Literature DB >> 31301874

Implementation of an adult code sepsis protocol and its impact on SEP-1 core measure perfect score attainment in the ED.

Philip L Whitfield1, Patrick D Ratliff2, Lisa L Lockhart3, Dan Andrews3, Kelsey L Komyathy1, Mark A Sloan3, Jeremy C Leslie3, William R Judd1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Timely management of sepsis has become an urgent concern among most hospitals. Institutions have been searching for unique ways to increase the quality of care and timely adherence to proven therapies. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of an Adult Code Sepsis Protocol on the rate of SEP-1 perfect score attainment (PSA) among patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with severe sepsis or septic shock, as defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study in a 35-bed tertiary care hospital ED from December 2016 to February 2018. Adults (≥18 years of age) who met the CMS-case definition of severe sepsis or septic shock presenting to the ED either prior to or after implementation of an Adult Code Sepsis Protocol were included.
RESULTS: The primary outcome of SEP-1 PSA, which was abstracted in an all-or-none fashion, increased from 30.7% to 71.3% (p < 0.001). Inpatient mortality was reduced from 4% to 0% (p = 0.011) after protocol implementation. Protocol initiation also resulted in a significant reduction in both time to initiation of appropriate, empiric and effective antimicrobial therapy, based on culture results by 48 and 111 min, respectively (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes including ICU length-of-stay, readmission, or economic outcome measures.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of an Adult Code Sepsis Protocol in the ED significantly increased the rate of SEP-1 PSA, reduced inpatient mortality, and improved the time to initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compliance; Mortality; SEP-1; Sepsis; Septic shock; Severe sepsis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31301874     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  5 in total

Review 1.  Driving blind: instituting SEP-1 without high quality outcomes data.

Authors:  Jeffrey Wang; Jeffrey R Strich; Willard N Applefeld; Junfeng Sun; Xizhong Cui; Charles Natanson; Peter Q Eichacker
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Optimizing Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics of Antimicrobial Management in Patients with Sepsis: A Review.

Authors:  Kady Phe; Emily L Heil; Vincent H Tam
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Considerations for Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock in an Era of Antimicrobial Resistance.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Strich; Emily L Heil; Henry Masur
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Early fluid bolus in adults with sepsis in the emergency department: a systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Gladis Kabil; Steven A Frost; Deborah Hatcher; Amith Shetty; Jann Foster; Stephen McNally
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-01-11

5.  Relationship between time of emergency department admission and adherence to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Je Sung You; Yoo Seok Park; Sung Phil Chung; Hye Sun Lee; Soyoung Jeon; Won Young Kim; Tae Gun Shin; You Hwan Jo; Gu Hyun Kang; Sung Hyuk Choi; Gil Joon Suh; Byuk Sung Ko; Kap Su Han; Jong Hwan Shin; Taeyoung Kong
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.