Sheryl G Jordan1, Jessica B Robbins2, David Sarkany3, Eric England4, Vivek Kalia5, Maitray D Patel6, Kamran Ali7, Carolynn M DeBenedectis8, Christopher P Ho9, James M Milburn10, Seng Ong11, Ann K Jay12, Glenn C Gaviola13, Darel E Heitkamp14. 1. Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: sheryl_jordan@med.unc.edu. 2. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin. 3. Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health, Staten Island, New York. 4. University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 5. University of Michigan Health System Ann Arbor, Michigan. 6. Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona. 7. University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, Kansas. 8. University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts. 9. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 10. Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana. 11. University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 12. MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC. 13. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 14. AdventHealth Imaging, Orlando, Florida.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Well-Being subcommittee of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR) Common Program Requirements (CPR) Ad Hoc Committee and the APDR Academic Output Task Force jointly conducted a study of APDR members' current level of understanding and implementation of the 2017 ACGME CPR regarding well-being. METHODS: A survey instrument consisting of 10 multiple-choice and open-ended questions was distributed to the 322 active members of the APDR. The survey focused on three main content areas: APDR member knowledge of the 2017 CPR, composition of department well-being curricula, and residency well-being innovations. RESULTS: In all, 121 members (37.6%) responded to the survey. Of those, 67% rated their knowledge of requirements as incomplete. Responses also indicated that 74% of departments have not implemented a comprehensive well-being curriculum; 53% of programs do not offer the mandated self-screening tool; 15% of respondents do not offer residents protected time for medical, mental health, and dental appointments; and 42% do not offer their trainees access to an institutional mental health clinic. Survey comments offer numerous individual well-being initiatives from across the membership. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the APDR Well-Being Survey indicate that many programs have substantial work remaining to achieve ACGME compliance. Well-being innovations were included in an effort to share best practices.
PURPOSE: The Well-Being subcommittee of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR) Common Program Requirements (CPR) Ad Hoc Committee and the APDR Academic Output Task Force jointly conducted a study of APDR members' current level of understanding and implementation of the 2017 ACGME CPR regarding well-being. METHODS: A survey instrument consisting of 10 multiple-choice and open-ended questions was distributed to the 322 active members of the APDR. The survey focused on three main content areas: APDR member knowledge of the 2017 CPR, composition of department well-being curricula, and residency well-being innovations. RESULTS: In all, 121 members (37.6%) responded to the survey. Of those, 67% rated their knowledge of requirements as incomplete. Responses also indicated that 74% of departments have not implemented a comprehensive well-being curriculum; 53% of programs do not offer the mandated self-screening tool; 15% of respondents do not offer residents protected time for medical, mental health, and dental appointments; and 42% do not offer their trainees access to an institutional mental health clinic. Survey comments offer numerous individual well-being initiatives from across the membership. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the APDR Well-Being Survey indicate that many programs have substantial work remaining to achieve ACGME compliance. Well-being innovations were included in an effort to share best practices.
Authors: Elana B Smith; Alexis Boscak; Eric M Friedman; Shterna Frand; Lori A Deitte; Thad Benefield; Sheryl Jordan Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Lauren A Gaston-Hawkins; Francisco A Solorio; Grace F Chao; Carmen Renee' Green Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2020-11-28 Impact factor: 5.285