progression.
CONCLUSION: This research showed that even when disease severity and clinical features at baseline are similar, patients with PSP- Richardson syndrome progressed significantly faster than those with PSP-Parkinsonism. Therefore, unless stratified by phenotype, future therapeutic clinical trials should not lump PSP patients with these phenotypes as a single disorder even if they have similar disease severity at screening.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Progression; Progressive supranuclear palsy; Progressive supranuclear palsy-Parkinsonism; Progressive supranuclear palsy-Richardson syndrome

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31307919     DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord        ISSN: 1353-8020            Impact factor:   4.891


  6 in total

Review 1.  "Parkinson's disease" on the way to progressive supranuclear palsy: a review on PSP-parkinsonism.

Authors:  Ján Necpál; Miroslav Borsek; Bibiána Jeleňová
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Are the International Parkinson disease and Movement Disorder Society progressive supranuclear palsy (IPMDS-PSP) diagnostic criteria accurate enough to differentiate common PSP phenotypes?

Authors:  Ali Shoeibi; Irene Litvan; Jorge L Juncos; Yvette Bordelon; David Riley; David Standaert; Stephen G Reich; David Shprecher; Deborah Hall; Connie Marras; Benzi Kluger; Nahid Olfati; Joseph Jankovic
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 4.891

3.  Association of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Quality of Life Scale.

Authors:  Alexander Pantelyat; Lenora Higginbotham; Liana Rosenthal; Diane Lanham; Vanessa Nesspor; Mina AlSalihi; Jee Bang; Jiangxia Wang; Marilyn Albert
Journal:  Neurodegener Dis       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.977

4.  Distribution patterns of tau pathology in progressive supranuclear palsy.

Authors:  Gabor G Kovacs; Milica Jecmenica Lukic; David J Irwin; Thomas Arzberger; Gesine Respondek; Edward B Lee; David Coughlin; Armin Giese; Murray Grossman; Carolin Kurz; Corey T McMillan; Ellen Gelpi; Yaroslau Compta; John C van Swieten; Laura Donker Laat; Claire Troakes; Safa Al-Sarraj; John L Robinson; Sigrun Roeber; Sharon X Xie; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski; Günter U Höglinger
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 17.088

5.  Relevance of Subtype Classification of PSP.

Authors:  Koustav Chatterjee; Supriyo Choudhury; Hrishikesh Kumar
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 1.383

Review 6.  Clinical Spectrum of Tauopathies.

Authors:  Nahid Olfati; Ali Shoeibi; Irene Litvan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.086

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.