Ming He1, Zhenyu Liu2, Yusong Lin3, Jianzhong Wan3, Juan Li1, Kai Xu1, Yun Wang1, Zhengyu Jin1, Jie Tian4, Huadan Xue5. 1. From the Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Beijing, China. 2. From CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing and China and University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100080, China. 3. From the Software Technology School of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. 4. From CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing and China and University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100080, China; Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China; Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710126, China. Electronic address: jie.tian@ia.ac.cn. 5. From the Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Beijing, China. Electronic address: bjdanna95@hotmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop and validate an effective model to differentiate NF-pNET from PDAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2014 and December 2017, 147 patients (80 patients with PDAC and 67 patients with atypical NF-pNET) with pathology results and enhanced CT were consecutively enrolled and chronologically divided into primary and validation cohorts. Three models were built to differentiate atypical NF-pNET from PDAC, including a model based on radiomic signature alone, one based on clinicoradiological features alone and one that integrated the two. The diagnostic performance of the three models was estimated and compared with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the validation cohort. A nomogram was used to represent the model with the best performance, and the associated calibration was also assessed. RESULTS: In the validation cohort, the AUC for differential diagnosis was 0.884 with the integrated model, which was significantly improved over that of the model based on clinicoradiological features (AUC = 0.775, p value = 0.004) and was comparable to that of the model based on the radiomic signature (AUC = 0.873, p value = 0.512). The nomogram representing the integrated model achieved good discrimination performances in both the primary and validation cohorts, with C-indices of 0.960 and 0.884, respectively. CONCLUSION: The integrated model outperformed the model based on clinicoradiological features alone and was comparable to the model based on the radiomic signature alone with respect to the differential diagnosis of atypical NF-pNET and PDAC. The nomogram achieved an optimal preoperative, noninvasive differential diagnosis between atypical pNET and PDAC, which can better inform therapeutic choice in clinical practice.
PURPOSE: To develop and validate an effective model to differentiate NF-pNET from PDAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2014 and December 2017, 147 patients (80 patients with PDAC and 67 patients with atypical NF-pNET) with pathology results and enhanced CT were consecutively enrolled and chronologically divided into primary and validation cohorts. Three models were built to differentiate atypical NF-pNET from PDAC, including a model based on radiomic signature alone, one based on clinicoradiological features alone and one that integrated the two. The diagnostic performance of the three models was estimated and compared with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the validation cohort. A nomogram was used to represent the model with the best performance, and the associated calibration was also assessed. RESULTS: In the validation cohort, the AUC for differential diagnosis was 0.884 with the integrated model, which was significantly improved over that of the model based on clinicoradiological features (AUC = 0.775, p value = 0.004) and was comparable to that of the model based on the radiomic signature (AUC = 0.873, p value = 0.512). The nomogram representing the integrated model achieved good discrimination performances in both the primary and validation cohorts, with C-indices of 0.960 and 0.884, respectively. CONCLUSION: The integrated model outperformed the model based on clinicoradiological features alone and was comparable to the model based on the radiomic signature alone with respect to the differential diagnosis of atypical NF-pNET and PDAC. The nomogram achieved an optimal preoperative, noninvasive differential diagnosis between atypical pNET and PDAC, which can better inform therapeutic choice in clinical practice.
Authors: Femke C R Staal; Else A Aalbersberg; Daphne van der Velden; Erica A Wilthagen; Margot E T Tesselaar; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Monique Maas Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2022-07-26 Impact factor: 7.034
Authors: Jiake Xu; Jie Yang; Ye Feng; Jie Zhang; Yuqiao Zhang; Sha Chang; Jingqiang Jin; Xia Du Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-05-19 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Calogero Casà; Antonio Piras; Andrea D'Aviero; Francesco Preziosi; Silvia Mariani; Davide Cusumano; Angela Romano; Ivo Boskoski; Jacopo Lenkowicz; Nicola Dinapoli; Francesco Cellini; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Vincenzo Valentini; Gian Carlo Mattiucci; Luca Boldrini Journal: Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2022-03-16