Literature DB >> 31295019

Comparison between fractal analysis and radiopacity evaluation as a tool for studying repair of an osseous defect in an animal model using biomaterials.

Nathália R Gomes1, Juliano D S Albergaria2, Jonathas A de S Henriques1, Tânia M P Amaral3, Evandro N Abdo3, Gerluza A B Silva2, Cláudia Borges Brasileiro3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate bone repair of an osseous defect in a rat animal model through fractal analysis and radiopacity analysis in radiographic images.
METHODS: 120 rats were subjected to extraction of their first molar and divided into four groups (n = 6/group) according to the material used for bone grafting: mineralized bovine bone, demineralized bovine bone (DBB), blood clot (BC - control) or Bio-Oss® (BO). The animals were sacrificed after 1, 7, 14, 21 and 49 days and subjected to radiographic evaluation. For fractal analysis (FA), a square regionof interest of 30 × 30 pixels was used, and radiopacity was measured as the mean gray scale (MGS) value for three points of 5 × 5 pixels in the apical, medial and coronal regions of the defect. Histomorphometric evaluation was realized as the gold standard for bone neo-formation and maturation of the new osseous matrix.
RESULTS: Histomorphometric evaluation suggested that DBB showed faster mineralized deposition and resulted in more mature bone at the final time point of evaluation. Mineralized bovine bone and Bio-Oss presented similar results. The mineralized groups did not show significant differences in bone maturation. The radiopacity analysis revealed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the DBB and blood clot groups at the final time point. FA did not show any significant differences at the final time point.
CONCLUSIONS: Mean gray scale seemed to be more effective for the quantification of bone repair than FA in the demineralized group in this animal model. Results for the mineralized groups did not reveal a significant difference, leading to the conclusion that both methods are effective.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocompatible biomaterials; Fractals; Radiography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31295019      PMCID: PMC6775790          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20180466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  26 in total

1.  Fourier and fractal analysis of maxillary alveolar ridge repair using platelet rich plasma (PRP) and inorganic bovine bone.

Authors:  A Wojtowicz; S Chaberek; L Kryst; E Urbanowska; K Ciechowicz; K Ostrowski
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 2.  Texture analysis of medical images.

Authors:  G Castellano; L Bonilha; L M Li; F Cendes
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  A randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate a new xenograft for alveolar socket preservation.

Authors:  Monica Calasans-Maia; Rodrigo Resende; Gustavo Fernandes; Jose Calasans-Maia; Adriana Terezinha Alves; José Mauro Granjeiro
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Correlation of radiographic fractal analysis with implant insertion torque in a rabbit trabecular bone model.

Authors:  Mario Veltri; Marco Ferrari; Piero Balleri
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  The computed tomography-based fractal analysis of trabecular bone structure may help in detecting decreased quality of bone before urgent spinal procedures.

Authors:  Marcin Czyz; Arion Kapinas; James Holton; Renata Pyzik; Bronek M Boszczyk; Nasir A Quraishi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Correlation of fractal dimension with histomorphometry in maxillary sinus lifting using autogenous bone graft.

Authors:  Rafael Scaf de Molon; Wagner Nunes de Paula; Rubens Spin-Neto; Mario Henrique Arruda Verzola; Guilherme Monteiro Tosoni; Raphael Carlos Comelli Lia; Gulnara Scaf; Elcio Marcantonio
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

7.  Fractal dimension analysis a supplementary mathematical method for bone defect regeneration measurement.

Authors:  Kamil Jurczyszyn; Paweł Kubasiewicz-Ross; Izabela Nawrot-Hadzik; Tomasz Gedrange; Marzena Dominiak; Jakub Hadzik
Journal:  Ann Anat       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Bone formation with two types of grafting materials: a histologic and histomorphometric study.

Authors:  Amir Reza Rokn; Mohammad Amin Khodadoostan; Amir Ali Reza Rasouli Ghahroudi; Puria Motahhary; Mohammad Javad Kharrazi Fard; Hugo De Bruyn; Rose Afzalifar; Ehsan Soolar; Ahmad Soolari
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2011-07-07

9.  A clinical study of alveolar bone quality using the fractal dimension and the implant stability quotient.

Authors:  Dae-Hyun Lee; Young Ku; In-Chul Rhyu; Jeong-Ug Hong; Cheol-Woo Lee; Min-Suk Heo; Kyung-Hoe Huh
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 2.614

10.  Prediction of age-related osteoporosis using fractal analysis on panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Kwang-Joon Koh; Ha-Na Park; Kyoung-A Kim
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2012-12-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.