Literature DB >> 31303316

Arginine-stimulated copeptin measurements in the differential diagnosis of diabetes insipidus: a prospective diagnostic study.

Bettina Winzeler1, Nicole Cesana-Nigro2, Julie Refardt2, Deborah R Vogt3, Cornelia Imber2, Benedict Morin2, Milica Popovic2, Michelle Steinmetz2, Clara O Sailer2, Gabor Szinnai4, Irina Chifu5, Martin Fassnacht6, Mirjam Christ-Crain2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis of diabetes insipidus is challenging. The most reliable approach is hypertonic saline-stimulated copeptin measurements. However, this test is based on the induction of hypernatraemia and requires close monitoring of plasma sodium concentrations. Arginine-stimulated copeptin measurements might provide an alternative, simple, and safe test.
METHODS: In this prospective diagnostic study, we recruited a development cohort from University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland, and a validation cohort from five centres in Basel, Aarau, Luzern, Bern, and St Gallen, Switzerland, and the University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. For both cohorts, patients were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 18 years or older, were newly referred with polyuria (>50 mL/kg bodyweight per day) or had a known diagnosis of central diabetes insipidus or primary polydipsia. We also recruited a comparator cohort of healthy controls in parallel to each cohort, comprising adults (aged 18 years and older, with normal drinking habits, and no history of polyuria) and children who underwent arginine stimulation to diagnose growth hormone deficiency (children were only included in the comparator cohort to the development cohort as proof of concept). Patients and healthy controls underwent arginine stimulation with measurement of plasma copeptin at baseline and 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min. The primary objective in the development cohort was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of plasma copeptin concentrations to discriminate between diabetes insipidus and primary polydipsia, and in the validation cohort was to confirm those results. Adverse effects of the test were monitored in all participants, with tolerability of the test rated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) that ranged from no (0) to maximum (10) discomfort. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00757276.
FINDINGS: Between May 24, 2013, and Jan 11, 2017, 52 patients were enrolled in the development cohort (12 [23%] with complete diabetes insipidus, nine [17%] with partial diabetes insipidus, and 31 [60%] with primary polydipsia) alongside 20 healthy adults and 42 child controls. Between Oct 24, 2017, and June 27, 2018, 46 patients were enrolled in the validation cohort (12 [26%] with complete diabetes insipidus, seven [15%] with partial diabetes insipidus, and 27 [59%] with primary polydipsia) alongside 30 healthy adult controls (two patients in this cohort were excluded from the main analysis because of early vomiting during the test). In the pooled patient and control datasets, median arginine-stimulated copeptin concentrations increased in healthy adult controls (from 5·2 pM [IQR 3·3-10·9] to a maximum of 9·8 pM [6·4-19·6]) and in participants with primary polydipsia (from 3·6 pM [IQR 2·4-5·7] to a maximum of 7·9 pM [5·1-11·8]), but only minimally in those with diabetes insipidus (2·1 pM [IQR 1·9-2·7] to a maximum of 2·5 pM [1·9-3·1]). In the development cohort, a cutoff of 3·5 pM at 60 min provided the highest diagnostic accuracy of 94% (95% CI 84-98). The accuracy of this cutoff in the validation cohort was 86% (95% CI 73-94). By pooling the data from both cohorts, an optimal accuracy of 93% (95% CI 86-97) was reached at a cutoff of 3·8 pM copeptin at 60 min (sensitivity 93%, 95% CI 86-98; specificity 92%, 95% CI 84-100). The test was safe and well tolerated, with median VAS scores of 3·5 (IQR 2-4) in patients with diabetes insipidus, 3 (2-4) in those with primary polydipsia, 1 (1-3) in healthy adults, and 1 (0-5) in healthy children in the pooled participant dataset.
INTERPRETATION: Arginine-stimulated copeptin measurements are an innovative test for diabetes insipidus with high diagnostic accuracy, and could be a simplified, novel, and safe diagnostic approach to diabetes insipidus in clinical practice. FUNDING: Swiss National Science Foundation and University Hospital Basel.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31303316     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31255-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  14 in total

1.  Changing the diagnostic approach to diabetes insipidus: role of copeptin.

Authors:  Anna Grandone; Pierluigi Marzuillo; Giuseppa Patti; Silverio Perrotta; Mohamad Maghnie
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

2.  Urinary symptoms: broadening the horizons for the copeptin assay.

Authors:  T F Monaghan; D L Bliwise; A J Wein
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 3.  Diagnosis and Management of Central Diabetes Insipidus in Adults.

Authors:  Maria Tomkins; Sarah Lawless; Julie Martin-Grace; Mark Sherlock; Chris J Thompson
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 6.134

Review 4.  The Emerging Role of Copeptin.

Authors:  R Jalleh; D J Torpy
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2021-02

Review 5.  Vasopressin and Copeptin in health and disease.

Authors:  Mirjam Christ-Crain
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  Validity of different copeptin assays in the differential diagnosis of the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome.

Authors:  Clara Odilia Sailer; Julie Refardt; Claudine Angela Blum; Ingeborg Schnyder; Jose Alberto Molina-Tijeras; Wiebke Fenske; Mirjam Christ-Crain
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Central Diabetes Insipidus: Looking for the Needle in the Haystack or a Very Rare Side-Effect to Promptly Diagnose?

Authors:  Agnese Barnabei; Lidia Strigari; Andrea Corsello; Rosa Maria Paragliola; Luca Falzone; Roberto Salvatori; Salvatore Maria Corsello; Francesco Torino
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Oxytocin levels in response to pituitary provocation tests in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Clara O Sailer; Bettina Winzeler; Sandrine A Urwyler; Ingeborg Schnyder; Julie Refardt; Anne Eckert; Nimmy Varghese; Martin Fassnacht; Irina Chifu; Elizabeth A Lawson; Joseph G Verbalis; Wiebke Fenske; Mirjam Christ-Crain
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 6.558

9.  Psychogenic polydipsia in a female adolescent without a psychiatric background: A case report.

Authors:  Elise Nauwynck; Karolien Van De Maele; Jesse Vanbesien; Willem Staels; Jean De Schepper; Inge Gies
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2021-02-27

10.  Distribution of plasma copeptin levels and influence of obesity in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Gerdi Tuli; Jessica Munarin; Daniele Tessaris; Silvia Einaudi; Patrizia Matarazzo; Luisa de Sanctis
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.