Yu-Ting Lin1, Yu-Fu Shen2, Pein-Chi Wei3, Kuang-Wei Hsu4. 1. Attending Doctor, Department of Prosthodontics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, Republic of China. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, Republic of China. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan Branch, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, Republic of China. 4. Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, Republic of China. Electronic address: kwhsu3876@gmail.com.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Information about the long-term evaluation of 2-piece zirconia abutments (TPZAs) with bonded titanium inserts for implant-supported restorations is sparse. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of TPZAs with bonded titanium inserts for implant-supported restorations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated the records of patients who received implant restorations supported by TPZAs with bonded titanium inserts. The patients were recalled between January 2017 and December 2017 so that the restorations could be examined clinically and radiographically for technical and biological complications. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients with 30 restorations and 42 zirconia abutments (ZAs) were included in the study. The patient records revealed that all implants remained integrated. However, 5 restorations supported by seven ZAs in 4 patients had to be refabricated because of abutment failure before the recall. Six of the failed abutments were in the molar area, with a combination of zirconia and titanium as the connection platform. Additional complications included screw loosening (1 patient), ceramic chipping (1 patient), and peri-implantitis (1 patient). The mean observation period was 6.6 ±1.5 years (range: 3.6 to 9.2 years). CONCLUSIONS: After a mean observation period of 6 years after insertion, TPZAs with bonded titanium inserts appear to be a suitable treatment option in the anterior and premolar regions. However, in the molar area, the use of the same type of ZA without a complete metal-to-metal connection platform to support the restoration led to a high incidence of fracture.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Information about the long-term evaluation of 2-piece zirconia abutments (TPZAs) with bonded titanium inserts for implant-supported restorations is sparse. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of TPZAs with bonded titanium inserts for implant-supported restorations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated the records of patients who received implant restorations supported by TPZAs with bonded titanium inserts. The patients were recalled between January 2017 and December 2017 so that the restorations could be examined clinically and radiographically for technical and biological complications. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients with 30 restorations and 42 zirconia abutments (ZAs) were included in the study. The patient records revealed that all implants remained integrated. However, 5 restorations supported by seven ZAs in 4 patients had to be refabricated because of abutment failure before the recall. Six of the failed abutments were in the molar area, with a combination of zirconia and titanium as the connection platform. Additional complications included screw loosening (1 patient), ceramic chipping (1 patient), and peri-implantitis (1 patient). The mean observation period was 6.6 ±1.5 years (range: 3.6 to 9.2 years). CONCLUSIONS: After a mean observation period of 6 years after insertion, TPZAs with bonded titanium inserts appear to be a suitable treatment option in the anterior and premolar regions. However, in the molar area, the use of the same type of ZA without a complete metal-to-metal connection platform to support the restoration led to a high incidence of fracture.