RATIONALE: Fenestration of the basilar artery is most common in the proximal portion near the vertebrobasilar artery junction. Conversely, fenestration of the middle and distal portions of the basilar artery is not common, and fenestration of the basilar artery with an aneurysm is even less common. PATIENT CONCERNS: This study reports the case of a 37-year-old woman with basilar artery fenestration malformation and an aneurysm at the mid-distal junction; her symptoms included sudden headaches with nausea and vomiting. DIAGNOSES: Head digital subtraction angiography showed fenestration at the junction of the middle and upper portions of the basilar artery associated with an aneurysm, and spontaneous pseudoaneurysm formation could not be excluded. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent stent-assisted fenestration and channel occlusion. OUTCOMES: Five months later, no abnormalities were found by head magnetic resonance imaging. The stents were well positioned, and no occluded branches or aneurysms were present. LESSONS: For mid-distal basilar artery fenestration malformation with an aneurysm, occlusion of the lesion channel is relatively safe when there are no perforating vessels in the fenestration channel and the lesion channel is a nondominant channel. Overall, more attention should be paid to the possibility of pseudoaneurysm formation in the diagnosis and treatment of this type of aneurysm.
RATIONALE: Fenestration of the basilar artery is most common in the proximal portion near the vertebrobasilar artery junction. Conversely, fenestration of the middle and distal portions of the basilar artery is not common, and fenestration of the basilar artery with an aneurysm is even less common. PATIENT CONCERNS: This study reports the case of a 37-year-old woman with basilar artery fenestration malformation and an aneurysm at the mid-distal junction; her symptoms included sudden headaches with nausea and vomiting. DIAGNOSES: Head digital subtraction angiography showed fenestration at the junction of the middle and upper portions of the basilar artery associated with an aneurysm, and spontaneous pseudoaneurysm formation could not be excluded. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent stent-assisted fenestration and channel occlusion. OUTCOMES: Five months later, no abnormalities were found by head magnetic resonance imaging. The stents were well positioned, and no occluded branches or aneurysms were present. LESSONS: For mid-distal basilar artery fenestration malformation with an aneurysm, occlusion of the lesion channel is relatively safe when there are no perforating vessels in the fenestration channel and the lesion channel is a nondominant channel. Overall, more attention should be paid to the possibility of pseudoaneurysm formation in the diagnosis and treatment of this type of aneurysm.
Fenestration is a common variation of intracranial arteries. The fenestration pathway begins with a common origin and splits into 2 endothelial cell-lined ducts that then reconnect distally.[ Basilar artery fenestration is the 2nd most common intracranial artery fenestration after anterior communicating fenestration.[ Fenestration deformity of the basilar artery is most common near the vertebrobasilar artery junction. In contrast, fenestration deformity of the middle and distal basilar arteries is not common, and fenestration deformity with an aneurysm is even less common.[ This study reports the case of a patient with basilar artery fenestration deformity and an aneurysm at the mid-distal junction. While pseudoaneurysm formation could not be excluded,[ it is very rare in the clinic. Currently, little is known about this condition, and relatively few data based on experience with interventional therapies are available. In this case report, we describe our experience regarding the diagnosis and treatment of this condition with a review of the relevant literature.
Case report
The patient, a 37-year-old woman, was admitted to our hospital on July 7, 2018, after 5 days of sudden headaches with nausea and vomiting. On July 3, 2018, with no obvious cause for symptoms, her family sent her to the local hospital for treatment. On July 3, 2018, head computed tomography (CT) showed subarachnoid hemorrhage (Fig. 1). On July 4, 2018, CT angiography revealed no obvious abnormalities. After she underwent conservative treatment at a local hospital for 5 days, she achieved relief from the headaches. To obtain a diagnosis and further treatment, she visited our hospital. Physical examination revealed a positive meningeal irritation sign and a positive Kernig sign, and the 2 transverse fingers displayed positive cervical rigidity; no other obvious abnormalities were found. There was no history of hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, or other conditions. She denied a history of trauma or surgery. Head digital subtraction angiography (DSA) performed at our hospital on July 8, 2018, showed fenestration at the junction of the middle and upper portions of the basilar artery with an aneurysm; spontaneous pseudoaneurysms could not be excluded, the bilateral posterior communication was obviously open, and the posterior cerebral artery was well developed (Fig. 2A, B).
Figure 1
Head computed tomography indicated subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Figure 2
(A and B) Fenestration deformity of the basilar artery trunk with an aneurysm.
Head computed tomography indicated subarachnoid hemorrhage.(A and B) Fenestration deformity of the basilar artery trunk with an aneurysm.
Interventional therapy
The patient underwent stent-assisted fenestration and channel occlusion under general anesthesia. An Enterprise stent 4.5 × 22 mm in size was placed in the normal fenestration malformation channel with the 2 ends of the stent completely covering the openings of the lesion channel. Target 360 NANO (1.5 mm × 3 cm) and helical (1.5 mm × 2 cm, 1 mm × 2 cm) spring coils were placed to fill in the fenestration malformation channel. Intraoperative routine heparin saline irrigation and continuous anticoagulation therapy were performed. After stent placement, tirofiban was administered intravenously at 10 mL/kg/h to prevent angiogenesis in the stents. Following the procedure, the stents were found to be well positioned, with no lesion channel or aneurysm visible (Fig. 3A, B). After embolization, the patient was lucid and exhibited good limb movement. At 24 hours after the operation, the oral administration of 100 mg of aspirin and 75 mg of Plavix once per day was prescribed to continue the anticoagulation treatment and prevent thrombosis in the stents. Five months later, no abnormalities were found by head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The stents were well positioned, and no occluded branches or aneurysms were present (Fig. 4A, B).
