| Literature DB >> 31294096 |
Alejandra Ordoñez-Ordoñez1,2, Dolly M Revelo-Romo2, Ana M Garcia-Mora1, Arsenio Hidalgo-Troya3, Luis-Alejandro Galeano1.
Abstract
The optimization of the Catalytic Wet Peroxide Oxidation (CWPO) assisted by an Al/Fe-pillared clay (Al/Fe-PILC) was assessed in the inactivation of the MS2 coliphage in the presence of a synthetic surrogate of natural organic matter (NOM). The simultaneous effect of two experimental factors (i) H2O2 dose - (H2O2)d (3.00-25.50 % of the H2O2 theoretically required for full mineralization) and (ii) catalyst concentration (0.33-2.60 g/L), and four non-controllable variables (covariates) (a) circumneutral pH (6.00-9.00), (b) temperature (5.00-25.0 °C), (c) synthetic NOM concentration (2.0-20.0 mg C/L) and (d) MS2 titer (104, 105 and 106 PFU/mL) was investigated by Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Every response was modeled and maximized: (1) MS2 inactivation, (2) fraction of reacted H2O2, (3) decolourization and (4) NOM mineralization. Multi-response optimization via desirability function based on responses (1) to (3) achieved excellent fitting (0.94 out of 1.0) and following set of optimal experimental conditions: 0.33 g Al/Fe-PILC/L, 3.36 % (H2O2)d (Feactive/H2O2) = 0.46, giving rise to 92.9 % of MS2 inactivation and 100 % of reacted H2O2 at pH 7.07, 25.0 +/- 0.1 °C, 16.06 mg C/L as starting NOM concentration, and MS2 titer of 106 PFU/mL after just 70 min of reaction.Entities:
Keywords: Al/Fe-pillared clay; Analytical chemistry; Applied chemistry; Applied microbiology; CWPO; Drinking water quality; Environmental chemistry processes; Environmental science; Environmental technology; MS2 coliphage; Materials chemistry; Microbiology; Nanotechnology; Natural hazards; Response surface methodology; Statistical optimization; Water disinfection; Water pollution treatment
Year: 2019 PMID: 31294096 PMCID: PMC6595173 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01892
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Experimental conditions of the CWPO treatments and measured responses after 70 min of reaction.
| Run | Factors | Covariates | Responses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cat. (g/L) | (H2O2)d (%) | pH | T (°C) | DOC | Viral titer | MS2 Inactivation (%) | H2O2 reacted (%) | Decolouriza-tion (%) | NOM Minera-lization (%) | |
| 1 | 0.33 | 14.2 | 6.26 | 13.3 | 3.47 | 2.23*103 | 94.3 | 86.9 | 8.0 | 2.42 |
| 2 | 1.46 | 14.2 | 7.30 | 16.3 | 7.77 | 3.35*103 | 82.5 | 30.8 | 15.7 | 21.49 |
| 3 | 1.46 | 14.2 | 7.32 | 15.2 | 14.3 | 3.12*105 | 77.7 | 50.3 | 25.8 | 13.91 |
| 4 | 0.66 | 22.2 | 7.47 | 18.5 | 6.28 | 1.63*105 | 97.4 | 99.1 | 16.0 | 24.24 |
| 5 | 2.27 | 6.30 | 6.85 | 16.7 | 3.27 | 1.70*103 | 81.5 | 100 | 47.5 | 15.18 |
| 6 | 0.66 | 6.30 | 5.85 | 17.3 | 5.28 | 1.74*105 | 95.8 | 100 | 24.0 | 17.37 |
| 7 | 2.27 | 22.2 | 5.45 | 16.2 | 10.5 | 4.75*104 | 88.8 | 60.3 | 23.5 | 9.37 |
| 8 | 1.46 | 3.00 | 6.29 | 11.8 | 10.3 | 2.75*104 | 71.1 | 100 | 36.1 | 14.25 |
| 9 | 1.46 | 25.5 | 7.09 | 15.5 | 14.0 | 6.20*105 | 96.5 | 68.0 | 27.9 | 14.38 |
