| Literature DB >> 31303817 |
Claudia Juliano1, Mauro Marchetti2, Paolo Campagna3, Marianna Usai4.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the chemical composition and the antimicrobial activity of essential oils of Helichrysum microphyllum subsp. tyrrhenicum collected in four different stations in South-Western Sardinia. The composition of the essential oils was determined by gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The oil samples showed different chromatographic profiles. The oil of the station 4 revealed the presence of significant amount of neryl acetate (33.6%); in oils from stations 1 and 2 we found γ-curcumene (28%) and in station 3 γ-curcumene (12%) and linalool (11%), while there was no trace of neryl acetate. Standard microbiological assays demonstrated that essential oils obtained by plants collected in station 1 and 2, very rich in curcumene, showed an interesting anticandidal activity, dose- and time-dependent, which is enhanced by sub-inhibitory concentrations of chitosan. Our results suggest that the essential oil of Helichrysum microphyllum subsp. tyrrhenicum, associated with chitosan in innovative formulations, could be considered as a therapeutic alternative in the treatment of Candida opportunistic infections. The results of this study shows that the chemotypization of the species examined could lead to their targeted clinical use, in a concept of a rational scientific aromatherapy.Entities:
Keywords: Anticandidal activity; Antimicrobial activity; Chitosan; Curcumene; Essential oil composition; H. microphyllum subsp. tyrrhenicum
Year: 2018 PMID: 31303817 PMCID: PMC6601027 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.04.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Essential oils composition (%) of H. microphyllum subsp. tyrrhenicum.
| Samples | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RI | Compounds | Station 1 (Iglesias) | Station 2 (Carbonia) | Station 3 (Portoscuso) | Station 4 (Oristano) | References | |||
| 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.42 | ||||||
| Exp. | Lit. | ||||||||
| 940 | 939 | MH | α-pinene | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.42 ± 0.04 | nd | Std | |
| 950 | 953 | MH | α-fenchene | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | nd | Std | |
| 956 | 954 | MH | camphene | nd | nd | 0.05 ± 0.01 | nd | Std | |
| 991 | 991 | MH | β-myrcene | nd | nd | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | Std | |
| 1031 | 1029 | MH | (+)-limonene | 5.28 ± 0.01 | 7.33 ± 0.05 | 4.14 ± 0.03 | 1.19 ± 0.01 | Std | |
| 1039 | 1042 | MH | α-ocimene | nd | 0.99 ± 0.02 | 0.39 ± 0.02 | nd | RI, MS | |
| 1075 | 1089 | MH | α-terpinolene | 0.80 ± 0.04 | nd | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | Std | |
| 1093 | 1090 | No TCC | 2-nonanone | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.65 ± 0.01 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | nd | RI, MS | |
| 1095 | 1097 | OM | linalool | 14.21 ± 0.03 | 11.66 ± 0.01 | 11.47 ± 0.02 | 3.16 ± 0.02 | Std | |
| 1102 | 1100 | AE | isopentyl-2-methylbutanoate | 0.71 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | nd | RI, MS | |
| 1142 | 1144 | No TCC | ( | 4.48 ± 0.04 | 3.28 ± 0.02 | 1.72 ± 0.01 | 0.84 ± 0.01 | RI, MS | |
| 1152 | 1152 | No TCC | ( | 1.49 ± 0.02 | 2.46 ± 0.02 | 1.57 ± 0.01 | nd | RI, MS | |
| 1162 | 1166 | OM | δ-terpineol | 1.65 ± 0.02 | nd | nd | 0.79 ± 0.03 | RI, MS | |
| 1180 | 1160 | No TCC | 4,6-dimethyloctan-3,5-dione | 1.62 ± 0.02 | 0.94 ± 0.01 | 1.59 ± 0.01 | 0.92 ± 0.01 | RI, MS | |
| 1190 | 1189 | OM | α-terpineol | 0.55 ± 0.02 | 0.48 ± 0.02 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | Std | |
| 1301 | 1298 | OM | geranyl formate | nd | nd | nd | 4.93 ± 0.05 | RI, MS | |
