Literature DB >> 31302895

Multimodal Analysis of FDA Drug Safety Communications: Lessons from Zolpidem.

Aaron S Kesselheim1, Michael S Sinha2, Eric G Campbell3, Sebastian Schneeweiss2, Paula Rausch4, Brian M Lappin4, Esther H Zhou4, Jerry Avorn2, Gerald J Dal Pan5.   

Abstract

Because clinical trials conducted for US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval occur in carefully monitored settings and often have strict inclusion criteria for participation, new information about drug safety is commonly discovered once a medication is FDA approved and used by larger numbers of patients. The FDA issues Drug Safety Communications when new information arises about the safety of marketed drugs that may change decision making by healthcare providers and patients. Since their inception, over 250 Drug Safety Communications have been issued alerting consumers and prescribers in the USA about safety risks related to prescription and over-the-counter medications. Researchers at the Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston in conjunction with officials from the FDA undertook a multi-modal study of the content, dissemination, and uptake of FDA messaging, focusing on two 2013 Drug Safety Communications related to zolpidem (Ambien; Sanofi, Paris, France). Traditional and social media analyses note incomplete dissemination of key DSC messages. Surveys of patients and interviews of physicians and patients suggest important limitations in patient-provider communication that have hindered sharing of safety information with patients. Finally, pharmacoepidemiologic analyses of zolpidem dispensing patterns after the Drug Safety Communications were released suggest possible opportunities for enhancing uptake of new safety knowledge that may lead to changes in clinical practice, where appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31302895     DOI: 10.1007/s40264-019-00849-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  26 in total

1.  Timing of new black box warnings and withdrawals for prescription medications.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Paul D Allen; Steffie J Woolhandler; David U Himmelstein; Sidney M Wolfe; David H Bor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy after natalizumab therapy for Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Gert Van Assche; Marc Van Ranst; Raf Sciot; Bénédicte Dubois; Séverine Vermeire; Maja Noman; Jannick Verbeeck; Karel Geboes; Wim Robberecht; Paul Rutgeerts
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Communicating the risks of medicines: time to move forward.

Authors:  Gerald J Dal Pan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Media Coverage of FDA Drug Safety Communications about Zolpidem: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Steve Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz; Sara Dejene; Paula Rausch; Gerald J Dal Pan; Esther H Zhou; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2017-03-24

5.  Patient and Physician Perceptions of Drug Safety Information for Sleep Aids: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Sarah A McGraw; Sara Z Dejene; Paula Rausch; Gerald J Dal Pan; Brian M Lappin; Esther H Zhou; Jerry Avorn; Eric G Campbell
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Impact of a US Food and Drug Administration Drug Safety Communication on Zolpidem Dosing: An Observational Retrospective Cohort.

Authors:  Jonathan L Harward; Valerie B Clinard; Michael R Jiroutek; Beverly H Lingerfeldt; Andrew J Muzyk
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2015-03-05

7.  The US Food and Drug Administration's drug safety recommendations and long-acting beta2-agonist dispensing pattern changes in adult asthma patients: 2003-2012.

Authors:  Esther H Zhou; Sally Seymour; Margie R Goulding; Elizabeth M Kang; Jacqueline M Major; Solomon Iyasu
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2017-03-16

8.  Advancing the field of pharmaceutical risk minimization through application of implementation science best practices.

Authors:  Meredith Y Smith; Elaine Morrato
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Consumer Understanding, Preferences, and Responses to Different Versions of Drug Safety Messages in the United States: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lauren McCormack; R Craig Lefebvre; Carla Bann; Olivia Taylor; Paula Rausch
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Changes in the utilization of osteoporosis drugs after the 2010 FDA bisphosphonate drug safety communication.

Authors:  Bander Balkhi; Enrique Seoane-Vazquez; Rosa Rodriguez-Monguio
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  2 in total

1.  Changes in emergency department visits for zolpidem-attributed adverse drug reactions after FDA Drug Safety Communications.

Authors:  Andrew I Geller; Esther H Zhou; Daniel S Budnitz; Maribeth C Lovegrove; Gerald J Dal Pan
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Drug Safety Issues Covered by Lay Media: A Cohort Study of Direct Healthcare Provider Communications Sent between 2001 and 2015 in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Esther de Vries; Petra Denig; Sieta T de Vries; Taco B M Monster; Jacqueline G Hugtenburg; Peter G M Mol
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.606

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.