Julie Hanson1, Patrea Andersen2, Peter K Dunn3. 1. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia. Electronic address: jhanson@usc.edu.au. 2. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia. Electronic address: panders1@usc.edu.au. 3. School Health and Sports Science, ML 40, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore DC 4558, Australia. Electronic address: pdunn2@usc.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Historically nursing and midwifery students have reported difficulty understanding the concept-based science underpinning the interactions between drugs and their targets. This knowledge is crucial for the administration and monitoring of the therapeutic and adverse effects of medications. Immersive three-dimensional technology is reported to enhance understanding of complex scientific concepts but the physical effects of motion sickness may limit its use. OBJECTIVES: This project compared the effectiveness of three-dimensional immersive visualisation technology with two-dimensional visualisation technology as a teaching method to improve student understanding of a pharmacological concept, and to assess levels of student discomfort and satisfaction associated with the experience. DESIGN: Traditional lecture content and presentation about drug-receptor binding was followed by exposure to either a two- or three-dimensional artifact visualising β-adrenoceptor binding. Two student groups were compared by type of exposure: Group 1 watched the artifact via a three-dimensional immersive facility and Group 2 on a wide, two-dimensional screen. SETTINGS: School of Nursing and Midwifery in a regional university in Southeast Queensland, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and two second year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students. METHODS: The study used mixed methods methodology. Pre- and post- testing of student knowledge was collected using five multiple-choice questions. A post-intervention survey elicited students' self-assessed perceptions of discomfort and satisfaction with the learning experience. RESULTS: The three-dimensional immersive learning experience was comparable to the two-dimensional experience in terms of satisfaction and comfort but resulted in statistically significant improvements in post-test scores. CONCLUSIONS: The three-dimensional experience improved understanding when compared to two-dimensional viewing, satisfied students leaning needs, and caused minimal discomfort. The results are encouraging in terms of using three-dimensional technology to enhance student knowledge of pharmacological concepts necessary for competency in medication management.
BACKGROUND: Historically nursing and midwifery students have reported difficulty understanding the concept-based science underpinning the interactions between drugs and their targets. This knowledge is crucial for the administration and monitoring of the therapeutic and adverse effects of medications. Immersive three-dimensional technology is reported to enhance understanding of complex scientific concepts but the physical effects of motion sickness may limit its use. OBJECTIVES: This project compared the effectiveness of three-dimensional immersive visualisation technology with two-dimensional visualisation technology as a teaching method to improve student understanding of a pharmacological concept, and to assess levels of student discomfort and satisfaction associated with the experience. DESIGN: Traditional lecture content and presentation about drug-receptor binding was followed by exposure to either a two- or three-dimensional artifact visualising β-adrenoceptor binding. Two student groups were compared by type of exposure: Group 1 watched the artifact via a three-dimensional immersive facility and Group 2 on a wide, two-dimensional screen. SETTINGS: School of Nursing and Midwifery in a regional university in Southeast Queensland, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and two second year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students. METHODS: The study used mixed methods methodology. Pre- and post- testing of student knowledge was collected using five multiple-choice questions. A post-intervention survey elicited students' self-assessed perceptions of discomfort and satisfaction with the learning experience. RESULTS: The three-dimensional immersive learning experience was comparable to the two-dimensional experience in terms of satisfaction and comfort but resulted in statistically significant improvements in post-test scores. CONCLUSIONS: The three-dimensional experience improved understanding when compared to two-dimensional viewing, satisfied students leaning needs, and caused minimal discomfort. The results are encouraging in terms of using three-dimensional technology to enhance student knowledge of pharmacological concepts necessary for competency in medication management.
Authors: Robin Colin Alexander Barrett; Rollin Poe; Justin William O'Camb; Cal Woodruff; Scott Marcus Harrison; Katerina Dolguikh; Christine Chuong; Amanda Dawn Klassen; Ruilin Zhang; Rohan Ben Joseph; Mark Randall Blair Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-10-06 Impact factor: 3.752