Zahra Asgari1, Fateme Salehi2, Reyhaneh Hoseini1, Mahboubeh Abedi3, Ali Montazeri3. 1. Departments of Minimally Invasive Gynaecologic Surgery (Drs Asgari, Salehi, and Hoseini) and Sonography and Radiology (Dr Abedi), Arash Women's Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Departments of Minimally Invasive Gynaecologic Surgery (Drs Asgari, Salehi, and Hoseini) and Sonography and Radiology (Dr Abedi), Arash Women's Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: dr.f.salehii@gmail.com. 3. Health Metrics Research Centre, Institute for Health Sciences Research, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research, Tehran, Iran (Dr Montazeri).
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate uterine scar features after laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) compared with myomectomy performed by laparoscopy initially and then completed with minilaparotomy (LAM). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: An academic center for advanced endoscopic gynecologic surgery. PATIENTS: Sixty-nine symptomatic women who underwent myomectomy between July and December 2018. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent LM or LAM and 3-month follow-up ultrasonography. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty-four patients underwent LM and 25 underwent LAM. Demographic data, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Two-dimensional color Doppler ultrasound was done at a 3-month follow-up to evaluate myomectomy scar features, myometrial thickness, and the presence of and vascularity of a heterogeneous mass. These features were compared with those of the intact myometrium on the opposite wall of the patient's uterus. The 2 groups had similar demographic characteristics, and there were no significant between-group differences in the number, maximum diameter, type, or location of myomas. The mean myometrial thickness at the scar site was 18.9 ± 3.22 mm in the LM group and 19.7 ± 3.50 mm in the LAM group, with no significant difference between the 2 groups. There was no meaningful difference in vascularity between the scar and normal myometrium. Heterogeneous masses were detected in 23% of patients in the LM group and in 24% of those in the LAM group. Other than mean operative time (207 minutes for LM vs 150 minutes for LAM; p < .001) and mean postoperative reduction in hemoglobin (1.77 mg/dL for LM vs 2.35 mg/dL for LAM; p = .023), there were no other statistical differences between the 2 groups. One patient in the LM group experienced a bowel injury resulting from morcellation. CONCLUSION: There were no differences in myometrial scar features after LM compared with after LAM, implying effective suturing via both approaches.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate uterine scar features after laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) compared with myomectomy performed by laparoscopy initially and then completed with minilaparotomy (LAM). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: An academic center for advanced endoscopic gynecologic surgery. PATIENTS: Sixty-nine symptomatic women who underwent myomectomy between July and December 2018. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent LM or LAM and 3-month follow-up ultrasonography. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty-four patients underwent LM and 25 underwent LAM. Demographic data, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Two-dimensional color Doppler ultrasound was done at a 3-month follow-up to evaluate myomectomy scar features, myometrial thickness, and the presence of and vascularity of a heterogeneous mass. These features were compared with those of the intact myometrium on the opposite wall of the patient's uterus. The 2 groups had similar demographic characteristics, and there were no significant between-group differences in the number, maximum diameter, type, or location of myomas. The mean myometrial thickness at the scar site was 18.9 ± 3.22 mm in the LM group and 19.7 ± 3.50 mm in the LAM group, with no significant difference between the 2 groups. There was no meaningful difference in vascularity between the scar and normal myometrium. Heterogeneous masses were detected in 23% of patients in the LM group and in 24% of those in the LAM group. Other than mean operative time (207 minutes for LM vs 150 minutes for LAM; p < .001) and mean postoperative reduction in hemoglobin (1.77 mg/dL for LM vs 2.35 mg/dL for LAM; p = .023), there were no other statistical differences between the 2 groups. One patient in the LM group experienced a bowel injury resulting from morcellation. CONCLUSION: There were no differences in myometrial scar features after LM compared with after LAM, implying effective suturing via both approaches.