Literature DB >> 3129373

The relative efficacies of tobramycin and ciprofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in normal and granulocytopenic mice.

J J Hoogeterp1, H Mattie, P Terporten.   

Abstract

Ciprofloxacin was studied in vitro and in an experimental thigh infection model in mice to evaluate its efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in comparison with that of tobramycin. The in vivo experiments were carried out in normal mice as well as mice rendered granulocytopenic by irradiation. The MIC of ciprofloxacin for two Pseudomonas strains was 0.125 mg/l and 0.25 mg/l and that of tobramycin 0.25 mg/l and 4.0 mg/l, respectively. In vitro short-term growth experiments revealed that as far as initial killing rate is concerned, ciprofloxacin was 2.20 times as potent as tobramycin against the first strain and 45.4 times as potent against the second strain. The in vivo experiments were performed by injecting the micro-organism into the thigh muscle and counting colony forming units (CFUs) after several hours of exposure to the antibiotics. The results for irradiated mice indicate that ciprofloxacin was 2.0 times as potent as tobramycin against the first strain and 37.8 times as potent against the second strain, when related to dosage. For normal mice these values were 2.0 and 16.0, respectively, which is more than would be expected from the in vitro experiments because the mean plasma concentrations of tobramycin were about four times higher than those of ciprofloxacin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3129373     DOI: 10.1007/bf01646935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  8 in total

1.  The in-vitro activity of ciprofloxacin compared with that of norfloxacin and nalidixic acid.

Authors:  A King; K Shannon; I Phillips
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Quantitative determination of the effect of granulocytes on the course of experimental infections during antibiotic treatment.

Authors:  G B van der Voet; H Mattie; R van Furth
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  The relative potency of amoxycillin and ampicillin in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  H Mattie; G B van der Voet
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  1981

4.  In-vitro studies with ciprofloxacin, a new 4-quinolone compound.

Authors:  D S Reeves; M J Bywater; H A Holt; L O White
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  In vitro activity of the newer quinolones compared with the classic ones and tobramycin.

Authors:  E Boquet Jiménez; F Dalet Escribá; L Caballé
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  In vitro activity of Bay 09867, a new quinoline derivative, compared with those of other antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  R Wise; J M Andrews; L J Edwards
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Activities of pefloxacin and ciprofloxacin in experimentally induced Pseudomonas pneumonia in neutropenic guinea pigs.

Authors:  F M Gordin; C J Hackbarth; K G Scott; M A Sande
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparative evaluation of ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, and ofloxacin in experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia.

Authors:  B Kemmerich; G J Small; J E Pennington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.191

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.