| Literature DB >> 31302702 |
Roger Bayston1, Waheed Ashraf1, Ivan Pelegrin1,2, Katherine Fowkes3, Alison S Bienemann4, William G B Singleton4,5, Ian S Scott3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: External ventricular drainage (EVD) carries a high risk of ventriculitis, increasingly caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter baumannii. Existing antimicrobial EVD catheters are not effective against these, and we have developed a catheter with activity against MDR bacteria and demonstrated the safety of the new formulation for use in the brain.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31302702 PMCID: PMC6753475 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkz293
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother ISSN: 0305-7453 Impact factor: 5.790
Figure 1.(a and b) Scanning electron micrographs (×10000) of the lumens of catheters after four weekly bacteria challenges followed by 6–7 days of perfusion. (a) Control catheter after challenge with K. pneumoniae NB914, at Day 7 of challenge 4. (b) Control catheter after challenge with MRSA F1836, at Day 7 of challenge 4. (c) Magnification of ×500. Lumen of the processed catheter after challenge with MRSA F1836, at Day 7 of challenge 4. The lower magnification was used to enable a more extensive field. (d) Magnification of ×10000. Lumen surface of (c) with no visible bacteria remaining. No bacteria were recovered after prolonged perfusion and agar culture.
Results of four weekly challenges with MRSA F1836, showing on each challenge rising bacterial counts in the control catheter and no growth from the antimicrobial catheters
| Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 6 | Day 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0, challenge 1 | |||||
| control | 3.6 × 104 | 3.9 × 105 | 7.5 × 106 | 4.8 × 107 | 4.8 × 108 |
| test 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Day 0, challenge 2 | |||||
| control | 2.8 × 104 | 7.5 × 106 | 1.5 × 107 | 4.5 × 107 | 1.1 × 108 |
| test 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Day 0, challenge 3 | |||||
| control | 3.9 × 105 | 3.6 × 106 | 2.5 × 107 | 2.1 × 107 | 1.0 × 108 |
| test 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Day 0, challenge 4 | |||||
| control | 2.5 × 105 | 6.5 × 106 | 6.6 × 107 | 2.5 × 108 | 1.1 × 108 |
| test 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A value of 0 corresponds to a value that was below the lower limit of detection.
The negative cultures remained in the antimicrobial catheters throughout the four weekly challenges and each post-challenge perfusion (7 days).
Results of four weekly challenges with A. baumannii NB893, showing on each challenge rising bacterial counts in the control catheter to the point where they became obstructed by biofilm by Day 7
| Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 6 | Day 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0, challenge 1 | |||||
| control | 1.3 × 107 | 1.8 × 107 | 2.9 × 108 | 4.3 × 108 | blocked |
| test 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Day 0, challenge 2 | |||||
| control | 2.8 × 107 | 3.2 × 107 | 2.3 × 107 | 1.9 × 108 | blocked |
| test 1 | 80 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 2 | 275 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 3 | 65 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Day 0, challenge 3 | |||||
| control | 2.7 × 107 | 1.5 × 108 | 5.4 × 108 | 4.9 × 108 | blocked |
| test 1 | 225 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 2 | 155 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 3 | 185 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Day 0, challenge 4 | |||||
| control | 2.7 × 107 | 3.2 × 107 | 5.0 × 107 | 1.8 × 108 | blocked |
| test 1 | 160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 2 | 115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| test 3 | 105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A value of 0 corresponds to a value that was below the lower limit of detection.
There was no growth from the antimicrobial catheters at 24 h after the first challenge and though cultures were positive on monitoring on Day 1 after challenges 3 and 4, and Day 2 after challenge 2, they were negative by Day 3 and cultures remained negative thereafter in the antimicrobial catheters throughout the four weekly challenges and each post-challenge perfusion (7 days).
Figure 2.(a) Section showing the extent of reactive gliosis in the tract wall (GFAP) for a control catheter after 1 week. The surrounding tissue gliotic response, demonstrated in both the control and impregnated groups after 1 week, reflected surgical trauma at this site, which subsided after 4 weeks. (b) Stains for β-APP revealed traumatic axonal injury (deposits are indicated by arrows) within the walls of the tracts related to surgical trauma. This was present in all groups and varied in extent, but was independent of the contents of the catheter. (c) The gliotic response at 4 weeks (GFAP) was reduced in both the control and impregnated catheters. The traumatic axonal injury resulting from the catheter implant persisted at 4 weeks, but the extent of inflammation at 4 weeks was proportional to the degree of traumatic injury and there was no subjective evidence that the impregnated catheter induced either inflammation or gliosis in excess of that produced by the control catheter. (d) An example of a catheter (control) at 4 weeks (β-APP) showing an inflammatory infiltrate extending from the catheter tip to traverse the corpus callosum (arrow), demonstrating significant axonal pathology in the corpus callosum, which presumably resulted in traumatic vascular injury (not shown). These cases showed tract inflammation at 4 weeks regardless of the contents of the catheter segment tip.