| Literature DB >> 31301154 |
Stephen M Mount1, Žiga Avsec2, Liran Carmel3, Rita Casadio4, Muhammed Hasan Çelik2, Ken Chen5, Jun Cheng2, Noa E Cohen3,6, William G Fairbrother7, Tzila Fenesh8, Julien Gagneur2, Valer Gotea9, Tamar Holzer8, Chiao-Feng Lin10, Pier Luigi Martelli4, Tatsuhiko Naito11, Thi Yen Duong Nguyen2, Castrense Savojardo4, Ron Unger8, Robert Wang12,13, Yuedong Yang5, Huiying Zhao14.
Abstract
Precision medicine and sequence-based clinical diagnostics seek to predict disease risk or to identify causative variants from sequencing data. The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) is a community experiment consisting of genotype-phenotype prediction challenges; participants build models, undergo assessment, and share key findings. In the past, few CAGI challenges have addressed the impact of sequence variants on splicing. In CAGI5, two challenges (Vex-seq and MaPSY) involved prediction of the effect of variants, primarily single-nucleotide changes, on splicing. Although there are significant differences between these two challenges, both involved prediction of results from high-throughput exon inclusion assays. Here, we discuss the methods used to predict the impact of these variants on splicing, their performance, strengths, and weaknesses, and prospects for predicting the impact of sequence variation on splicing and disease phenotypes.Entities:
Keywords: CAGI experiment; machine learning; mutation; splicing; variant interpretation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31301154 PMCID: PMC6744318 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23869
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Mutat ISSN: 1059-7794 Impact factor: 4.878