Figure 3
(A) Stent-assisted lesion channel occlusion and (B) pattern diagram. BA = basilar artery, L-PCA = left posterior cerebral artery, L-VA = left vertebral artery, R-PCA = right posterior cerebral artery, R-VA = right vertebral artery.
Figure 4
(A and B) Angiography showed that the stent was well positioned and there were no occluded branches or aneurysms.
(A) Stent-assisted lesion channel occlusion and (B) pattern diagram. BA = basilar artery, L-PCA = left posterior cerebral artery, L-VA = left vertebral artery, R-PCA = right posterior cerebral artery, R-VA = right vertebral artery.(A and B) Angiography showed that the stent was well positioned and there were no occluded branches or aneurysms.
Ethics statement
Informed written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.
Discussion
Intracranial vascular fenestration is a common anatomical variation, with an incidence of 0.3% to 0.9%.[ Fenestration refers to paired longitudinal nerve-artery fusion failure or bridging artery degeneration during embryonic development.[ Basilar artery fenestration is the 2nd most common intracranial artery fenestration after anterior communicating fenestration.[ Fenestration can occur at any part of the basilar artery, but it usually occurs at the proximal end near the vertebrobasilar artery junction. Although fenestration at the middle and distal portions has been reported, it is very rare.[ The incidence of basilar artery fenestration is 1% to 2.07% by magnetic resonance angiography, 0.28% to 6% by autopsy, and 0.02% to 0.6% by angiography.[Fenestration malformation may be associated with aneurysms, venous malformations, arteriovenous fistulas, cavernous hemangiomas, and smoking-related vascular changes; they may also be associated with cerebral ischemic events.[ Histologic changes have been found in fenestration-related deformities, including partial loss of the medial membrane at both ends of the fenestration, discontinuity of elastin near the fenestration, thickening of the subendothelial layer at the distal end with thinning of the proximal end, resulting in weakening of the arterial wall,[ and changes related to high-speed turbulence and high-shear-stress hemodynamics at the fenestration fork. These factors contribute to aneurysm formation and growth.[ Here, we report the very rare case of a patient with fenestration malformation and an aneurysm at the middle/distal junction of the basilar artery. The only case found in the PubMed database was previously reported by Tasker and Byrne.[This study reports the case of a patient with fenestration malformation and an aneurysm at the mid-distal junction of the basilar artery. The patient was diagnosed with distal fenestration malformation of the basilar artery by head DSA. The proximal end of the fenestration malformation lesion channel showed a nonuniform, filling, and lobulated aneurysm, in accordance with the characteristics of pseudoaneurysms.[ The formation of pseudoaneurysms after aneurysm rupture has been reported in the literature.[ Pseudoaneurysms do not have a normal vascular wall structure and are prone to rebleeding, endangering the patient's life.[ However, there are no similar reports in PubMed. Endovascular therapy is currently the best treatment for basilar artery fenestration with an aneurysm. However, the possibility of pseudoaneurysm formation needs to be excluded. Clinically, we consider sacrificing lesion channels therapeutic. Reports in the literature indicate that when angiography does not reveal the origin of the perforator of the fenestration passage and the anatomical relationship is complex, the fenestration passage can be sacrificed.[ Moreover, some studies have explored fenestration malformation at the vertebrobasilar artery junction with aneurysm occlusion and fenestration malformation channels. It should be noted that neurologic dysfunction can occur after surgery.[ Nonetheless, there have been no reports of cases in which the fenestration pathway in the middle and distal portions of the basilar artery was sacrificed in the presence of an aneurysm. In general, stent-assisted fenestration and channel occlusion are performed based on comprehensive consideration of the patient. In the case presented here, an Enterprise stent 4.5 × 22 mm in size was placed in the normal fenestration malformation channel; the 2 ends of the stent exceeded both ends of the fenestration malformation and completely covered the opening of both ends of the lesion channel.Spring coils were also placed in the fenestration lesion channel to prevent drift, which can lead to ischemic events. Because anticoagulants are not administered to patients with a ruptured aneurysm before surgery, in this case, an intravenous infusion of tirofiban was performed during the operation, and oral anticoagulants were administered after the operation to prevent thrombosis.[ After the surgery, the patient was lucid and had good limb movement, and there was no neurologic dysfunction. At 5 months after the operation, no abnormalities were found by head MRI, and head DSA showed no fenestration channels or aneurysms associated with the lesion.Fenestration in the middle and distal portions of the basilar artery is not common, and fenestration with an aneurysm is rare; hence, experience with interventional treatments for these conditions is relatively insufficient. In the diagnosis and treatment of basilar artery fenestration malformation with an aneurysm, physicians should be vigilant with regard to the possibility of pseudoaneurysm formation. When there are no perforating vessels in the fenestration channel and the lesion channel is nondominant, occlusion of the lesion channel is relatively safe.
Author contributions
Data curation: Yingli Feng.Methodology: Honglei Wang.Project administration: Honglei Wang.Writing – original draft: Donghuan Zhang.Writing – review & editing: Ning Xu.
Authors: Mira A Patel; Justin M Caplan; Wuyang Yang; Geoffrey P Colby; Alexander L Coon; Rafael J Tamargo; Judy Huang Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: F P Trivelato; D G Abud; G S Nakiri; L H de Castro Afonso; A C Ulhôa; L B Manzato; M T S Rezende Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Daniel L Cooke; Charles E Stout; Warren T Kim; Akash P Kansagra; John Paul Yu; Amy Gu; Nicholas P Jewell; Steven W Hetts; Randall T Higashida; Christopher F Dowd; Van V Halbach Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 1.610