| Literature DB >> 31295343 |
Felix Wesener1, Britta Tietjen1,2.
Abstract
Organisms are prone to different stressors and have evolved various defense mechanisms. One such defense mechanism is priming, where a mild preceding stress prepares the organism toward an improved stress response. This improved response can strongly vary, and primed organisms have been found to respond with one of three response strategies: a shorter delay to stress, a faster buildup of their response or a more intense response. However, a universal comparative assessment, which response is superior under a given environmental setting, is missing. We investigate the benefits of the three improved responses for microorganisms with an ordinary differential equation model, simulating the impact of an external stress on a microbial population that is either naïve or primed. We systematically assess the resulting population performance for different costs associated with priming and stress conditions. Our results show that independent of stress type and priming costs, the stronger primed response is most beneficial for longer stress phases, while the faster and earlier responses increase population performance and survival probability under short stresses. Competition increases priming benefits and promotes the early stress response. This dependence on the ecological context highlights the importance of including primed response strategies into microbial stress ecology. © FEMS 2019.Entities:
Keywords: adaptive defense; community ecology; cost–benefit analysis; population dynamics; primed response patterns; stress ecology
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31295343 PMCID: PMC6657816 DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiz114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol ISSN: 0168-6496 Impact factor: 4.194