| Literature DB >> 31293853 |
Binjing Hu1, Qiang Sun2,3, Chengyi Zuo1, Yunxin Pei1, Siwei Yang1, Hui Zheng1, Fangming Liu1.
Abstract
A mild and simple method was developed to synthesize a highly efficient photocatalyst comprised of Ce-doped ZnO rods and optimal synthesis conditions were determined by testing samples with different Ce/ZnO molar ratios calcined at 500 °C for 3 hours via a one-step pyrolysis method. The photocatalytic activity was assessed by the degradation of a common dye pollutant found in wastewater, rhodamine B (RhB), using a sunlight simulator. The results showed that ZnO doped with 3% Ce exhibits the highest RhB degradation rate. To understand the crystal structure, elemental state, surface morphology and chemical composition, the photocatalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy (ICP), respectively. The newly developed, robust, field-only surface integral method was employed to explore the relationship between the remarkable catalytic effect and the catalyst shape and porous microstructure. The computational results showed that the dipole-like field covers the entire surface of the rod-like Ce-doped ZnO photocatalyst and is present over the entire range of wavelengths considered. The optimum degradation conditions were determined by orthogonal tests and range analysis, including the concentration of RhB and catalyst, pH value and temperature. The results indicate that the pH value is the main influential factor in the photocatalytic degradation process and the optimal experimental conditions to achieve the maximum degradation rate of 97.66% in 2 hours are as follows: concentration (RhB) = 10 mg/L, concentration (catalyst) = 0.7 g/L, pH 9.0 and T = 50 °C. These optimum conditions supply a helpful reference for large-scale wastewater degradation containing the common water contaminant RhB.Entities:
Keywords: Ce-doped ZnO; photocatalyst; rhodamine B; solar degradation; surface shape
Year: 2019 PMID: 31293853 PMCID: PMC6604740 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.10.115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
Figure 1Photocatalytic activity of samples with different Ce doping percentages.
Design and results of the orthogonal experiments.
| No. | Degradation rate/% | ||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 77.14 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 26.67 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 92.37 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 32.02 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 82.34 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 97.11 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 94.42 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 90.42 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 23.18 |
Range analysis of orthogonal experimental results.
| K1 | 65.39 | 67.86 | 88.22 | 60.89 |
| K2 | 70.49 | 66.48 | 27.29 | 72.73 |
| K3 | 69.34 | 70.89 | 89.71 | 71.6 |
| R | 5.09 | 4.41 | 62.42 | 11.84 |
Figure 2The cycle usage of the CZO-4 photocatalyst under optimized conditions in 2 h.
Figure 3XRD patterns of ZnO and CZO-4 (3% Ce doping).
Figure 4Ce 3d XPS of the catalyst CZO-4.
Figure 5SEM micrographs of (a) ZnO and (b) CZO-4 (3% Ce doping).
ICP-MS data of Zn and Ce in the CZO-4 sample. Standard deviation (STD), relative standard deviation (RSD).
| Mean corrected | Calibrated | Sample | ||||
| Analyte | Intensity | Concentration | STD | Concentration | STD | RSD |
| Zn 206.200 | 288353.3 | 6.172 mg/L | 0.0288 | 6.172 mg/L | 0.0288 | 0.47% |
| Ce 413.764 | 7642.2 | 0.065 mg/L | 0.0014 | 0.065 mg/L | 0.0014 | 2.09% |
Figure 6The total electric field on the surface of a ZnO sphere with diameter of 1 µm due to an incident electric field Einc = (1,0,0) exp(ikz) where λ = 400 to 760 nm. The magnitude of the field, Ex, is given by the color scale.
Figure 7The total field on the surface of a ZnO rod with length of 3 µm and width of 1 µm due to an incident electric field Einc = (1,0,0) exp(ikz) with λ = 400 to 760 nm. The magnitude of the field, E, is given by the color scale.
Table of experimental factors for the orthogonal table of L9 (34). Nine experiments with different concentrations of RhB (A, mg/L), catalyst amount (B, mg/mL), pH value (C), and temperature (D, °C) were performed.
| Level | ||||
| 1 | 5 | 0.3 | 5.65a | 40 |
| 2 | 10 | 0.5 | 4 | 50 |
| 3 | 15 | 0.7 | 9 | 60 |
aOriginal pH.