Literature DB >> 31297674

SentimagIC: A Non-inferiority Trial Comparing Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Versus Technetium-99m and Blue Dye in the Detection of Axillary Sentinel Nodes in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Michael D Alvarado1, Elizabeth A Mittendorf2, Mediget Teshome2, Alastair M Thompson2, Richard J Bold3, Mark A Gittleman4, Peter D Beitsch5, Sarah L Blair6, Kaisa Kivilaid7, Quentin J Harmer8, Kelly K Hunt2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a highly accurate method for staging the axilla in early breast cancer. Superparamagnetic iron oxide mapping agents have been explored to overcome the disadvantages of the standard SLNB technique, which uses a radioisotope tracer with or without blue dye. One such agent, Sienna+, was shown to be non-inferior to the standard technique for SLNB in a number of studies. The SentimagIC trial was designed to establish the non-inferiority of a new formulation of this magnetic tracer, Magtrace (formerly SiennaXP).
METHODS: Patients with clinically node-negative early-stage breast cancer were recruited from six centers in the US. Patients received radioisotope and isosulfan blue dye injections, followed by an intraoperative injection of magnetic tracer, prior to SLNB. The sentinel node identification rate was compared between the magnetic and standard techniques to evaluate non-inferiority and concordance.
RESULTS: Data were collected for 146 procedures in 146 patients. The per patient detection rate was 99.3% (145/146) when using the magnetic tracer and 98.6% (144/146) when using the standard technique, while the nodal detection rate was 94.3% (348/369 nodes) when using the magnetic tracer and 93.5% (345/369) when using the standard technique (difference 0.8%, 95% binomial confidence interval lower bound - 2.1%). Of the 22 patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), 21 (95.4%) were detected by both the magnetic tracer and the standard technique. All malignant nodes detected by standard technique were also identified by the magnetic technique.
CONCLUSION: The magnetic technique is non-inferior to the standard technique of radioisotope and blue dye for axillary SLN detection in early-stage breast cancer. The magnetic technique is therefore a viable alternative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31297674     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07577-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current and novel mapping substances in gynecologic cancer care.

Authors:  Lea A Moukarzel; Jacqueline Feinberg; Evan J Levy; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  MR lymphography with superparamagnetic iron oxide for sentinel lymph node mapping of N0 early oral cancer: A pilot study.

Authors:  Satomi Sugiyama; Toshinori Iwai; Junichi Baba; Senri Oguri; Toshiharu Izumi; Masaki Sekino; Moriaki Kusakabe; Kenji Mitsudo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 3.  Sentinel lymph node assessment in breast cancer-an update on current recommendations.

Authors:  Gábor Cserni; Aoife Maguire; Simonetta Bianchi; Ales Ryska; Anikó Kovács
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Establishing a prediction model of axillary nodal burden based on the combination of CT and ultrasound findings and the clinicopathological features in patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Xianfu Sun; Qiang Zhang; Lianjie Niu; Tao Huang; Yingjie Wang; Shengze Zhang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-02

5.  Optimizing Dose and Timing in Magnetic Tracer Techniques for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Early Breast Cancers: The Prospective Multicenter SentiDose Trial.

Authors:  Abdi-Fatah Hersi; Lida Pistiolis; Carlos Dussan Luberth; Eva Vikhe-Patil; Fredrik Nilsson; Imad Mohammed; Roger Olofsson Bagge; Fredrik Wärnberg; Staffan Eriksson; Andreas Karakatsanis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  A Comprehensive Grading System for a Magnetic Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Eliane R Nieuwenhuis; Barry Kolenaar; Jurrit J Hof; Joop van Baarlen; Alexander J M van Bemmel; Anke Christenhusz; Tom W J Scheenen; Bernard Ten Haken; Remco de Bree; Lejla Alic
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide versus Radioisotope Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Zuzanna Pelc; Magdalena Skórzewska; Maria Kurylcio; Tomasz Nowikiewicz; Radosław Mlak; Katarzyna Sędłak; Katarzyna Gęca; Karol Rawicz-Pruszyński; Wojciech Zegarski; Wojciech P Polkowski; Andrzej Kurylcio
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  Advanced diagnostic imaging of sentinel lymph node in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Ping Li; Desheng Sun
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 0.869

9.  Sentinel lymph node mapping with superparamagnetic iron oxide for melanoma: a pilot study in healthy participants to establish an optimal MRI workflow protocol.

Authors:  Loeki Aldenhoven; Caroline Frotscher; Rachelle Körver-Steeman; Milou H Martens; Damir Kuburic; Alfred Janssen; Geerard L Beets; James van Bastelaar
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 10.  Meta-analysis Comparing Fluorescence Imaging with Radioisotope and Blue Dye-Guided Sentinel Node Identification for Breast Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Martha S Kedrzycki; Maria Leiloglou; Hutan Ashrafian; Natasha Jiwa; Paul T R Thiruchelvam; Daniel S Elson; Daniel R Leff
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 5.344

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.