Literature DB >> 31305530

NMR-Based Activity Assays for Determining Compound Inhibition, IC50 Values, Artifactual Activity, and Whole-Cell Activity of Nucleoside Ribohydrolases.

Brian J Stockman1, Abinash Kaur2, Julia K Persaud2, Maham Mahmood2, Samantha F Thuilot2, Melissa B Emilcar2, Madison Canestrari2, Juliana A Gonzalez2, Shannon Auletta2, Vital Sapojnikov2, Wagma Caravan3, Samantha N Muellers4.   

Abstract

NMR spectroscopy is often used for the identification and characterization of enzyme inhibitors in drug discovery, particularly in the context of fragment screening. NMR-based activity assays are ideally suited to work at the higher concentrations of test compounds required to detect these weaker inhibitors. The dynamic range and chemical shift dispersion in an NMR experiment can easily resolve resonances from substrate, product, and test compounds. This contrasts with spectrophotometric assays, in which read-out interference problems often arise from compounds with overlapping UV-vis absorption profiles. In addition, since they lack reporter enzymes, the single-enzyme NMR assays are not prone to coupled-assay false positives. This attribute makes them useful as orthogonal assays, complementing traditional high throughput screening assays and benchtop triage assays. Detailed protocols are provided for initial compound assays at 500 μM and 250 μM, dose-response assays for determining IC50 values, detergent counter screen assays, jump-dilution counter screen assays, and assays in E. coli whole cells. The methods are demonstrated using two nucleoside ribohydrolase enzymes. The use of 1H NMR is shown for the purine-specific enzyme, while 19F NMR is shown for the pyrimidine-specific enzyme. The protocols are generally applicable to any enzyme where substrate and product resonances can be observed and distinguished by NMR spectroscopy. To be the most useful in the context of drug discovery, the final concentration of substrate should be no more than 2-3x its Km value. The choice of NMR experiment depends on the enzyme reaction and substrates available as well as available NMR instrumentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31305530      PMCID: PMC7061360          DOI: 10.3791/59928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  17 in total

1.  A general NMR method for rapid, efficient, and reliable biochemical screening.

Authors:  Claudio Dalvit; Elena Ardini; Maria Flocco; Gian Paolo Fogliatto; Nicola Mongelli; Marina Veronesi
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 2.  Quantitative NMR spectroscopy in pharmaceutical applications.

Authors:  Ulrike Holzgrabe
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 9.795

3.  Adenosine/guanosine preferring nucleoside ribohydrolase is a distinct, druggable antitrichomonal target.

Authors:  Sierra Beck; Samantha N Muellers; Annie Laurie Benzie; David W Parkin; Brian J Stockman
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Identification of proton-pump inhibitor drugs that inhibit Trichomonas vaginalis uridine nucleoside ribohydrolase.

Authors:  Tara A Shea; Paola J Burburan; Vivian N Matubia; Sandy S Ramcharan; Irving Rosario; David W Parkin; Brian J Stockman
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Impact of enzyme concentration and residence time on apparent activity recovery in jump dilution analysis.

Authors:  Robert A Copeland; Aravind Basavapathruni; Mikel Moyer; Margaret Porter Scott
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  Ligand-Efficient Inhibitors of Trichomonas vaginalis Adenosine/Guanosine Preferring Nucleoside Ribohydrolase.

Authors:  Samantha N Muellers; Juliana A Gonzalez; Abinash Kaur; Vital Sapojnikov; Annie Laurie Benzie; Dean G Brown; David W Parkin; Brian J Stockman
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.084

7.  2-Fluoro-ATP as a versatile tool for 19F NMR-based activity screening.

Authors:  Brian J Stockman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Identification of allosteric PIF-pocket ligands for PDK1 using NMR-based fragment screening and 1H-15N TROSY experiments.

Authors:  Brian J Stockman; Michael Kothe; Darcy Kohls; Laura Weibley; Brendan J Connolly; Alissa L Sheils; Qing Cao; Alan C Cheng; Lily Yang; Ajith V Kamath; Yuan-Hua Ding; Maura E Charlton
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.817

9.  Development of fragment-based n-FABS NMR screening applied to the membrane enzyme FAAH.

Authors:  Chiara Lambruschini; Marina Veronesi; Elisa Romeo; Gianpiero Garau; Tiziano Bandiera; Daniele Piomelli; Rita Scarpelli; Claudio Dalvit
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.164

10.  The Ecstasy and Agony of Assay Interference Compounds.

Authors:  Courtney Aldrich; Carolyn Bertozzi; Gunda I Georg; Laura Kiessling; Craig Lindsley; Dennis Liotta; Kenneth M Merz; Alanna Schepartz; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 14.553

View more
  1 in total

1.  Discovery of Ligand-Efficient Scaffolds for the Design of Novel Trichomonas vaginalis Uridine Nucleoside Ribohydrolase Inhibitors Using Fragment Screening.

Authors:  Shannon Auletta; Wagma Caravan; Julia K Persaud; Samantha F Thuilot; Dean G Brown; David W Parkin; Brian J Stockman
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2019-09-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.