| Literature DB >> 31303738 |
Shikha Mali1, Shilpy Singla1, Arun Sharma1, Ankit Gautam2, Babita Niranjan3, Shantanu Jain4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pulpotomy is the treatment for cariously exposed vital primary molars. UsingfFormocresol as a pulpotomy agent is been in controversy, which has triggered the search for better alternatives. The product like 'Myristica fragrans (MF)-Nutmeg gel, Terminalia chebula (TC)-Myrobolan gel is gaining popularity as herbal pulpotomy agents. AIM: To evaluate and compare clinical and radiographical success of herbal gels Myristica fragrans (MF)-Nutmeg, and Terminalia chebula (TC)-Myrobolan as pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth.Entities:
Keywords: Formocresol; Myristica fragrans; Primary teeth; Pulpotomy; Terminalia chebula
Year: 2018 PMID: 31303738 PMCID: PMC6611537 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1565
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Clin Pediatr Dent ISSN: 0974-7052
Clinical outcomes of formocresol, nutmeg and myrobolan at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
| 20 (100%) | 8 (80%) | 10 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | |
| 20 (100%) | 10 (100%) | 10 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | |
| 20 (100%) | 8 (80%) | 10 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | |
| 20 (100%) | 8 (80%) | 10 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | |
| 20 (100%) | 8 (80%) | 10 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | |
| 14 (70%) | 6 (60%) | 8 (80%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | |
| 14 (70%) | 06 (60%) | 08 (80%) | 14 (100%) | 06 (100%) | 8 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 06 (100%) | 8 (100%) | |
| Yates’χ[ | Test not applicable as all samples in three groups showed success | Test not applicable as all samples in three groups showed success | |||||||
Radiographic outcomes of formocresol, nutmeg and myrobolan at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
| 18 (90%) | 8 (80%) | 10 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | |
| 20 (100%) | 10 (100%) | 10 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | |
| 20 (100%) | 10 (100%) | 10 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | |
| 20 (100%) | 10 (100%) | 10 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 8 (100%) | |
| 18 (90%) | 8 (80%) | 10 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 06 (100%) | 8 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 06 (100%) | 8 (100%) | |
| Yates’χ[ | Test not applicable as all samples in three groups showed success | Test not applicable as all samples in three groups showed success | |||||||
Overall success rate of formocresol, nutmeg and myrobolan at 3, 6 and 12 months
| Overall success rate | 14 (70%) | 06 (60%) | 08 (80%) | 14 (100%) | 06 (100%) | 8 (100%) | 14 (100%) | 06 (100%) | 8 (100%) |