Micah Belzberg1, Netanel Ben Shalom2, Edward Yuhanna3, Amir Manbachi3,4, Aylin Tekes5, Judy Huang2, Henry Brem2, Chad R Gordon1,2. 1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 3. Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 5. Division of Pediatric Radiology and Pediatric Neuroradiology, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previously, sonographic evaluation of the intracranial contents was limited to intraoperative use following bone flap removal, with placement of the probe directly on the cortical surface or through a transsulcal tubular retractor. Cranioplasty with sonolucent implants may represent a postoperative window into the brain by allowing ultrasound to serve as a novel bedside imaging modality. The potential sonolucency of various commonly used cranial implant types was examined in this study. METHODS: A 3-phase study was comprised of cadaveric evaluation of transcranioplasty ultrasound (TCU) with cranioplasty implants of varying materials, intraoperative TCU during right-sided cranioplasty with clear implant made of poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA), and bedside TCU on postoperative day 5 after cranioplasty. RESULTS: The TCU through clear PMMA, polyether-ether-ketone, and opaque PMMA cranial implants revealed implant sonoluceny, in contrast to autologous bone and porous-polyethylene. Intraoperative ultrasound via the clear PMMA implant in a single patient revealed recognizable ventricular anatomy. Furthermore, postoperative bedside ultrasound in the same patient revealed comparable ventricular anatomy and a small epidural fluid collection corresponding to that visualized on an axial computed tomography scan. CONCLUSION: Sonolucent cranial implants, such as those made of clear PMMA, hold great promise for enhanced diagnostic and therapeutic applications previously limited by cranial bone. Furthermore, as functional cranial implants are manufactured with implantable devices housed within clear PMMA, the possibility of utilizing ultrasound for real-time surveillance of intracranial pathology becomes much more feasible.
BACKGROUND: Previously, sonographic evaluation of the intracranial contents was limited to intraoperative use following bone flap removal, with placement of the probe directly on the cortical surface or through a transsulcal tubular retractor. Cranioplasty with sonolucent implants may represent a postoperative window into the brain by allowing ultrasound to serve as a novel bedside imaging modality. The potential sonolucency of various commonly used cranial implant types was examined in this study. METHODS: A 3-phase study was comprised of cadaveric evaluation of transcranioplasty ultrasound (TCU) with cranioplasty implants of varying materials, intraoperative TCU during right-sided cranioplasty with clear implant made of poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA), and bedside TCU on postoperative day 5 after cranioplasty. RESULTS: The TCU through clear PMMA, polyether-ether-ketone, and opaque PMMA cranial implants revealed implant sonoluceny, in contrast to autologous bone and porous-polyethylene. Intraoperative ultrasound via the clear PMMA implant in a single patient revealed recognizable ventricular anatomy. Furthermore, postoperative bedside ultrasound in the same patient revealed comparable ventricular anatomy and a small epidural fluid collection corresponding to that visualized on an axial computed tomography scan. CONCLUSION: Sonolucent cranial implants, such as those made of clear PMMA, hold great promise for enhanced diagnostic and therapeutic applications previously limited by cranial bone. Furthermore, as functional cranial implants are manufactured with implantable devices housed within clear PMMA, the possibility of utilizing ultrasound for real-time surveillance of intracranial pathology becomes much more feasible.
Authors: Massimiliano Del Bene; Luca Raspagliesi; Giovanni Carone; Paola Gaviani; Antonio Silvani; Luigi Solbiati; Francesco Prada; Francesco DiMeco Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Alex R Flores; Visish M Srinivasan; Jill Seeley; Charity Huggins; Peter Kan; Jan-Karl Burkhardt Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Kerry-Ann S Mitchell; William Anderson; Tamir Shay; Judy Huang; Mark Luciano; Jose I Suarez; Paul Manson; Henry Brem; Chad R Gordon Journal: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Laura Librizzi; Laura Uva; Luca Raspagliesi; Matteo Gionso; Maria Cristina Regondi; Giovanni Durando; Francesco DiMeco; Marco de Curtis; Francesco Prada Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 4.379