Literature DB >> 31305376

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between a Triplane Proximal Femoral Osteotomy and the Modified Dunn Procedure for Stable, Moderate to Severe Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

Jakub Sikora-Klak1, James D Bomar2, Christina N Paik2, Dennis R Wenger2, Vidyadhar Upasani1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated the intra-articular cartilage and labral damage that can occur from the proximal femoral cam-like deformity of a moderate to severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). The approach to treating this deformity in a symptomatic Loder stable hip is controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare radiographic outcomes, complication rates, and revision rates between Imhauser type triplane proximal femoral osteotomy (TPFO) and the modified Dunn procedure (MDP).
METHODS: Twenty-six subjects with minimum 1-year follow-up were included (12 treated with a TPFO, and 14 treated with the MDP). A chart review was performed to capture data related to complications, revision procedures, surgical time, and body mass index. Radiographs were measured preoperatively and at final follow-up to evaluate epiphyseal-slip angle, neck-shaft angle, articular surface to trochanter distance, and medial proximal femoral angle.
RESULTS: Surgical time was shorter for the TPFO group (150.0±57.4 min) compared with the MDP group (203.8±30 min) (P=0.005). All preoperative and postoperative radiographic measures were similar between the 2 groups except postoperative neck-shaft angle, which was significantly less in the TPFO group (129.7±8.6 vs. 140.9±9.4 degrees) (P=0.005). There were no cases of femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) in the TPFO group. The modified Dunn group had a 29% AVN rate (P=0.1). The overall complication rate was similar between the TPFO (33%) and modified Dunn (36%) groups (P=1.0) and the reoperation rate was slightly greater in the TPFO group (33%) as compared with the modified Dunn group (21%) (P=0.67).
CONCLUSIONS: The complex 3-dimensional proximal femoral deformity of a moderate to severe SCFE can be difficult to treat with relatively high complication/reoperation rates observed in both TPFO and MDP groups. All 4 instances of AVN in this study of stable slips, however, were in the MDP group. As this can be a devastating complication leading to early total hip arthroplasty, we advise against the MDP in stable SCFE patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31305376     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Early and late complications and their management in slipped capital femoral epiphysis].

Authors:  F F Fernandez; O Eberhardt; T Wirth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing the modified Dunn procedure for slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Caroline Passaplan; Lucienne Gautier; Emanuel Gautier
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2020-10-27

Review 3.  Predicting epiphyseal stability of slipped capital femoral epiphysis with preoperative CT imaging.

Authors:  Megan E Fischer-Colbrie; Craig R Louer; James D Bomar; Peter Hahn; Eric W Edmonds; Andrew T Pennock; Vidyadhar V Upasani
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Epiphyseal Angulation and Related Spatial Orientation in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Theoretical Model and Biomechanical Explanation of Varus and Valgus Slip.

Authors:  Emanuel Gautier; Caroline Passaplan; Lucienne Gautier
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-12-23

5.  The modified Dunn procedure can be performed safely in stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis but does not alter avascular necrosis rates in unstable cases: a large single-centre cohort study.

Authors:  Oliver Birke; Justine St George; Paul J Gibbons; David G Little
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 6.  Surgical treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) by Dunn procedure modified by Ganz: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giulio Gorgolini; Alessandro Caterini; Kristian Efremov; Lidio Petrungaro; Fernando De Maio; Ernesto Ippolito; Pasquale Farsetti
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Prospective evaluation of in situ screw fixation for stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Clarabelle A DeVries; Raghav Badrinath; Samuel G Baird; James D Bomar; Vidyadhar V Upasani
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 1.917

8.  Treatment of chronic, stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis via surgical hip dislocation with combined osteochondroplasty and Imhauser osteotomy.

Authors:  J B Erickson; W P Samora; K E Klingele
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  Comparison between modified Dunn procedure and in situ fixation for severe stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Giovanni Trisolino; Stefano Stilli; Giovanni Gallone; Pedro Santos Leite; Giovanni Pignatti
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Alpha Angle as a Predictor of Impending Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in an Asian Population.

Authors:  Chloe Xiaoyun Chan; Youheng Ou Yang; Gloria Hui Min Cheng; Sumanth Kumar Gera; Ashik Bin Zainuddin Mohammad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.