| Literature DB >> 31293514 |
Thozhukat Sathyapalan1, James P Hobkirk2, Zeeshan Javed1, Sean Carroll2, Anne-Marie Coady3, Philip Pemberton4, Alexander Smith4, Katherine Cianflone5, Stephen L Atkin6.
Abstract
Background: Atorvastatin has been shown to improve cardiovascular risk (CVR) indices in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Low-grade chronic inflammation of adipose tissue may link PCOS and adverse CVR. In pro-inflammatory states such as PCOS, spontaneous activation of the alternative pathway of complement results in increased generation of acylation stimulating protein (ASP) from adipocytes irrespective of body mass index.Entities:
Keywords: PCOS; acylation-stimulating-protein; adipose tissue; atorvastatin; interleukin-6; monocyte-chemoattractant-protein-1
Year: 2019 PMID: 31293514 PMCID: PMC6604602 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00394
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Figure 1Flow chart of participants through the study.
Comparison of inflammatory and adipose tissue dysfunction markers at baseline, 12 weeks of atorvastatin or placebo followed by 12 weeks of metformin.
| ASP (ng/ml) | 156.7 ± 16.2 | 124.4 ± 14.8 | 119.5 ± 23.8 | <0.01 | −20.0 ± 1.5 | 0.41 | <0.01 | 153.7 ± 20.1 | 135.6 ± 23.4 | 158.1 ± 32.8 | 0.37 | −11.7 ± 3.2 | 0.16 | 0.52 |
| IL-6 (pg/ml) | 1.48 ± 0.29 | 0.73 ± 0.34 | 0.74 ± 0.21 | 0.01 | −50.7 ± 3.9 | 0.91 | 0.02 | 1.42 ± 0.28 | 1.21 ± 0.82 | 1.32 ± 0.25 | 0.54 | −14.8 ± 5.2 | 0.86 | 0.73 |
| MCP-1 (pg/ml) | 30.4 ± 4.2 | 23.0 ± 4.5 | 23.9 ± 6.2 | 0.02 | 24.3 ± 2.2 | 0.63 | 0.04 | 29.7 ± 4.9 | 27.1 ± 9.2 | 30.1 ± 4.6 | 0.30 | −8.2 ± 1.9 | 0.49 | 0.97 |
Atorvastatin pre-treatment group, Atorvastatin for 12 weeks followed by Metformin for 12 weeks; Placebo pre-treatment group, Placebo for 12 weeks followed by Metformin for 12 weeks; V1, Baseline; V2, 12 weeks from baseline on either atorvastatin or placebo; V3, 24 weeks from baseline (12 weeks from visit 2 on Metformin 1.5 g daily). Comparison between V1, V2, V3 in each group done using paired t-test.
P, P-value for percentage difference between both group using unpaired t-test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. All serum results are obtained from fasting variables.
Correlation coefficients between changes in ASP, IL-6, and MCP-1 and changes in waist circumference, cholesterol, testosterone, hs-CRP, and HOMA after atorvastatin treatment.
| Δ Weight | 0.13 | 0.59 | |
| Δ Waist circumference | 0.12 | 0.78 | |
| Δ Total cholesterol | 0.24 | 0.66 | |
| Δ Triglycerides | 0.32 | 0.04 | |
| Δ Testosterone | 0.66 | <0.01 | |
| Δ hs-CRP | 0.52 | 0.01 | |
| Δ HOMA-IR | 0.59 | <0.01 | |
| Δ Weight | 0.12 | 0.96 | |
| Δ Waist circumference | 0.16 | 0.90 | |
| Δ Total cholesterol | 0.22 | 0.52 | |
| Δ Triglycerides | 0.12 | 0.33 | |
| Δ Testosterone | 0.49 | 0.01 | |
| Δ hs-CRP | 0.57 | <0.01 | |
| Δ HOMA-IR | 0.19 | 0.27 | |
| Δ Weight | 0.20 | 0.34 | |
| Δ Waist circumference | 0.10 | 0.95 | |
| Δ Total cholesterol | 0.11 | 0.82 | |
| Δ Triglycerides | 0.22 | 0.79 | |
| Δ Testosterone | 0.41 | 0.01 | |
| Δ hs-CRP | 0.44 | <0.01 | |
| Δ HOMA-IR | 0.36 | 0.02 | |
Multiple linear stepwise regression model identifying independent predictors of changes in testosterone, hs-CRP, and HOMA-IR.
| 0.46 ( | 0.52 ( | 0.40 ( | |
| Independent variables | Δ ASP ( | Δ ASP ( | Δ ASP ( |
For dependent variables, Δ Testosterone, Δ hs-CRP, and Δ HOMA-IR were used. Independent variable included Δ ASP, Δ IL-6, and Δ MCP-1.