| 10 | 2.60 | 14.2 | 7.01 | 17.4 | 19.8 | 8.90*105 | 91.0 | 70.6 | 32.8 | 31.75 |
| 11 | 1.46 | 14.2 | 7.20 | 14.5 | 12.4 | 9.35*104 | 69.6 | 79.1 | 20.7 | 17.51 |
| Bcat | 2.27 | 0.00 | 6.98 | 25.0 | 14.8 | 9.40*105 | 82.6 | 0.00 | 29.5 | 0.68 |
| BH2O2 | 0.00 | 3.36 | 6.90 | 19.4 | 16.2 | 1.52*105 | 25.3 | 39.5 | 5.90 | 5.19 |
| BNOM | 0.33 | 3.36 | 7.02 | 25.0 | 0.00 | 2.57*105 | 71.6 | 100 | 0.00 | NA |
| BDark | 0.33 | 3.36 | 6.9 | 19.4 | 16.5 | 1.52*105 | 74.2 | 39.5 | 10.4 | 13.36 |
| Opt. | 0.33 | 3.36 | 7.07 | 25.0 | 16.1 | 3.00*106 | 88.4 | 100 | 20.2 | 14.20 |
pH, DOC, and MS2 titer starting values were experimentally measured. NA: Not applicable.
Sampling throughout every experiment of MS2 CWPO catalytic inactivation.
| Sample | Assay time (min) | Reaction time (min) | Reaction conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| ti | 0 | -- | NOM standard surrogate spiked with MS2. |
| t0 | 30 | 0 | NOM standard surrogate spiked with MS2 and catalyst Al/Fe PILC clay. |
| t1 | 40 | 10 | 25 % of H2O2 added |
| t2 | 50 | 20 | 50 % of H2O2 added |
| t3 | 60 | 30 | 75 % of H2O2 added |
| t4 | 70 | 40 | 100 % of H2O2 added |
| tf | 100 | 70 | NOM standard surrogate spiked with MS2 and Al/Fe-PILC clay-catalyst. No H2O2 addition through final, recorded 30 min. |
Levels of experimental factors in the rotatable central composite (22) statistical design for RSM single-response optimization.
| Experimental factors | Level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (H2O2)d (%) | 3.00 | 6.30 | 14.25 | 22.21 | 25.50 |
| Catalyst concentration (g/L) | 0.33 | 0.66 | 1.46 | 2.27 | 2.60 |
Fig. 1CWPO inactivation of the MS2 coliphage under different experimental conditions. Multi-response optimum: 0.33 g cat/L (H2O2)d = 3.36 %. Bcat: 2.27 g cat/L. BH2O2 (H2O2)d = 3.36 %. BNOM: 0.33 g cat./L (H2O2)d = 3.36 % without NOM. Dark: 0.33 g cat/L (H2O2)d = 3.36 % without natural solar light irradiation.
Fig. 2Color removal throughout the CWPO inactivation of the MS2 coliphage. Multi-response optimum: 0.33 g cat/L (H2O2)d = 3.36 %. Bcat: 2.27 g cat/L. BH2O2 (H2O2)d = 3.36 %. Dark: 0.33 g cat./L (H2O2)d = 3.36 % without presence of natural solar light irradiation.
Fig. 3Fraction of reacted H2O2 throughout the CWPO inactivation of the MS2 coliphage. Multi-response optimum: 0.33 g cat/L (H2O2)d = 3.36 %. BH2O2 (H2O2)d = 3.36 %. BNOM: 0.33 g cat./L (H2O2)d = 3.36 % without the presence of NOM. Dark: 0.33 g cat/L (H2O2)d = 3.36 % without the presence of natural solar light irradiation.
P-values∗ of covariates from multiple regressions for every analyzed response.
| Parameter | MS2 Inactivation | Reacted H2O2 | Decolourization | NOM mineralization |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.34 |
| pH | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.51 |
| Temperature | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.46 | 0.21 |
| Initial DOC | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.46 |
| Initial viral titer | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.82 |
| R | 0.489 | 0.527 | 0.277 | 0.477 |
Statistical analyses performed at 95 % of confidence.
