Literature DB >> 31300291

Uptake and spread of infectious laryngotracheitis vaccine virus within meat chicken flocks following drinking water vaccination.

Peter J Groves1, Sarah L Williamson2, Sue M Sharpe3, Priscilla F Gerber4, Yuanshuo K Gao5, Tabitha J Hirn6, Stephen W Walkden-Brown7.   

Abstract

Vaccination against infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) in commercial broiler flocks in the field, which is only undertaken in the face of a local outbreak, requires mass administration techniques, usually via drinking water. This is often fraught with difficulties such as variable vaccination "reactions" and sometimes, vaccination failure. Laboratory testing of the outbreak strains however invariably shows the vaccines in use to be protective. To investigate this paradox, the dynamics of an ILT vaccine virus was examined within broiler flocks during a natural outbreak. In an initial flock, 70 birds were individually identified and had tracheal swabs collected sequentially at intervals from 1 to 26 days after vaccination and submitted for ILTV detection using qPCR. This evaluation was extended by collection of tracheal swabs from 40 to 45 random birds at 4, 7-8, 12-13 and 25-26 days post vaccination (pv) across a further 7 flocks. The results showed a very variable early uptake of vaccine virus from the drinking water (between 3% and 52% of tested birds with detectable virus in trachea at 4 days pv) and revealed that actual vaccination of the flocks relied on bird to bird transmission of the vaccine virus. In flocks with very low (<10%) initial bird uptake, successful exposure of vaccine virus to the majority of the flock can be delayed, leaving a large proportion of birds as susceptible at the likely time of possible exposure to wild virus. This may explain the cases of apparent failure of vaccination in the field. The variable bird to bird spread can be associated with reversion to virulence, this may explain the rolling vaccine reactions often observed. The variation in initial vaccine uptake may be affected by some factors involved with the administration technique and this requires further study in a larger sample size.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infectious laryngotracheitis; Vaccination

Year:  2019        PMID: 31300291     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  3 in total

1.  Transmission of infectious laryngotracheitis virus vaccine and field strains: the role of degree of contact and transmission by whole blood, plasma and poultry dust.

Authors:  Addisu A Yegoraw; Awol M Assen; Priscilla F Gerber; Stephen W Walkden-Brown
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.683

2.  Analysis of Whole-Genome Sequences of Infectious laryngotracheitis Virus Isolates from Poultry Flocks in Canada: Evidence of Recombination.

Authors:  Ana Perez Contreras; Frank van der Meer; Sylvia Checkley; Tomy Joseph; Robin King; Madhu Ravi; Delores Peters; Kevin Fonseca; Carl A Gagnon; Chantale Provost; Davor Ojkic; Mohamed Faizal Abdul-Careem
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 5.048

3.  Genetic Heterogeneity among Chicken Infectious Anemia Viruses Detected in Italian Fowl.

Authors:  Giulia Quaglia; Giulia Mescolini; Elena Catelli; Giacomo Berto; Filippo Muccioli; Caterina Lupini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.