Literature DB >> 31299750

Comparing Outcomes in Orthognathic Surgery Using Clear Aligners Versus Conventional Fixed Appliances.

Hadyn Kankam1, Sarika Madari1, Rajendra Sawh-Martinez1, Karl C Bruckman1, Derek M Steinbacher1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Orthognathic surgery for dentofacial deformities is typically preceded and followed by orthodontic treatment. Traditionally, orthodontic hardware is secured to the dentition to allow dental movement and stabilization. Clear-aligner therapy (eg, Invisalign) provides an aesthetic alternative, consisting of a series of transparent trays. Its use has not been described in complex triple-jaw orthognathic surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate perioperative outcomes and 3-dimensionally quantify postoperative edema in Invisalign patients undergoing triple-jaw orthognathic procedures, comparing this to patients treated with conventional fixed appliances. The surgical approach to patients with clear-aligners is also outlined.
METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective chart review and 3-dimensional morphometric study of Invisalign patients undergoing triple-jaw surgery (LeFort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, and genioplasty). An identical assessment of demographically matched patients treated with conventional fixed appliances was performed and compared with the Invisalign group.
RESULTS: Thirty-three patients, with a mean age of 19.99 years, were included: 13 with Invisalign and 20 with conventional fixed appliances. No significant difference was observed in operating time, concurrent extraction of teeth, fat grafting, duration of hospital stay, diet advancement, and use of narcotic analgesics between the 2 groups. Nine patients had sufficient 3-dimensional images for volumetric analysis (4 with Invisalign and 5 with conventional fixed appliances). Postoperative edema was not significantly different (P = 0.712) when comparing conventional fixed appliances (44.29 ± 23.16 cm) to Invisalign (37.36 ± 31.19 cm).
CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that complex multiple-jaw orthognathic procedures can be successfully performed in Invisalign patients. Perioperative and short-term clinical outcomes are not compromised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31299750     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  3 in total

1.  Differences in finished case quality between Invisalign and traditional fixed appliances.

Authors:  Eric Lin; Katie Julien; Matthew Kesterke; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Presurgical orthodontic decompensation with clear aligners.

Authors:  Amalia Cong; Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Sandra Khong Tai; Charlene Tai Loh; Mary Barkley; Marilia Yatabe; Marco Caminiti; Camila Massaro; Jonas Bianchi; Romain Deleat-Besson; Celia Le; Juan Carlos Prieto; Najla N Al Turkestani; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 3.  Clear Aligners: Between Evolution and Efficiency-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Alessandra Putrino; Ersilia Barbato; Gabriella Galluccio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.