Literature DB >> 31303166

Cooperation beyond consanguinity: post-marital residence, delineations of kin and social support among South Indian Tamils.

Eleanor A Power1, Elspeth Ready2.   

Abstract

Evolutionary ecologists have shown that relatives are important providers of support across many species. Among humans, cultural reckonings of kinship are more than just relatedness, as they interact with systems of descent, inheritance, marriage and residence. These cultural aspects of kinship may be particularly important when a person is determining which kin, if any, to call upon for help. Here, we explore the relationship between kinship and cooperation by drawing upon social support network data from two villages in South India. While these Tamil villages have a nominally male-biased kinship system (being patrilocal and patrilineal), matrilateral kin play essential social roles and many women reside in their natal villages, letting us tease apart the relative importance of genetic relatedness, kinship and residence in accessing social support. We find that people often name both their consanguineal and affinal kin as providing them with support, and we see some weakening of support with lesser relatedness. Matrilateral and patrilateral relatives are roughly equally likely to be named, and the greatest distinction instead is in their availability, which is highly contingent on post-marital residence patterns. People residing in their natal village have many more consanguineal relatives present than those who have relocated. Still, relocation has only a small effect on an individual's network size, as non-natal residents are more reliant on the few kin that they have present, most of whom are affines. In sum, marriage patterns have an important impact on kin availability, but the flexibility offered by the broadening of the concept of kin helps people develop the cooperative relationships that they rely upon, even in the absence of genetic relatives. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  kinship; networks; post-marital residence; relatedness; social support

Year:  2019        PMID: 31303166      PMCID: PMC6664129          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  20 in total

1.  Sharing the wealth: the effect of siblings on adults' wealth ownership.

Authors:  Lisa A Keister
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2003-08

2.  Evolutionary contributions to solving the "matrilineal puzzle": a test of Holden, Sear, and Mace's model.

Authors:  Siobhán M Mattison
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2011-05-31

Review 3.  The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups.

Authors:  Joan B Silk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Kinship, lineage, and an evolutionary perspective on cooperative hunting groups in Indonesia.

Authors:  Michael S Alvard
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2003-06

5.  Understanding cooperation through fitness interdependence.

Authors:  Athena Aktipis; Lee Cronk; Joe Alcock; Jessica D Ayers; Cristina Baciu; Daniel Balliet; Amy M Boddy; Oliver Scott Curry; Jaimie Arona Krems; Andrés Muñoz; Daniel Sullivan; Daniel Sznycer; Gerald S Wilkinson; Pamela Winfrey
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-07

6.  Genetic and cultural kinship among the Lamaleran whale hunters.

Authors:  Michael Alvard
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2011-07

7.  Inclusive fitness: 50 years on.

Authors:  Andy Gardner; Stuart A West
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Land inheritance establishes sibling competition for marriage and reproduction in rural Ethiopia.

Authors:  Mhairi A Gibson; Eshetu Gurmu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Social bonds in the dispersing sex: partner preferences among adult female chimpanzees.

Authors:  Steffen Foerster; Karen McLellan; Kara Schroepfer-Walker; Carson M Murray; Christopher Krupenye; Ian C Gilby; Anne E Pusey
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure.

Authors:  Kim R Hill; Robert S Walker; Miran Bozicević; James Eder; Thomas Headland; Barry Hewlett; A Magdalena Hurtado; Frank Marlowe; Polly Wiessner; Brian Wood
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

1.  Differences between sons and daughters in the intergenerational transmission of wealth.

Authors:  Monique Borgerhoff Mulder; Mary C Towner; Ryan Baldini; Bret A Beheim; Samuel Bowles; Heidi Colleran; Michael Gurven; Karen L Kramer; Siobhán M Mattison; David A Nolin; Brooke A Scelza; Eric Schniter; Rebecca Sear; Mary K Shenk; Eckart Voland; John Ziker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals.

Authors:  Siobhán M Mattison; Mary K Shenk; Melissa Emery Thompson; Monique Borgerhoff Mulder; Laura Fortunato
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Social Support and Network Formation in a Small-Scale Horticulturalist Population.

Authors:  Cohen R Simpson
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 8.501

4.  In-Law Relationships in Evolutionary Perspective: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.

Authors:  Martin Daly; Gretchen Perry
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-06-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.