| 1353 | 1351 | SH | α-cubebene | nd | nd | 1.31 ± 0.02 | nd | Std | |
| 1366 | 1362 | OM | neryl acetate | nd | nd | nd | 33.60 ± 0.04 | Std | |
| 1405 | 1405 | SH | di- | 1.54 ± 0.01 | 6.08 ± 0.02 | 3.35 ± 0.03 | 1.37 ± 0.01 | RI, MS | |
| 1409 | 1412 | SH | α-cedrene | 4.17 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 3.52 ± 0.02 | Std | |
| 1415 | 1413 | SH | 2.10 ± 0.01 | 2.79 ± 0.03 | 0.77 ± 0.01 | 1.41 ± 0.02 | Std | ||
| 1421 | 1419 | SH | ( | 2.01 ± 0.01 | 1.64 ± 0.01 | 2.98 ± 0.03 | 0.80 ± 0.01 | Std | |
| 1435 | 1435 | SH | 1.60 ± 0.02 | 1.75 ± 0.02 | 0.65 ± 0.01 | 1.08 ± 0.02 | Std | ||
| 1439 | 1440 | SH | α-guaiene | nd | nd | 0.26 ± 0.04 | nd | RI, MS | |
| 1443 | 1441 | SH | aromadendrene | nd | nd | 0.50 ± 0.02 | nd | RI, MS | |
| 1454 | 1455 | SH | α-humulene | nd | nd | 0.40 ± 0.05 | nd | Std | |
| 1459 | 1457 | SH | ( | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.01 | 0.41 ± 0.01 | 7.58 ± 0.03 | Std | |
| 1460 | 1460 | SH | alloaromadendrene | 1.38 ± 0.02 | 1.08 ± 0.04 | 2.25 ± 0.02 | 1.21 ± 0.03 | RI, MS | |
| 1465 | 1463 | SH | dehydroaromadendrene | 0.50 ± 0.03 | 0.53 ± 0.03 | 0.39 ± 0.01 | nd | RI, MS | |
| 1480 | 1483 | SH | γ-curcumene | 28.94 ± 0.02 | 28.22 ± 0.02 | 12.22 ± 0.03 | 11.08 ± 0.01 | RI, MS | |
| 1483 | 1486 | SH | ar-curcumene | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 4.69 ± 0.01 | 3.12 ± 0.03 | nd | RI, MS | |
| 1490 | 1495 | ArE | phenethyl isovalerate | 1.27 ± 0.03 | 1.38 ± 0.01 | 0.75 ± 0.02 | nd | RI, MS | |
| 1495 | No TCC | tricyclo[M,N,O,Pxy]undec-2-en-4-one | 1.03 ± 0.02 | 0.81 ± 0.03 | 0.63 ± 0.01 | nd | MS | ||
| 1497 | 1498 | SH | β-selinene | nd | 1.42 ± 0.01 | 1.39 ± 0.03 | nd | Std | |
| 1500 | 1500 | SH | α-muurolene | 1.50 ± 0.05 | 1.78 ± 0.02 | 2.44 ± 0.02 | 0.96 ± 0.02 | Std | |
| 1508 | 1506 | SH | β-bisabolene | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 0.63 ± 0.02 | nd | 0.48 ± 0.02 | Std | |
| 1514 | 1522 | SH | 7- | 1.83 ± 0.02 | 1.50 ± 0.02 | 1.40 ± 0.01 | 1.61 ± 0.03 | RI, MS | |
| 1514 | 1514 | SH | γ-cadinene | 0.95 ± 0.01 | 0.70 ± 0.01 | 3.29 ± 0.01 | nd | Std | |
| 1522 | 1523 | SH | δ-cadinene | 1.65 ± 0.03 | 1.19 ± 0.02 | 4.45 ± 0.02 | 0.51 ± 0.01 | Std | |
| 1523 | SH | 7- | nd | nd | 0.55 ± 0.02 | nd | MS | ||
| 1542 | 1546 | SH | α-calacorene | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 0.81 ± 0.03 | 0.74 ± 0.02 | 0.67 ± 0.02 | RI, MS | |
| 1547 | SH | 4,5,9,10-dehydro-isolongifolene | nd | nd | 1.96 ± 0.01 | nd | MS | ||
| 1549 | 1547 | SH | selina-3,7(11)diene | nd | nd | 1.01 ± 0.03 | nd | RI, MS | |
| 1563 | 1567 | OM | 0.45 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 5.07 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | Std | ||
| 1590 | 1585 | OS | globulol | nd | nd | 0.29 ± 0.03 | nd | RI, MS | |
| 1597 | 1601 | OS | guaiol | 1.88 ± 0.02 | 1.42 ± 0.02 | 2.08 ± 0.01 | 1.33 ± 0.02 | Std | |
| 1618 | 1619 | OS | 1,10-di-epi-cubenol | 0.38 ± 0.01 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 0.47 ± 0.02 | 0.37 ± 0.01 | RI, MS | |
| 1621 | OS | 5-eudesmen-11-ol | 9.81 ± 0.04 | 7.39 ± 0.02 | 10.35 ± 0.02 | 4.34 ± 0.01 | MS | ||
| 1624 | 1624 | OS | 10-epi-γ-eudesmol | 1.05 ± 0.01 | 0.75 ± 0.01 | 0.39 ± 0.03 | 1.52 ± 0.01 | RI, MS | |
| 1647 | 1651 | OS | β-eudesmol | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 0.36 ± 0.03 | 1.06 ± 0.01 | 1.64 ± 0.01 | Std | |
| 1654 | 1654 | OS | α-eudesmol | 0.90 ± 0.02 | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 0.98 ± 0.03 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | Std | |
| 1662 | 1658 | OS | patchouli alcohol | 0.47 ± 0.02 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 0.40 ± 0.06 | Std | |
| Total | 99.73 | 98.44 | 91.62 | 88.97 | |||||
Data are the mean of three replicates ± SD. Not detected compouns were indicated as nd.
