Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety between diode laser (980 nm) enucleation of the prostate (DiLEP) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Patients and Methods: One hundred twenty-six BPH patients in our hospital from December 2016 to December 2017 were enrolled in this study. They were randomized to the DiLEP group or HoLEP group, which were administrated with DiLEP and HoLEP treatment, respectively. The patient's characteristics, such as age, body mass index, comorbidities, prostate volume, and prostate-specific antigen, were recorded before surgery. The perioperative outcomes and complications were also compared. The maximum flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), and quality-of-life (QoL) score were assessed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results: No significant differences were observed for the patient's baseline characteristics between both groups. For the perioperative outcomes, including operative time, resected tissue weight, catheter duration, and hospital stay, no significant difference was found between the two groups. However, the DiLEP group showed less blood loss and decrease in hemoglobin compared with the HoLEP group. The incidence of early or late complications was similar for both groups. The Qmax, PVR, IPSS, and QoL for both groups of patients were dramatically improved after surgery. By comparing the Qmax, PVR, IPSS, and QoL between the two groups, no significant differences were detected in the 3-, 6-, or 12-month follow-up. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that both DiLEP and HoLEP are efficient and safe treatments for BPH patients. DiLEP showed less blood loss and decrease in hemoglobin than HoLEP, which indicated that the diode laser (980 nm) generates a better hemostasis effect.
RCT Entities:
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety between diode laser (980 nm) enucleation of the prostate (DiLEP) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Patients and Methods: One hundred twenty-six BPH patients in our hospital from December 2016 to December 2017 were enrolled in this study. They were randomized to the DiLEP group or HoLEP group, which were administrated with DiLEP and HoLEP treatment, respectively. The patient's characteristics, such as age, body mass index, comorbidities, prostate volume, and prostate-specific antigen, were recorded before surgery. The perioperative outcomes and complications were also compared. The maximum flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), and quality-of-life (QoL) score were assessed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results: No significant differences were observed for the patient's baseline characteristics between both groups. For the perioperative outcomes, including operative time, resected tissue weight, catheter duration, and hospital stay, no significant difference was found between the two groups. However, the DiLEP group showed less blood loss and decrease in hemoglobin compared with the HoLEP group. The incidence of early or late complications was similar for both groups. The Qmax, PVR, IPSS, and QoL for both groups of patients were dramatically improved after surgery. By comparing the Qmax, PVR, IPSS, and QoL between the two groups, no significant differences were detected in the 3-, 6-, or 12-month follow-up. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that both DiLEP and HoLEP are efficient and safe treatments for BPH patients. DiLEP showed less blood loss and decrease in hemoglobin than HoLEP, which indicated that the diode laser (980 nm) generates a better hemostasis effect.
Authors: Thomas R W Herrmann; Stavros Gravas; Jean Jmch de la Rosette; Mathias Wolters; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Ioannis Giannakis Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-05-10 Impact factor: 4.241