Experimental conditions of the CWPO treatments and measured responses per unit mass of catalyst.
| Run | Factors | Responses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cat (g/L) | (H2O2)d (%)b | MS2 Inactivation (%/g cat.) | H2O2 reacted (%/g cat.) | Decolourization (%/g cat.) | NOM Mineralization (%/g cat.) | |
| 1 | 0.33 | 14.2 | 296.5 | 274 | 25.1 | 7.60 |
| 2 | 1.46 | 14.2 | 57.7 | 21.5 | 10.9 | 15.0 |
| 3 | 1.46 | 14.2 | 54.3 | 35.1 | 18.0 | 9.71 |
| 4 | 0.66 | 22.2 | 151.3 | 154 | 24.8 | 37.6 |
| 5 | 2.27 | 6.30 | 36.7 | 45.1 | 21.4 | 6.84 |
| 6 | 0.66 | 6.30 | 148.8 | 155 | 37.2 | 27.0 |
| 7 | 2.27 | 22.2 | 40.0 | 27.2 | 10.6 | 4.22 |
| 8 | 1.46 | 3.00 | 49.7 | 69.8 | 25.2 | 9.95 |
| 9 | 1.46 | 25.5 | 67.4 | 47.5 | 19.5 | 10.0 |
| 10 | 2.6 | 14.2 | 35.8 | 27.7 | 12.9 | 12.5 |
| 11 | 1.46 | 14.2 | 48.6 | 55.3 | 14.4 | 12.2 |
Regression coefficients and variance analysis for every studied response.
| Term | MS2 Inactivation | Reacted H2O2 | Decolourization | NOM mineralization | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coeff. | p-value | Coeff. | p-value | Coeff. | p-value | Coeff. | p-value | |
| Constant | 354.22 | - | 389.49 | - | 57.10 | - | 11.84 | - |
| A:Catalyst | -331.12 | -338.47 | -20.93 | 0.14 | 0.13 | |||
| B: (H2O2)d | 0.49 | 0.64 | -4.56 | 0.40 | -2.59 | 0.89 | 0.77 | |
| AA | 81.59 | 84.53 | 4.64 | 0.12 | - | - | ||
| AB | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.52 | 0.51 |
| BB | - | - | 0.13 | 0.36 | 0.07 | - | - | |
| R2 adjusted | 0.946 | - | 0.962 | - | 0.857 | - | 0.334 | - |
Statistical analyses performed at 95 % of confidence.
RSM single-response and desirability-based multi-response optimized values for Al/Fe-PILC catalyzed CWPO inactivation of the MS2 coliphage.
| Response | Catalyst concentration (g/L) | (H2O2)d (%) | Modeled single-response optimum (%) | Modeled multi-response optimum (%) | Experimental multi-response optimum (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS2 Inactivation | 0.33 | 25.5 | 87.8 | 84.3 | 88.4 |
| Fraction of reacted H2O2 | 0.33 | 3.00 | 90.6 | 90.1 | 100 |
| Decolourization | 0.33 | 3.00 | 14.4 | 14.1 | 22.2 |
| NOM mineralization | 0.33 | 25.5 | 9.95 | 9.95 | 14.2 |
| Desirability | 0.33 | 25.5 | - | 0.85 | - |
| Desirability | 0.33 | 3.36 | - | 0.94 | - |
Multi-response optimization including NOM mineralization.
Excluding NOM mineralization.
Fig. 4Response surfaces and contour graphs of the CWPO experimental factors for each response normalized to the amount of catalyst in the inactivation of the MS2 coliphage: (a) MS2 Inactivation; (b) Decolourization; (c) Reacted H2O2; (d) NOM mineralization.
Fig. 5Response surface and contour graph of multiresponse optimized CWPO treatment in terms of MS2 inactivation, decolourization and reacted H2O2.
Fig. 6Experimental evaluation of the multi-response optimal conditions of the CWPO reaction in terms of MS2 inactivation, fraction of reacted H2O2 and decolourization: 0.33 g cat/L; 3.36 % (H2O2)d, 25.0 °C, pH0 = 7.07, DOC0 = 16.06 mg C/L and 106 PFU/mL.