Literature DB >> 31297895

Future directions for high-throughput splicing assays in precision medicine.

Christy L Rhine1, Christopher Neil1, David T Glidden2, Kamil J Cygan1,2, Alger M Fredericks1, Jing Wang1, Nephi A Walton3, William G Fairbrother1,2,4.   

Abstract

Classification of variants of unknown significance is a challenging technical problem in clinical genetics. As up to one-third of disease-causing mutations are thought to affect pre-mRNA splicing, it is important to accurately classify splicing mutations in patient sequencing data. Several consortia and healthcare systems have conducted large-scale patient sequencing studies, which discover novel variants faster than they can be classified. Here, we compare the advantages and limitations of several high-throughput splicing assays aimed at mitigating this bottleneck, and describe a data set of ~5,000 variants that we analyzed using our Massively Parallel Splicing Assay (MaPSy). The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation group (CAGI) organized a challenge, in which participants submitted machine learning models to predict the splicing effects of variants in this data set. We discuss the winning submission of the challenge (MMSplice) which outperformed existing software. Finally, we highlight methods to overcome the limitations of MaPSy and similar assays, such as tissue-specific splicing, the effect of surrounding sequence context, classifying intronic variants, synthesizing large exons, and amplifying complex libraries of minigene species. Further development of these assays will greatly benefit the field of clinical genetics, which lack high-throughput methods for variant interpretation.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assay; disease; high-throughput; precision medicine; splicing; variant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31297895      PMCID: PMC6744296          DOI: 10.1002/humu.23866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  44 in total

1.  Predictive identification of exonic splicing enhancers in human genes.

Authors:  William G Fairbrother; Ru-Fang Yeh; Phillip A Sharp; Christopher B Burge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  RESCUE-ESE identifies candidate exonic splicing enhancers in vertebrate exons.

Authors:  William G Fairbrother; Gene W Yeo; Rufang Yeh; Paul Goldstein; Matthew Mawson; Phillip A Sharp; Christopher B Burge
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Bias in template-to-product ratios in multitemplate PCR.

Authors:  M F Polz; C M Cavanaugh
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Genomic HEXploring allows landscaping of novel potential splicing regulatory elements.

Authors:  Steffen Erkelenz; Stephan Theiss; Marianne Otte; Marek Widera; Jan Otto Peter; Heiner Schaal
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Small molecule amiloride modulates oncogenic RNA alternative splicing to devitalize human cancer cells.

Authors:  Jan-Gowth Chang; Den-Mei Yang; Wen-Hsin Chang; Lu-Ping Chow; Wen-Ling Chan; Hui-Hua Lin; Hsien-Da Huang; Ya-Sian Chang; Cheng-Hao Hung; Wen-Kuang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Geisinger MyCode community health initiative: an electronic health record-linked biobank for precision medicine research.

Authors:  David J Carey; Samantha N Fetterolf; F Daniel Davis; William A Faucett; H Lester Kirchner; Uyenlinh Mirshahi; Michael F Murray; Diane T Smelser; Glenn S Gerhard; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 7.  The Expanding Landscape of Alternative Splicing Variation in Human Populations.

Authors:  Eddie Park; Zhicheng Pan; Zijun Zhang; Lan Lin; Yi Xing
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Vex-seq: high-throughput identification of the impact of genetic variation on pre-mRNA splicing efficiency.

Authors:  Scott I Adamson; Lijun Zhan; Brenton R Graveley
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Genetic inactivation of ANGPTL4 improves glucose homeostasis and is associated with reduced risk of diabetes.

