| Literature DB >> 31302512 |
Christina Peterson1, Gary Skolits2.
Abstract
Several evaluation models exist for investigating unintended outcomes, including goal-free and systems evaluation. Yet methods for collecting and analyzing data on unintended outcomes remain under-utilized. Ripple Effects Mapping (REM) is a promising qualitative evaluation method with a wide range of program planning and evaluation applications. In situations where program results are likely to occur over time within complex settings, this method is useful for uncovering both intended and unintended outcomes. REM applies an Appreciative Inquiry facilitation technique to engage stakeholders in visually mapping sequences of program outcomes. Although it has been used to evaluate community development and health promotion initiatives, further methodological guidance for applying REM is still needed. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the methodological development of evaluating unintended outcomes and extend the foundations of REM by describing steps for integrating it with grounded theory.Keywords: Goal-free evaluation; Grounded theory; Qualitative methods; Ripple Effects Mapping; Theory of change; Unintended outcomes
Year: 2019 PMID: 31302512 DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101677
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eval Program Plann ISSN: 0149-7189