Literature DB >> 31296364

Bacteria's different ways to recycle their own cell wall.

Christoph Mayer1, Robert Maria Kluj2, Maraike Mühleck2, Axel Walter2, Sandra Unsleber2, Isabel Hottmann2, Marina Borisova2.   

Abstract

The ability to recover components of their own cell wall is a common feature of bacteria. This was initially recognized in the Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli, which recycles about half of the peptidoglycan of its cell wall during one cell doubling. Moreover, E. coli was shown to grow on peptidoglycan components provided as nutrients. A distinguished recycling enzyme of E. coli required for both, recovery of the cell wall sugar N-acetylmuramic acid (MurNAc) of the own cell wall and for growth on external MurNAc, is the MurNAc 6-phosphate (MurNAc 6P) lactyl ether hydrolase MurQ. We revealed however, that most Gram-negative bacteria lack a murQ ortholog and instead harbor a pathway, absent in E. coli, that channels MurNAc directly to peptidoglycan biosynthesis. This "anabolic recycling pathway" bypasses the initial steps of peptidoglycan de novo synthesis, including the target of the antibiotic fosfomycin, thus providing intrinsic resistance to the antibiotic. The Gram-negative oral pathogen Tannerella forsythia is auxotrophic for MurNAc and apparently depends on the anabolic recycling pathway to synthesize its own cell wall by scavenging cell wall debris of other bacteria. In contrast, Gram-positive bacteria lack the anabolic recycling genes, but mostly contain one or two murQ orthologs. Quantification of MurNAc 6P accumulation in murQ mutant cells by mass spectrometry allowed us to demonstrate for the first time that Gram-positive bacteria do recycle their own peptidoglycan. This had been questioned earlier, since peptidoglycan turnover products accumulate in the spent media of Gram-positives. We showed, that these fragments are recovered during nutrient limitation, which prolongs starvation survival of Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus. Peptidoglycan recycling in these bacteria however differs, as the cell wall is either cleaved exhaustively and monosaccharide building blocks are taken up (B. subtilis) or disaccharides are released and recycled involving a novel phosphomuramidase (MupG; S.aureus). In B. subtilis also the teichoic acids, covalently bound to the peptidoglycan (wall teichoic acids; WTAs), are recycled. During phosphate limitation, the sn-glycerol-3-phosphate phosphodiesterase GlpQ specifically degrades WTAs of B. subtilis. In S. aureus, in contrast, GlpQ is used to scavenge external teichoic acid sources. Thus, although bacteria generally recover their own cell wall, they apparently apply distinct strategies for breakdown and reutilization of cell wall fragments. This review summarizes our work on this topic funded between 2011 and 2019 by the DFG within the collaborative research center SFB766.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anabolic recycling pathway; Autolysis; Bacillus subtilis; Cell wall recycling; Escherichia coli; MurQ etherase; N-Acetylmuramic acid; Peptidoglycan turnover; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Staphylococcus aureus; Tannerella forsythia

Year:  2019        PMID: 31296364     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2019.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 1438-4221            Impact factor:   3.473


  15 in total

Review 1.  Constructing and deconstructing the bacterial cell wall.

Authors:  Jed F Fisher; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Solid-State NMR Investigations of Extracellular Matrixes and Cell Walls of Algae, Bacteria, Fungi, and Plants.

Authors:  Nader Ghassemi; Alexandre Poulhazan; Fabien Deligey; Frederic Mentink-Vigier; Isabelle Marcotte; Tuo Wang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 3.  Differences in Fosfomycin Resistance Mechanisms between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales.

Authors:  Dina Zheng; Phillip J Bergen; Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Elizabeth B Hirsch
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.938

Review 4.  Revisiting peptidoglycan sensing: interactions with host immunity and beyond.

Authors:  Geneva Maddison Crump; Junhui Zhou; Siavash Mashayekh; Catherine L Grimes
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 5.  Resource sharing between central metabolism and cell envelope synthesis.

Authors:  Ankita J Sachla; John D Helmann
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 7.934

6.  Protected N-Acetyl Muramic Acid Probes Improve Bacterial Peptidoglycan Incorporation via Metabolic Labeling.

Authors:  Ashley R Brown; Kimberly A Wodzanowski; Cintia C Santiago; Stephen N Hyland; Julianna L Follmar; PapaNii Asare-Okai; Catherine Leimkuhler Grimes
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  Not Just Transporters: Alternative Functions of ABC Transporters in Bacillus subtilis and Listeria monocytogenes.

Authors:  Jeanine Rismondo; Lisa Maria Schulz
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-01-13

8.  Zinc alloy-based bone internal fixation screw with antibacterial and anti-osteolytic properties.

Authors:  Xinhua Qu; Hongtao Yang; Bo Jia; Minqi Wang; Bing Yue; Yufeng Zheng; Kerong Dai
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-05-18

9.  Phosphoglycerol-type wall and lipoteichoic acids are enantiomeric polymers differentiated by the stereospecific glycerophosphodiesterase GlpQ.

Authors:  Axel Walter; Sandra Unsleber; Jeanine Rismondo; Ana Maria Jorge; Andreas Peschel; Angelika Gründling; Christoph Mayer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Utilization of different MurNAc sources by the oral pathogen Tannerella forsythia and role of the inner membrane transporter AmpG.

Authors:  Valentina M T Mayer; Markus B Tomek; Rudolf Figl; Marina Borisova; Isabel Hottmann; Markus Blaukopf; Friedrich Altmann; Christoph Mayer; Christina Schäffer
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.465

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.