Literature DB >> 31297215

Effects of noise on mental performance and annoyance considering task difficulty level and tone components of noise.

Mohammad Javad Jafari1,2, Marzieh Sadeghian1,2, Ali Khavanin3, Soheila Khodakarim4, Amir Salar Jafarpisheh5.   

Abstract

Rotating components in mechanical systems produce tonal noises and the presence of these tones effect the quality and comfort of occupants leading to annoyance and a decrease in mental performance. The ISO 1996-2 and ANSI S1.13 standards have described metrics to quantify the effects of prominent tones, but more research on how noise attributes effect annoyance and performance, especially in different levels of task difficulty are necessary. This paper investigates relations between noise metrics, annoyance responses and mental performance under different task difficulty levels while exposed to background noise with tonal components. In this study, sixty participants were evaluated on subjective perceived annoyance and varying workloads while exposed to 18 noise signals with three different prominence tones at three frequency tones and two background noise levels while doing three different levels of n-back tasks in a controlled test chamber. Performance parameters were measured by recording the reaction time, the correct rate, and the number of misses. The results indicate an increasing trend for number of misses and reaction times at higher task difficulty levels, but a decrease for correct rate. The study results showed a significant difference for subjective responses except for annoyance and loudness under different levels of task difficulty. The participants were more annoyed with higher background noise levels, lower tone frequencies and increasing tone levels especially under increasing task difficulty. Loudness metrics highly correlate with other noise metrics. Three models for the prediction of perceived annoyance are presented based on the most strongly correlated noise metrics using neural network models. Each of the three models had different input parameters and different network structures. The accuracy and MSE of all three neural network models show it to be appropriate for predicting perceived annoyance. The results show the effect of tonal noise on annoyance and mental performance especially in different levels of task difficulty. The results also suggest that neural network models have high accuracy and efficiency, and can be used to predict noise annoyance. Model 1 is preferred in certain aspects, such as lower input parameters, making it more user-friendly. The best neural network model included both loudness metrics and tonality metrics. It seems that combined metrics have the least importance and are unnecessary in the proposed neural network model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mental performance; Neural network; Noise metrics; Task difficulty; Tonal noise annoyance

Year:  2019        PMID: 31297215      PMCID: PMC6582013          DOI: 10.1007/s40201-019-00353-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng


  11 in total

1.  The development of the noise sensitivity questionnaire.

Authors:  Martin Schütte; Anke Marks; Edna Wenning; Barbara Griefahn
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.867

2.  Implications of human performance and perception under tonal noise conditions on indoor noise criteria.

Authors:  Erica E Ryherd; Lily M Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Psychoacoustical evaluation of natural and urban sounds in soundscapes.

Authors:  Ming Yang; Jian Kang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Modeling subjective evaluation of soundscape quality in urban open spaces: An artificial neural network approach.

Authors:  Lei Yu; Jian Kang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceived magnitude of two-tone-noise complexes: loudness, annoyance, and noisiness.

Authors:  R P Hellman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Threat of bodily harm has opposing effects on cognition.

Authors:  Kesong Hu; Andrew Bauer; Srikanth Padmala; Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2011-06-27

7.  Growth rate of loudness, annoyance, and noisiness as a function of tone location within the noise spectrum.

Authors:  R P Hellman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Neural and psychophysiological correlates of human performance under stress and high mental workload.

Authors:  Kevin Mandrick; Vsevolod Peysakhovich; Florence Rémy; Evelyne Lepron; Mickaël Causse
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  Interaction of threat and verbal working memory in adolescents.

Authors:  Nilam Patel; Katherine Vytal; Nevia Pavletic; Catherine Stoodley; Daniel S Pine; Christian Grillon; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  The impact of anxiety upon cognition: perspectives from human threat of shock studies.

Authors:  Oliver J Robinson; Katherine Vytal; Brian R Cornwell; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Improving the performance of double-expansion chamber muffler using dielectric beads; optimization using factorial design.

Authors:  Niloofar Damyar; Fariba Mansouri; Ali Khavanin; Ahmad Jonidi Jafari; Hasan Asilian; Ramazan Mirzaei
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-11-02

Review 2.  Redox Implications of Extreme Task Performance: The Case in Driver Athletes.

Authors:  Michael B Reid
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 6.600

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.