Literature DB >> 31296472

Understanding stillbirth stigma: A scoping literature review.

Danielle Pollock1, Tahereh Ziaian2, Elissa Pearson2, Megan Cooper3, Jane Warland3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization, and the 2011 and 2016 Lancet Stillbirth series as well as medical and scientific literature, have all called for stillbirth stigma to be reduced. However, few studies have explored or attempted to conceptualise the meaning of stigma in the context of stillbirth. AIM: To explore the current knowledge surrounding stillbirth stigma, specifically the extent, type and experiences of bereaved parents.
METHODS: A five-stage scoping review framework was utilised. A search of relevant databases (MedLine, EMBASE, PsychInfo, PsychArticles, and Ovid Emcare) was undertaken with several key words related to 'stillbirth' and 'stigma.' The reference lists of included studies were also searched.
FINDINGS: A total of 23 resources met the inclusion criteria for this review. A thematic analysis regarding how stigma was conceptualised and/or experienced within results and/or discussion was employed on these studies. Five over-arching themes, with several sub-themes, were discovered: Type of stigma, identity, silence, bereaved mothers' experiences of stigma in low-income countries and transformation. DISCUSSION: Stillbirth stigma remains an under-researched topic. Few articles conceptualised the experiences of the bereaved parent within a stigma framework. However, examples of bereaved parents enduring stigma were found within the literature. Common stigmatising experiences included, bereaved parents' identities being challenged; and feelings of shame, guilt, and blame after their stillbirth. Stigmatising experiences could be different based on the bereaved parent's cultural background.
CONCLUSION: Further research which attempts to conceptualise stillbirth stigma and explores those experiences from a bereaved parent perspective is needed to help inform stigma reduction strategies.
Copyright © 2019 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bereavement; Pregnancy loss; Scoping review; Social psychology; Stigma; Stillbirth

Year:  2019        PMID: 31296472     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  4 in total

1.  Living with Loss: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating an internet-based perinatal bereavement program for parents following stillbirth and neonatal death.

Authors:  Siobhan A Loughnan; Frances M Boyle; David Ellwood; Sara Crocker; Ann Lancaster; Chrissie Astell; Julie Dean; Dell Horey; Emily Callander; Claire Jackson; Antonia Shand; Vicki Flenady
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.728

2.  Impact of Perinatal Death on the Social and Family Context of the Parents.

Authors:  Cayetano Fernández-Sola; Marcos Camacho-Ávila; José Manuel Hernández-Padilla; Isabel María Fernández-Medina; Francisca Rosa Jiménez-López; Encarnación Hernández-Sánchez; María Belén Conesa-Ferrer; José Granero-Molina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Minority stress theory applied to conception, pregnancy, and pregnancy loss: A qualitative study examining LGBTQ+ people's experiences.

Authors:  Ashley Lacombe-Duncan; Nazanin Andalibi; Lee Roosevelt; Emma Weinstein-Levey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  The impact of cultural beliefs and practices on parents' experiences of bereavement following stillbirth: a qualitative study in Uganda and Kenya.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ayebare; Tina Lavender; Jonan Mweteise; Allen Nabisere; Anne Nendela; Raheli Mukhwana; Rebecca Wood; Sabina Wakasiaka; Grace Omoni; Birungi Susan Kagoda; Tracey A Mills
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.