Phillip A Romanski1, Kaitlyn E James2, Mary E Sabatini3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA. Electronic address: promanski@partners.org. 2. Deborah Kelly Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA.
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the perspectives of women's health providers on the use of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for common medical disorders? DESIGN: A cross-sectional 15-question online anonymous survey was conducted of women's health providers specializing in general obstetrics/gynaecology, gynaecologic oncology and infertility at a tertiary care academic institution in Massachusetts, USA. Respondents could answer 'yes', 'no' or 'unsure' to each thematic question. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 1060 providers and 240 providers responded (response rate 22.6%). Overall, 93% of respondents supported the use of PGT for the identification of genetic mutations which lead to childhood-onset disease, 83% supported the use of PGT for chromosomal aneuploidy screening, and 76% supported the use of PGT for cancer-related genetic disorders. Only 1.7% of respondents supported the use of PGT for non-disease-related indications, including sex selection and physical traits. Compared with general obstetrics/gynaecology providers, infertility specialists were more supportive of PGT. In total, 22.5% of respondents reported no prior knowledge of PGT. CONCLUSIONS: In a sample of women's health providers across multiple different obstetrics/gynaecology specialties, there was overall support for the use of PGT for a variety of common indications. Infertility specialists were the most supportive, which may reflect the familiarity that these providers have with this procedure. There was an overwhelmingly non-supportive response for the use of PGT for non-disease-related indications. The percentage of medical professionals working in women's health without prior knowledge of PGT (22.5%) was higher than expected, identifying the need for more education regarding the availability and potential indications for this procedure.
RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the perspectives of women's health providers on the use of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for common medical disorders? DESIGN: A cross-sectional 15-question online anonymous survey was conducted of women's health providers specializing in general obstetrics/gynaecology, gynaecologic oncology and infertility at a tertiary care academic institution in Massachusetts, USA. Respondents could answer 'yes', 'no' or 'unsure' to each thematic question. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 1060 providers and 240 providers responded (response rate 22.6%). Overall, 93% of respondents supported the use of PGT for the identification of genetic mutations which lead to childhood-onset disease, 83% supported the use of PGT for chromosomal aneuploidy screening, and 76% supported the use of PGT for cancer-related genetic disorders. Only 1.7% of respondents supported the use of PGT for non-disease-related indications, including sex selection and physical traits. Compared with general obstetrics/gynaecology providers, infertility specialists were more supportive of PGT. In total, 22.5% of respondents reported no prior knowledge of PGT. CONCLUSIONS: In a sample of women's health providers across multiple different obstetrics/gynaecology specialties, there was overall support for the use of PGT for a variety of common indications. Infertility specialists were the most supportive, which may reflect the familiarity that these providers have with this procedure. There was an overwhelmingly non-supportive response for the use of PGT for non-disease-related indications. The percentage of medical professionals working in women's health without prior knowledge of PGT (22.5%) was higher than expected, identifying the need for more education regarding the availability and potential indications for this procedure.