Authors:  Viktoria Gusarova; Colm O'Dushlaine; Tanya M Teslovich; Peter N Benotti; Tooraj Mirshahi; Omri Gottesman; Cristopher V Van Hout; Michael F Murray; Anubha Mahajan; Jonas B Nielsen; Lars Fritsche; Anders Berg Wulff; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Marketa Sjögren; Connor A Emdin; Robert A Scott; Wen-Jane Lee; Aeron Small; Lydia C Kwee; Om Prakash Dwivedi; Rashmi B Prasad; Shannon Bruse; Alexander E Lopez; John Penn; Anthony Marcketta; Joseph B Leader; Christopher D Still; H Lester Kirchner; Uyenlinh L Mirshahi; Amr H Wardeh; Cassandra M Hartle; Lukas Habegger; Samantha N Fetterolf; Teresa Tusie-Luna; Andrew P Morris; Hilma Holm; Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir; Patrick Sulem; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Jerome I Rotter; Lee-Ming Chuang; Scott Damrauer; David Birtwell; Chad M Brummett; Amit V Khera; Pradeep Natarajan; Marju Orho-Melander; Jason Flannick; Luca A Lotta; Cristen J Willer; Oddgeir L Holmen; Marylyn D Ritchie; David H Ledbetter; Andrew J Murphy; Ingrid B Borecki; Jeffrey G Reid; John D Overton; Ola Hansson; Leif Groop; Svati H Shah; William E Kraus; Daniel J Rader; Yii-Der I Chen; Kristian Hveem; Nicholas J Wareham; Sekar Kathiresan; Olle Melander; Kari Stefansson; Børge G Nordestgaard; Anne Tybjærg-Hansen; Goncalo R Abecasis; David Altshuler; Jose C Florez; Michael Boehnke; Mark I McCarthy; George D Yancopoulos; David J Carey; Alan R Shuldiner; Aris Baras; Frederick E Dewey; Jesper Gromada
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Trajectory of exonic variant discovery in a large clinical population: implications for variant curation.

Authors:  Uyenlinh L Mirshahi; Jonathan Z Luo; Kandamurugu Manickam; Amr H Wardeh; Tooraj Mirshahi; Michael F Murray; David J Carey
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  5 in total

1.  Modeling splicing outcome by combining 5'ss strength and splicing regulatory elements.

Authors:  Lisa Müller; Johannes Ptok; Azlan Nisar; Jennifer Antemann; Ramona Grothmann; Frank Hillebrand; Anna-Lena Brillen; Anastasia Ritchie; Stephan Theiss; Heiner Schaal
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 19.160

2.  Allele-specific alternative splicing and its functional genetic variants in human tissues.

Authors:  Kofi Amoah; Yun-Hua Esther Hsiao; Jae Hoon Bahn; Yiwei Sun; Christina Burghard; Boon Xin Tan; Ei-Wen Yang; Xinshu Xiao
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Functional assessment of somatic STK11 variants identified in primary human non-small cell lung cancers.

Authors:  Liam L Donnelly; Tyler C Hogan; Sean M Lenahan; Gopika Nandagopal; Jenna G Eaton; Meagan A Lebeau; Cai L McCann; Hailey M Sarausky; Kenneth J Hampel; Jordan D Armstrong; Margaret P Cameron; Nikoletta Sidiropoulos; Paula Deming; David J Seward
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Minigene-based splicing analysis and ACMG/AMP-based tentative classification of 56 ATM variants.

Authors:  Elena Bueno-Martínez; Lara Sanoguera-Miralles; Alberto Valenzuela-Palomo; Ada Esteban-Sánchez; Víctor Lorca; Inés Llinares-Burguet; Jamie Allen; Alicia García-Álvarez; Pedro Pérez-Segura; Mercedes Durán; Douglas F Easton; Peter Devilee; Maaike Pg Vreeswijk; Miguel de la Hoya; Eladio A Velasco-Sampedro
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 9.883

5.  Massively parallel reporter assays discover de novo exonic splicing mutants in paralogs of Autism genes.

Authors:  Christy L Rhine; Christopher Neil; Jing Wang; Samantha Maguire; Luke Buerer; Mitchell Salomon; Ijeoma C Meremikwu; Juliana Kim; Natasha T Strande; William G Fairbrother
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.917

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.