Literature DB >> 31298269

Powerful three-sample genome-wide design and robust statistical inference in summary-data Mendelian randomization.

Qingyuan Zhao1, Yang Chen2, Jingshu Wang1, Dylan S Small1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Summary-data Mendelian randomization (MR) has become a popular research design to estimate the causal effect of risk exposures. With the sample size of GWAS continuing to increase, it is now possible to use genetic instruments that are only weakly associated with the exposure. DEVELOPMENT: We propose a three-sample genome-wide design where typically 1000 independent genetic instruments across the whole genome are used. We develop an empirical partially Bayes statistical analysis approach where instruments are weighted according to their strength; thus weak instruments bring less variation to the estimator. The estimator is highly efficient with many weak genetic instruments and is robust to balanced and/or sparse pleiotropy. APPLICATION: We apply our method to estimate the causal effect of body mass index (BMI) and major blood lipids on cardiovascular disease outcomes, and obtain substantially shorter confidence intervals (CIs). In particular, the estimated causal odds ratio of BMI on ischaemic stroke is 1.19 (95% CI: 1.07-1.32, P-value <0.001); the estimated causal odds ratio of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) on coronary artery disease (CAD) is 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84, P-value <0.001). However, the estimated effect of HDL-C attenuates and become statistically non-significant when we only use strong instruments.
CONCLUSIONS: A genome-wide design can greatly improve the statistical power of MR studies. Robust statistical methods may alleviate but not solve the problem of horizontal pleiotropy. Our empirical results suggest that the relationship between HDL-C and CAD is heterogeneous, and it may be too soon to completely dismiss the HDL hypothesis.
© The Author(s) 2019; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conditional score; HDL hypothesis; partially Bayes; robust statistics; spike-and-slab prior

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31298269     DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  36 in total

1.  Genetic determinants of blood-cell traits influence susceptibility to childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Linda Kachuri; Soyoung Jeon; Andrew T DeWan; Catherine Metayer; Xiaomei Ma; John S Witte; Charleston W K Chiang; Joseph L Wiemels; Adam J de Smith
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 11.043

2.  Quantifying causality in data science with quasi-experiments.

Authors:  Tony Liu; Lyle Ungar; Konrad Kording
Journal:  Nat Comput Sci       Date:  2021-01-14

3.  Association of mTORC1‑dependent circulating protein levels with cataract formation: a mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Yingjun Cai; Kangcheng Liu; Pengfei Wu; Ruolan Yuan; Fei He; Jing Zou
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.547

4.  Constrained maximum likelihood-based Mendelian randomization robust to both correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects.

Authors:  Haoran Xue; Xiaotong Shen; Wei Pan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 11.043

5.  Causal Relationship and Shared Genetic Loci between Psoriasis and Type 2 Diabetes through Trans-Disease Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew T Patrick; Philip E Stuart; Haihan Zhang; Qingyuan Zhao; Xianyong Yin; Kevin He; Xu-Jie Zhou; Nehal N Mehta; John J Voorhees; Michael Boehnke; Johann E Gudjonsson; Rajan P Nair; Samuel K Handelman; James T Elder; Dajiang J Liu; Lam C Tsoi
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 7.590

6.  Inferring the direction of a causal link and estimating its effect via a Bayesian Mendelian randomization approach.

Authors:  Ioan Gabriel Bucur; Tom Claassen; Tom Heskes
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Pleiotropy robust methods for multivariable Mendelian randomization.

Authors:  Andrew J Grant; Stephen Burgess
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A comprehensive evaluation of methods for Mendelian randomization using realistic simulations and an analysis of 38 biomarkers for risk of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Guanghao Qi; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Using genetic variants to evaluate the causal effect of serum vitamin D concentration on COVID-19 susceptibility, severity and hospitalization traits: a Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Zhiyong Cui; Yun Tian
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations.

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; George Davey Smith; Neil M Davies; Frank Dudbridge; Dipender Gill; M Maria Glymour; Fernando P Hartwig; Michael V Holmes; Cosetta Minelli; Caroline L Relton; Evropi Theodoratou
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2020-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.