RI by comparison of retention index with those reported in literature.
Std by comparison of the retention time and mass spectrum of available authentic standards.
Identification methods: MS by comparison of the Mass spectrum with those of the computer mass libraries Adams, Nist 11 and by interpretation of the mass spectra fragmentations.
Yield of essential oils calculated on fresh material.
MH = Monoterpene Hydrocarbon; No TCC = No Terpenic Carmonil Compound; OM = Oxygenated Monoterpene; AE = Aliphatic Ester; SH = Sesquiterpene Hydrocarbon; OS = Oxygenate sesquiterpene; ArE = Aromatic Ester.
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (M.I.C.) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (in brackets; M.B.C.) of essential oil 1 and chlorhexidine diacetate against a panel of standard bacteria.
| Essential oil Sample 1 | Chlorhexidine diacetate | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 (4) mg ml−1 | 0.90 (3.90) μg ml−1 | |
| >4 mg ml−1 | 1.96 (15.6) μg ml−1 | |
| >4 mg ml−1 | 21.9 (125) μg ml−1 |
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (M.I.C.) and Minimum Candidacidal Concentration (in brackets; M.C.C.) of samples of H. microphyllum subsp. tyrrhenicum essential oils and chlorhexidine diacetate.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Chlorhexidine diacetate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.75 (1.75) mg ml−1 | 1 (2) mg ml−1 | 2 (2) mg ml−1 | 2 (4) mg ml−1 | 7.8 (7.8) μg ml−1 | |
| 0.5 (2) mg ml−1 | 0.5 (2) mg ml−1 | 4 (4) mg ml−1 | 2 (4) mg ml−1 | 7.8 (7.8) μg ml−1 | |
| 1 (2) mg ml−1 | 1 (2) mg ml−1 | 4 (>4) mg ml−1 | 2 (>4) mg ml−1 | 7.8 (7.8) μg ml−1 | |
| 1 (2) mg ml−1 | 1 (2) m ml−1 | 4 (4) mg ml−1 | 4 (4) mg ml−1 | 7.8 (7.8) μg ml−1 |
Effect of H. microphyllum subsp. tyrrhenicum 1 essential oil on mycelial growth of Aspergillus brasiliensis ATCC 16,404 (after a week of incubation).
| Control | 100% |
|---|---|
| Control PEG 200 | 100% |
| E.O. 0.25 mg/ml | 76% |
| E.O. 0.50 mg/ml | 70% |
| E.O. 1 mg/ml | 51% |
| E.O. 2 mg/ml | 0% |
Fig. 1Time-kill curves of C. albicans ATCC 10,231 in PBS in the presence of different H. microphyllum subsp. tyrrhenicum 1 essential oils concentrations (mean of 3 experiments).
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (M.IC.) and Minimum Candidacidal Concentration (M.C.C.) of chitosan, H. microphyllum subsp. tyrrhenicum essential oil 1, and H. microphyllum subsp. tyrrhenicum essential oil 1 in the presence of sub-inhibitory chitosan concentrations.
| M.I.C. | M.C.C. | |
|---|---|---|
| E.O. | 0.75 mg ml−1 | 1.75 mg ml−1 |
| CHITOSAN | 1 mg ml−1 | 1 mg ml−1 |
| E.O. | 0.094 mg ml−1 | 0.125 mg ml−1 |
| E.O. | 0.250 mg ml−1 | 0.375 mg ml−1 |
Fig. 2PCA analysis and loading plot of PCA of essential oil of listed H. microphyllum subsp. tyrrhenicum samples.