Literature DB >> 31301201

Automated deep learning method for whole-breast segmentation in diffusion-weighted breast MRI.

Lei Zhang1, Aly A Mohamed1, Ruimei Chai1,2, Yuan Guo1,3, Bingjie Zheng1,4, Shandong Wu5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MRI plays an increasingly important role in diagnostic applications and developing imaging biomarkers. Automated whole-breast segmentation is an important yet challenging step for quantitative breast imaging analysis. While methods have been developed on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, automatic whole-breast segmentation in breast DWI MRI is still underdeveloped.
PURPOSE: To develop a deep/transfer learning-based segmentation approach for DWI MRI scans and conduct an extensive study assessment on four imaging datasets from both internal and external sources. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
SUBJECTS: In all, 98 patients (144 MRI scans; 11,035 slices) of four different breast MRI datasets from two different institutions. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: 1.5T scanners with DCE sequence (Dataset 1 and Dataset 2) and DWI sequence. A 3.0T scanner with one external DWI sequence. ASSESSMENT: Deep learning models (UNet and SegNet) and transfer learning were used as segmentation approaches. The main DCE Dataset (4,251 2D slices from 39 patients) was used for pre-training and internal validation, and an unseen DCE Dataset (431 2D slices from 20 patients) was used as an independent test dataset for evaluating the pre-trained DCE models. The main DWI Dataset (6,343 2D slices from 75 MRI scans of 29 patients) was used for transfer learning and internal validation, and an unseen DWI Dataset (10 2D slices from 10 patients) was used for independent evaluation to the fine-tuned models for DWI segmentation. Manual segmentations by three radiologists (>10-year experience) were used to establish the ground truth for assessment. The segmentation performance was measured using the Dice Coefficient (DC) for the agreement between manual expert radiologist's segmentation and algorithm-generated segmentation. STATISTICAL TESTS: The mean value and standard deviation of the DCs were calculated to compare segmentation results from different deep learning models.
RESULTS: For the segmentation on the DCE MRI, the average DC of the UNet was 0.92 (cross-validation on the main DCE dataset) and 0.87 (external evaluation on the unseen DCE dataset), both higher than the performance of the SegNet. When segmenting the DWI images by the fine-tuned models, the average DC of the UNet was 0.85 (cross-validation on the main DWI dataset) and 0.72 (external evaluation on the unseen DWI dataset), both outperforming the SegNet on the same datasets. DATA
CONCLUSION: The internal and independent tests show that the deep/transfer learning models can achieve promising segmentation effects validated on DWI data from different institutions and scanner types. Our proposed approach may provide an automated toolkit to help computer-aided quantitative analyses of breast DWI images. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:635-643.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast MRI; breast segmentation; deep learning; diffusion-weighted imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31301201     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  8 in total

1.  Automated segmentation of articular disc of the temporomandibular joint on magnetic resonance images using deep learning.

Authors:  Shota Ito; Yuichi Mine; Yuki Yoshimi; Saori Takeda; Akari Tanaka; Azusa Onishi; Tzu-Yu Peng; Takashi Nakamoto; Toshikazu Nagasaki; Naoya Kakimoto; Takeshi Murayama; Kotaro Tanimoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  A U-Net Approach to Apical Lesion Segmentation on Panoramic Radiographs.

Authors:  Ibrahim S Bayrakdar; Kaan Orhan; Özer Çelik; Elif Bilgir; Hande Sağlam; Fatma Akkoca Kaplan; Sinem Atay Görür; Alper Odabaş; Ahmet Faruk Aslan; Ingrid Różyło-Kalinowska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  A Comprehensive Survey on Deep-Learning-Based Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Muhammad Firoz Mridha; Md Abdul Hamid; Muhammad Mostafa Monowar; Ashfia Jannat Keya; Abu Quwsar Ohi; Md Rashedul Islam; Jong-Myon Kim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Deep Learning Technology in Pathological Image Analysis of Breast Tissue.

Authors:  Yanan Liu; Xiaoyan Wang; Jingyu Li; Liguo Hao; Tianyu Zhao; He Zou; Dongbin Xu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 5.  Deep learning in breast imaging.

Authors:  Arka Bhowmik; Sarah Eskreis-Winkler
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2022-05-13

6.  Accurate segmentation of neonatal brain MRI with deep learning.

Authors:  Leonie Richter; Ahmed E Fetit
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 7.  Current Status and Future Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in Magnetic Resonance Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Anke Meyer-Bäse; Lia Morra; Uwe Meyer-Bäse; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Whole Volume Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Histogram as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker to Differentiate Breast Lesions: Correlation with the Ki-67 Proliferation Index.

Authors:  Yuan Guo; Qing-Cong Kong; Li-Qi Li; Wen-Jie Tang; Wan-Li Zhang; Guan-Yuan Ning; Jun Xue; Qian-Wei Zhou; Ying-Ying Liang; Mei Wu; Xin-Qing Jiang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.