Literature DB >> 31303171

From matrimonial practices to genetic diversity in Southeast Asian populations: the signature of the matrilineal puzzle.

Goki Ly1, Romain Laurent1, Sophie Lafosse1, Chou Monidarin2, Gérard Diffloth3, Frédéric Bourdier4, Olivier Evrard5, Bruno Toupance1, Samuel Pavard1, Raphaëlle Chaix1.   

Abstract

In matrilineal populations, the descent group affiliation is transmitted by women whereas the socio-political power frequently remains in the hands of men. This situation, named the 'matrilineal puzzle', is expected to promote local endogamy as a coping mechanism allowing men to maintain their decision-making power over their natal descent group. In this paper, we revisit this 'matrilineal puzzle' from a population genetics' point of view. Indeed, such tendency for local endogamy in matrilineal populations is expected to increase their genetic inbreeding and generate isolation-by-distance patterns between villages. To test this hypothesis, we collected ethno-demographic data for 3261 couples and high-density genetic data for 675 individuals from 11 Southeast Asian populations with a wide range of social organizations: matrilineal and matrilocal populations (M), patrilineal and patrilocal populations (P) or cognatic populations with predominant matrilocal residence (C). We observed that M and C populations have higher levels of village endogamy than P populations, and that such higher village endogamy leads to higher genetic inbreeding. M populations also exhibit isolation-by-distance patterns between villages. We interpret such genetic patterns as the signature of the 'matrilineal puzzle'. Notably, our results suggest that any form of matrilocal marriage (whatever the descent rule is) increases village endogamy. These findings suggest that male dominance, when combined with matrilocality, constrains inter-village migrations, and constitutes an underexplored cultural process shaping genetic patterns in human populations. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  human genetics; inbreeding; matrilineal puzzle; matrilocal; patrilocal; residence rule

Year:  2019        PMID: 31303171      PMCID: PMC6664126          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  34 in total

1.  A linear complexity phasing method for thousands of genomes.

Authors:  Olivier Delaneau; Jonathan Marchini; Jean-François Zagury
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Evolutionary contributions to solving the "matrilineal puzzle": a test of Holden, Sear, and Mace's model.

Authors:  Siobhán M Mattison
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2011-05-31

3.  Evaluation of saliva as a source of human DNA for population and association studies.

Authors:  Dominique Quinque; Ralf Kittler; Manfred Kayser; Mark Stoneking; Ivan Nasidze
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Isolation by Distance.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1943-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  From social to genetic structures in central Asia.

Authors:  Raphaëlle Chaix; Lluís Quintana-Murci; Tatyana Hegay; Michael F Hammer; Zahra Mobasher; Frédéric Austerlitz; Evelyne Heyer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Larger mitochondrial DNA than Y-chromosome differences between matrilocal and patrilocal groups from Sumatra.

Authors:  Ellen Dröfn Gunnarsdóttir; Madhusudan R Nandineni; Mingkun Li; Sean Myles; David Gil; Brigitte Pakendorf; Mark Stoneking
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Consanguinity around the world: what do the genomic data of the HGDP-CEPH diversity panel tell us?

Authors:  Anne-Louise Leutenegger; Mourad Sahbatou; Steven Gazal; Howard Cann; Emmanuelle Génin
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 8.  Sex-specific demographic behaviours that shape human genomic variation.

Authors:  E Heyer; R Chaix; S Pavard; F Austerlitz
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Relaxed Observance of Traditional Marriage Rules Allows Social Connectivity without Loss of Genetic Diversity.

Authors:  Elsa G Guillot; Martin L Hazelton; Tatiana M Karafet; J Stephen Lansing; Herawati Sudoyo; Murray P Cox
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Genetic variation in Northern Thailand Hill Tribes: origins and relationships with social structure and linguistic differences.

Authors:  Davide Besaggio; Silvia Fuselli; Metawee Srikummool; Jatupol Kampuansai; Loredana Castrì; Chris Tyler-Smith; Mark Seielstad; Daoroong Kangwanpong; Giorgio Bertorelle
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  2 in total

1.  The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals.

Authors:  Siobhán M Mattison; Mary K Shenk; Melissa Emery Thompson; Monique Borgerhoff Mulder; Laura Fortunato
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Sex-linked genetic diversity originates from persistent sociocultural processes at microgeographic scales.

Authors:  Ning Ning Chung; Guy S Jacobs; Herawati Sudoyo; Safarina G Malik; Lock Yue Chew; J Stephen Lansing; Murray P Cox
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.963

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.